UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to§240.14a-12.

Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange ActRules 14a-6(i)(4) and0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 (2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 (3)

Filing Party:

 

 (4)

Date Filed:


LOGOLOGO


LOGOLOGO

LETTER TOFROM OUR STOCKHOLDERSCEO

 

LOGO

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

 

On behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”), I would like to inviteWe welcome you to the 2019join us at our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)(Annual Meeting) to be held at our West Plano Theatre located at 3800 Dallas Parkway, Plano, TX 75093virtually on May 23, 201920, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. CDT. The accompanying formal noticeNotice of Annual Meeting and proxy statement set forthProxy Statement, following this letter, provides more information regarding the details regarding admissionvirtual-only meeting and the business to be conductedwe will conduct at the Annual Meeting.

It is almost unfathomable that one year ago, we were reporting Cinemark’s fifth consecutive year of record results with the North American industry touting the second-highest grossing box office of all-time. At the beginning of 2020, we reflected an incredibly strong Company with areflected an incredibly strong Company with a history of discipline and consistency, operating in a stable and mature industry. It goes without saying that COVID-19 has

LOGO

caused significant distress in multiple industries, including the movie exhibition industry, and tested the strength and resiliency of our Company over the course of the past year.

The North-American movie exhibition industry achievedCinemark is still a strong company operating with balance, discipline and consistency, while adapting to our current circumstances. This past year has only reinforced that Cinemark has tenacity and perseverance in addition to anall-time high box office of $11.9 billion ability and a willingness to think quickly and move nimbly as we evolve in 2018, an increase of 6.9% over 2017. For the ninth time outthis unpredictable, ever-changing environment.

Cinemark was one of the past ten years, we outperformedfirst theatre chains to reopen and has largely been able to remain open, government restrictions notwithstanding. At the end of the year, approximately 75% of our U.S. circuit was reopened, compared to 45% of the North American industry box office with 7.7% domestic box office growth and a 6.3% increaseindustry. Similarly, in attendance. The strength of the film content coupled with our consistent executionLatin America, we had approximately 65% of our strategic initiatives led totheatres operating by year-end. Our theatre teams have been proficient in executing our fourth consecutive year ofall-time highs, including recordsenhanced cleaning and safety protocols, named The Cinemark Standard. Since we began reopening in all revenue categoriesJune, we have consistently received 96% guest satisfaction scores on Cinemark protecting their health and $3.2 billion in worldwide revenues.

During 2018,safety. Notably, we served more than 280 million guests worldwide and expanded our footprint through new builds and acquisitions for a total of more than 6,000 screens across our global footprint spanning 16 countries. Our domestic subscription program, Movie Club, achieved more than 530,000 members, which was 250% more than our initialone-year goal and represented nearly 1,600 members per theatre. Additionally, we increased our recliner penetration from 45%are continuing to more than 55% ofcover our domestic circuit,incremental variable costs associated with being open and are burning less cash with theatres open than we would if the highest among the major exhibitors.theatres remained closed.

The focusI am proud of the executiveaccomplishments the entire team has always been to drive stockholder value and to increase the return on your investment in the Company. In that spirit, we increased our cash dividend by $0.08 annually in the fourth quarter of 2018, thus growing our cash dividend by 36% cumulatively and distributing more than $640 million to our stockholders,made over the past five years.year. While we were well-positioned heading into the crisis, we have adapted the way we operate to become more efficient and navigate the current environment. We are working diligently to remain successful and further solidify our leadership position as theatrical moviegoing resurges, which will ultimately benefit long-term stockholder value.

The Board,Lastly, our Board’s active oversight has been integral to our success in helping management navigate the management teamchallenges and I would like to thankimpacts associated with the COVID-19 pandemic with their diverse viewpoints, financial acumen and deep industry knowledge and expertise.

Thank you for choosingyour continued support, trust and investment in Cinemark. We look forward to invest in Cinemark and extend a warm invitation to attend theyour participation at our Annual Meeting.

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT TO US. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, I urge you to please cast your vote as soon as possible via the Internet, telephone or mail.

Warm regards,

LOGO

Mark Zoradi

Sincerely,
LOGO
Mark Zoradi
Chief Executive Officer


CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC.

3900 Dallas Parkway Suite 500

Plano, Texas 75093

NOTICE OF 2019 ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

April 8, 20192, 2021

Dear Stockholders:

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of the Company will be held on May 23, 201920, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. CDT, at our West Plano Theatre located at 3800 Dallas Parkway, Plano, TX 75093,virtually, for the following purposes:

 

 1.

To elect three Class IIIII directors to serve for three years on our Board;board of directors;

 2.

To ratify the appointment of Deloitte and Touche, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;2021;

 3.

To hold the annual,non-binding, advisory vote on our executive compensation program; and

 4.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 25, 2021, set as the Record Date, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

For the second consecutive year, our Annual Meeting will be conducted exclusively online via live audio webcast. Conducting the meeting virtually will again ensure stockholder access in light of the expected ongoing uncertainty for large gatherings due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Stockholders will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate in a virtual-only Annual Meeting as they would at an in-person meeting.

To be admitted to the virtual-only Annual Meeting, stockholders as of the Record Date must use the following link: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CNK2021 and enter the 16-digit control number found on the proxy card or the voting instruction form. By logging into the website, stockholders as of the Record Date will be able to vote shares electronically on all items to be considered at the Annual Meeting. If a stockholder as of the Record Date has any question pertaining to the business of the Annual Meeting, it must be submitted in advance of the Annual Meeting by visiting www.proxyvote.com. Questions may be submitted until 10:59 p.m. CDT, on Tuesday, May 18, 2021. Stockholders must have their proxy cards or voting instruction forms in hand when accessing the website and follow the instructions. To allow us to respond at the Annual Meeting to the maximum number of stockholders, each stockholder will be limited to one question.

Those without a 16-digit control number will be admitted to the virtual-only Annual Meeting as guests, but guests will not have the ability to vote or otherwise participate.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

LOGO

Michael Cavalier

Executive Vice President-General Counsel & Secretary

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO US. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented. Therefore, we urge you to promptly vote and submit your proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting. You can vote your shares via the Internet, by telephone, or by signing, dating, and returning the proxy card or voting instruction form. To vote via the Internet or telephone, follow the instructions included in the proxy card or the voting instruction form. You can revoke a proxy at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting by following the instructions in the proxy statement.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF

DIRECTORS,

LOGO

Michael Cavalier

Executive Vice President — General Counsel

and Secretary

The proxy statement and the 2020 Form 10-K are available at

http://materials.proxyvote.com/17243V


PROXY STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

LETTER FROM OUR CEO

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

   1 

GENERAL INFORMATION

   1113 

ITEM ONE - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

11

Composition of the Board

11

Director Qualifications

11

Board Diversity

12

Nominations for Election to the Board

12

Annual Meeting SlateSOLICITATION OF PROXIES

   13 

SHARES OUTSTANDING AND VOTING RIGHTS

13

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

   1913 

Board Leadership StructureBOARD COMPOSITION

   1913 

Board’s Role in Risk OversightITEM ONE — ELECTION OF THREE CLASS II DIRECTORS

   1913 

Director IndependenceANNUAL MEETING SLATE

13

NOMINATIONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD

   20 

Meeting AttendanceBOARD LEADERSHIP

20

BOARD INDEPENDENCE

   21 

Executive Sessions

21

Stockholder Communications with the Board

21

Corporate Governance Policies and ChartersCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

   22 

Code of Business Conduct and EthicsBOARD DIVERSITY AND DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS

   2224 

BOARD OVERSIGHT OF RISK

25

MEETING ATTENDANCE

26

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS

26

INVESTOR OUTREACH

26

STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

27

OUR ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PRACTICES

27

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICIES AND CHARTERS

28

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

28

BOARD COMMITTEES

   2229 

AUDIT COMMITTEE

29

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

31

GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

31

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

   2532 

ITEM TWO - RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE AND TOUCHE, LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 20192021

   2734 

ITEM THREE - ANNUAL ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

   2734 

Executive Summary

27

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

   2935 

Compensation PhilosophyTABLE OF CONTENTS

   2935 

2018 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTSOUR NEOS

   2935 

Company Performance Over the 1-Year Period2020 SAY-ON-PAY RESULT

   3036 

Company Performance Over the 5-Year PeriodEXECUTIVE SUMMARY

   3037 

Our Performance As Compared to Our PeersOVERVIEW OF 2020 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SET IN FEBRUARY 2020

   3038 


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICES

40

OUR COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

40

DESIGN OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

   32

ANALYSIS OF THE DESIGN OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

32

Base Salary

32

Cash Bonus

33

Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation

36

Compensation Mix

38

THE PROCESS OF SETTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

39

Compensation Risk Assessment

40 

Compensation Committee ReportEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMPONENTS

   41 

2021 COMPENSATION CHANGES

50

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROCESS: ROLES

50

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROCESS: PEER GROUP REVIEW

51

COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT

51

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

52

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

53

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 20182020

   4254 

CEO Pay Ratio for 2018PAY RATIO FOR 2020

   4356 

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 20182020

   4457 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 2018 2020

   4559 

STOCK OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 20182020

   4660 

DISCUSSION OF THE TERMS OF THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS WITH OUR NEOS

   4761 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

   5467 

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS


67

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

   5568 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

56

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

57

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

   5870 

DEADLINE FOR STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20202022 ANNUAL MEETING

   6274 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

   6375 

STOCKHOLDERS SHARING A COMMON ADDRESS

75

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

75

OTHER MATTERS

   6375 

AVAILABILITY OF REPORT ON FORM 10-K

   6375 

QUESTIONS

   6475 


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement and in our annual report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “20182020 (2020 Form10-K”)10-K) as filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 28, 201926, 2021 for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”, “Cinemark”, “we”(Company, Cinemark, we or “us”)us). You should carefully read the entire proxy statement and the Company’s 20182020 Form10-K before voting.

ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

MEETING DATE

TIME

RECORD DATE

THURSDAY, MAY 20, 2021

9:00 A.M. CDTMARCH 25, 2021

HOW TO VOTE

Please act as soon as possible to vote your shares, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting online. If you are a beneficial stockholder, your broker will NOT be able to vote your shares with respect to non-routine matters unless you have given your broker specific instructions to do so. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote via the Internet, by telephone, or, if you have received a printed version of these proxy materials, by mail. For more information regarding voting, see “Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting” beginning on page 70.

LOGO         LOGO         LOGO             

VOTE

ONLINE at www.proxyvote.com

You may also attend the Annual Meeting online to vote at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CNK2021

BY PHONE by calling the applicable number.

For stockholders of record: (800) 690-6903

For beneficial owners: the telephone number on your voting instruction form.

For online and phone voting, you will need the 16-digit control number on your proxy card or voting instruction form.

BY MAIL if you have received a printed version of these proxy materials.

ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING

LOGISTICS

•  Attend the Annual Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CNK2021

•  The Annual Meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. CDT, with log-in beginning at 8:45 a.m., on Thursday, May 20, 2021.

ASKING QUESTIONS

If you have a question pertaining to the business of the Annual Meeting, you must submit it in advance of the Annual Meeting by visiting www.proxyvote.com. Questions may be submitted until 10:59 p.m. CDT, on Tuesday, May 18, 2021. You should have your proxy card or voting instruction form in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions. To allow us to respond at the Annual Meeting to the maximum number of stockholders, each stockholder will be limited to one question.

 

 

IF YOU CANNOT ATTEND, FOLLOWING THE ANNUAL MEETING:

•  Appropriate questions received that are not addressed at the Annual Meeting due to time constraints will be posted, along with our responses, on https://ir.cinemark.com as soon as practical after the conclusion of the Annual Meeting.

LOGO1


VOTING ROADMAP

 

LOGOItem   

LOGO

  

LOGO

LOGO

Date and Time:

Thursday,

May 23, 2019 at

9:00 a.m. CDT

LOGO
   Elect Three Class II Director Nominees
See page 13 The Board recommends a vote FOR each nominee
NameIndependent
Director
Since

Board Committees
 

Location:Darcy Antonellis

Cinemark West Plano TheatreCEO of Vubiquity, Inc.

3800 Dallas ParkwayFormer President of Technical Operations and Chief Technology Officer of Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.

Plano, TX 75093

 

 

 

  2015 

Record Date:•  Audit

March 28, 2019•  Strategic Long-Range Planning

Carlos Sepulveda

Chairman of the board of directors of Triumph Bancorp, Inc.

Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Interstate Battery System international, Inc.

2007

•  Audit

•  Compensation

•  Strategic Long-Range Planning

Lead Director

Mark Zoradi

Chief Executive Officer

Former President of Walt Disney Studios Motion Picture Group

X

2015

•  None

   
Item
LOGO  Ratify Deloitte and Touche, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021
See page 34 The Board recommends a vote FOR this item

Proxy Mail Date:  Independent firm with reasonable fees and significant financial reporting expertise

On or about  Deloitte and Touche has audited our consolidated financial statements annually since 1987

April 8, 2019  Audit Committee annually evaluates the independence of Deloitte and Touche and has determined that its appointment continues to be in the best interests of our stockholders

Item
LOGO  Non-binding, annual advisory vote on our executive compensation program
See page 34 The Board recommends a vote FOR this item

  Annual say-on-pay vote

  At the 2020 Annual Meeting, approximately 96% of votes cast were in favor of our executive compensation program

  The key elements of our executive compensation program remain unchanged

  Our compensation principles and practices promote pay-for-performance and align executive and stockholder interests

  Our 2020 executive compensation was reasonable, performance-centric and balanced, and discretion-based adjustments appropriate in light of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company and employee compensation

HOW TO VOTE

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please cast your vote as soon as possible by following the instructions on your proxy card or voting instruction form. You can vote by one of the following methods. Please refer to the section ‘Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting’ beginning on page 58 for detailed voting instructions.

 

LOGO2


CINEMARK PERFORMANCE DURING 2020

In February 2020, we reported our 2019 performance which was the fifth consecutive year of record results for Cinemark, with the North American industry celebrating the second-highest grossing box office of all-time. Additionally, our financial performance was tracking exceptionally well at the beginning of 2020. Driven by our Continuous Improvement program and our varied strategic initiatives, on relatively flat attendance, as of February 2020 year-to-date total worldwide revenue was up 5%, Adjusted EBITDA had increased approximately 16%, and our Adjusted EBITDA margin had expanded by nearly 200 basis points compared to the same time frame in 2019. While we expected to continue our industry-leading performance, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic (COVID-19, COVID or pandemic) resulted in an unprecedented, devastating impact on our industry and our Company and we had to temporarily shift our strategy to focus primarily on cash preservation.

We temporarily closed all our theatres in the U.S. and Latin America effective March 17, 2020 and March 18, 2020, respectively, to comply with COVID related government mandates. In conjunction with the temporary closure of our theatres, we implemented various cash preservation plans such as reducing personnel and base salary, limiting non-essential operating and capital expenditures, suspending our quarterly dividend, and negotiating modified timing and/or abatement of contractual payments with landlords and other major suppliers until theatre reopenings. While we had reopened 217 of our domestic theatres and 129 of our international theatres as of December 31, 2020, we continue to work aggressively to navigate through the crisis. The demonstrated leadership of our global management team, led by Chairman and founder Lee Roy Mitchell and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mark Zoradi, in steering the Company during the pandemic is a testament to the team’s abilities and effectiveness as faithful stewards of the Company.

Listed below are some of the highlights of our achievements during 2020:

LOGO

Internet•  Rapid and extensive liquidity actions

 

LOGO

-Significantly limited non-essential spending, including temporary deep payroll cuts

Telephone-Secured additional liquidity of approximately $860 million as of year-end through capital raising transactions and compensation related relief provided by COVID related legislation

-Abated approximately $35 million of rent and deferred approximately $75 million of rent, in addition to other contractual payment obligations

•  Workforce and contract restructuring

 

LOGO-Initiated first ever Cinemark voluntary and involuntary workforce reduction program

-Permanently closed 27 lower performing theatres

Mail-Workforce reduction and theatre closures together estimated to save the Company approximately $10 million annually in overhead costs

-Extended payment terms of existing vendor contracts and temporarily eliminated minimum rent in a significant number of leases in Latin America

•  Complex reopening of theatres

 

LOGO-Organized a highly effective task force to strategically plan and execute theatre reopenings

-Defined and implemented set of new industry-leading cleaning and safety protocols branded The Cinemark Standard

•  Strategic Process Enhancements

-Redesigned a wide range of operating procedures to align with market realities including showtime, operating hours, staffing, and food and beverage offerings

-Developed a highly successful Private Watch Party concept

•  Active communication plan

-Performed extensive localized guest and public relations outreach to engage with guests and media throughout the pandemic

-Used regular Company-wide town hall meetings with employees to stay connected and boost employee morale

-Maintained 96% guest satisfaction with our health and safety protocols

-Maintained 950+K Movie Club members consistent with pre-pandemic subscription membership

 

In Person

VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

 

LOGO3


We also continued to be a leader in the industry, developing innovative ways of bringing our customers back to the movies and working closely with our peers and partners to reignite the movie exhibition business. Some of the ways Cinemark provided leadership during 2020 are provided below:

LOGO

Our strength and resiliency has been tested this past year, but we have demonstrated our ability to operate with discipline and focus. We have a distinguished and consistent track record of performance and outperformance relative to our industry peers. We benchmark our financial performance against AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC) and IMAX Corporation (IMAX), the two other publicly-held companies in our industry with whom we compete for investor capital. The following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) to Cinemark’s stockholders during the five-year period ended December 31, 2020, as well as the corresponding returns on an overall stock market index (S&P 500) and in each of AMC and IMAX.

LOGO

 

 

ItemLOGO  Description4 

Board Voting

Recommendations

Page Reference

Item 1

Election of three Class III directors to serve for three years on our Board

✓ FOR each director nominee

11

Item 2

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019

✓ FOR

27

Item 3

Annual,non-binding, advisory vote on our executive compensation program

✓ FOR

27




Item 1. ElectionBOARD LEADERSHIP AND SKILLS

Our board of Three Class III Directorsdirectors (Board) leadership structure promotes balance between independence, diversity, engaged oversight and extensive industry and operational expertise all of which drive value for Cinemark stockholders.

 

The following table provides summary information about each director nominee.

Name   Age   

Director

Since

 Occupation Experience Independent Committee
Memberships 

Benjamin Chereskin

   60 2004 President, Profile Capital Management Leadership, Consumer Products, Finance, Technology, Strategy, Governance Yes CC; SP (Chair)

Lee Roy Mitchell

   82 1987 Founder; Chairman of the Board Leadership, Finance, Strategy, Industry Expertise No NV (Chair)

Raymond Syufy

   56 2006 CEO, Syufy Enterprises Real Estate, Retail Business, Finance, Leadership, Industry Expertise, Strategy No SP; NV

CC: Compensation Committee   NV: New Ventures Committee   SP: Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

LOGO

Item 2.Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte

The Audit Committee has appointed and the Board has ratified the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (collectively, “Deloitte”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019. As a matter of good corporate governance, we are seeking stockholder ratification of the appointment of Deloitte. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte, the Audit Committee may review its future selection of auditors.

One or more representatives of Deloitte are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to answer appropriate questions.



We paid the following fees (in thousands) to Deloitte for professional services rendered by them during 2018 and 2017, respectively:

Fees 2018  2017 

Audit

 

 $

 

1,837.2

 

 

 

 $

 

1,781.0

 

 

 

Audit Related

 

 $

 

10.4

 

 

 

 $

 

10.4

 

 

 

Tax(1)

 

 $

 

66.4

 

 

 

 $

 

145.5

 

 

 

Other

 

 $

 

-

 

 

 

 $

 

-

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 $

 

                        1,914.0

 

 

 

 $

 

                  1,936.9

 

 

 

(1)    Fees primarily include transfer pricing studies and tax compliance services.

Item 3.Non-binding, Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

The Company annually requests anon-binding advisory vote from our stockholders on the compensation paid to our named executive officers (the “NEOs”), for and during the prior year. We have consistently received high stockholder approval for our executive compensation program primarily due to its strong alignment with Company financial performance. At the 2018 annual meeting, approximately 95% of our stockholders present, either in person or via proxy, and voting approved our executive compensation for 2017.

2018 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTSLOGO

Our Vision and its Execution

Our key objective is to deliver competitive returns on capital invested by the Company. We achieve this objective by implementing our visionPrinciples of shaping the motion picture industry and being recognized as the most influentialout-of-home entertainment network in the world. We also focus on our core values of integrity, trust and servant leadership. During 2018, we executed our vision by launching and making significant progress on many strategic initiatives that will benefit the Company over the long-term. We accomplished the following in 2018:

Served more than 280 million guests worldwide

Launched in December 2017, grew our U.S. subscription program, Movie Club, to more than 530,000 members, representing nearly 1,600 members per theatre and more than 2.5x our initialone-year goal

Increased recliner penetration from 45% to more than 55% of our domestic circuit - the highest recliner penetration of the major exhibitors

Launched a new XD campaign and continued to grow our XD market share generating approximately 9% of our worldwide box office from only 4% of worldwide XD screens

Increased domestic food and beverage revenue by more than $100 million, the highestone-year growth in our history and achieving 12 consecutive years of domestic per cap growth

Launched our own CNK Brazile-commerce platform and implementede-commerce platforms in Colombia, Peru and Bolivia

Expanded our worldwide footprint, through new builds and acquisitions, exceeding 6,000+ screens

Opened our first virtual reality experience at our West Plano theatre.



Additionally, over the past five years, we have grown Cinemark’s cash dividend by 36% (inclusive of the 2018 fourth quarter increase) and distributed more than $640 million to our stockholders. This demonstrates our commitment to return capital to our stockholders while continuing to invest in strategic initiatives to position our Company for long-term success. Below is our annual cash dividend paid per share of Common Stock over the past five years:

Year  Annualized Cash
Dividend Per Share
 

2014

 

  $

 

1.00

 

 

 

2015

 

  $

 

1.00

 

 

 

2016

 

  $

 

1.08

 

 

 

2017

 

  $

 

1.16

 

 

 

2018

 

  $

 

                                   1.28

 

 

 

Operational and Financial ResultsCorporate Governance

Company Performance Year-Over-Year:

We delivered worldwide records for the fourth consecutive year in many of our key performance categories in 2018. We achieved these record results through disciplined execution of our strategic initiatives focused on creating an extraordinary guest experience, coupled with outstanding film content from our studio partners.

The North American industry box office grew by 6.9% to reach anall-time high of $11.9 billion, bolstered by a sizeable increase in year-over-year attendance. Cinemark’s domesticbox-office over-indexed the North American industry box office by 80 basis points, growing 7.7%, for the full-year 2018. This follows our industry outperformance in nine out of the past ten years with the prior three years outperforming by 90, 100 and 200 basis points respectively. We also reported the fourth consecutive year ofall-time highs, including records in all of our revenue categories, that collectively delivered total worldwide revenue of more than $3.2 billion and exceeded the $3 billion mark for the first time. We accomplished these results in spite of a decline in international attendance and revenues which were adversely impacted by a Hollywood film slate with weaker consumer appeal to Latin audiences, challenging economic and political environments in certain countries in which we operate, and the impact of foreign currency exchange rates.

As compared to 2017, our worldwide performance in 2018 for key financial metrics were as follows:

Key Financial Metric   

2018

(in millions)

 

 

   

2017

(in millions)

 

 

   % Change 

Attendance

     282.1    277.0                        1.8% 

Revenue

               

Admissions

  $                    1,834.2   $                    1,795.0    2.2% 

Concessions

  $1,108.8   $1,038.8    6.7% 

Total                

  $3,221.8   $2,991.6    7.7% 

Net Income*

  $213.8   $264.2    (19%) 

Adjusted EBITDA**

  $781.5   $723.8    8.0% 


LOGO

LOGOLOGO

*Net income attributable to the Company, or Net Income, for 2018 included $19.2 million ofnon-cash tax expense associated withtrue-ups to 2017’s provisional tax reform calculations, as well as recently issued tax guidance that modified the treatment of foreign tax credit utilization and resulted in an increased valuation allowance for the Company. Additionally, net income for 2017 included a $45 million tax benefit driven by a reduction of net deferred income tax liabilities as a result of the 2017 tax reform legislation that went into effect during December 2017.

**Adjusted EBITDA is anon-GAAP financial measure. Thisnon-GAAP financial measure should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, the information provided in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). A reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA is provided in footnote 19 to the Company’s 2018 Form10-K.



Company Performance Over the5-Year Period:

The following tabular and graphical presentations below demonstrate our growth in certain key performance metrics over the past five years.

Year  Revenue   Net Income
Attributable to
Cinemark
Holdings, Inc.
   

Adjusted

EBITDA

 

2014

 

  $

 

        2,627.0

 

 

 

  $

 

        192.6

 

 

 

  $

 

            615.7

 

 

 

2015

 

  $

 

    2,852.6

 

 

 

  $

 

    216.9

 

 

 

  $

 

    682.8

 

 

 

2016

 

  $

 

    2,918.8

 

 

 

  $

 

    255.1

 

 

 

  $

 

    706.1

 

 

 

2017

 

  $

 

    2,991.6

 

 

 

  $

 

    264.2

 

 

 

  $

 

    723.8

 

 

 

2018

 

  $

 

    3,221.8

 

 

 

  $

 

    213.8

 

 

 

  $

 

    781.5

 

 

 

LOGO

LOGOLOGO

* See footnote 19 to the Company’s 2018 Form10-K for reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA.



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

The Board monitors emerging besthas adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and other corporate governance policies that relate to the composition, structure, interaction and operation of the Board. Copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and other governance documents can be found under the “Governance” tab of the “Investors” section of our website at https://ir.cinemark.com. You should review these documents for a complete understanding of these corporate governance practices, in executive compensation to incorporate them intobut some of the key elements of our compensation program and enhance value for our stockholders. Through our commitment to strong governance the Board has implemented the following compensation “best practices.”policies and practices are summarized here:

 

What We Do

What We Do Not Do

✓  Provide a competitive base salary

×   Reward imprudent risk-taking

✓  Utilize performance-based component as a significant portion of total compensation

×   Provide “single trigger” provisions in our employment agreements for change-in-control

✓  Overlap performance periods and cap incentive opportunities

×   Provide excise taxgross-ups for change-in-control payments

✓  Balance mix of pay components

×   Offer deferred compensation

✓  Align management and stockholder interests through stock ownership guidelines

×   Agree to golden parachutes

✓  Prohibit executives from engaging in hedging transactions or pledging Cinemark stock

×   Offer pension benefits

✓  Provide double-trigger for change-in-control

×   Provide excessive perks

Our Approach to Executive Compensation

We believe in taking a holistic view of pay and performance. While formulating an effective pay strategy, the Compensation Committee ensures that there is appropriate alignment with Company performance, overall business strategy and culture. The three principal tenets of our executive compensation program are: Retention, Performance and Balance.

The Compensation Committee ensures that the three tenets are appropriately represented in our compensation program by taking into consideration the following:

Key drivers of sustainable performance

Viewing value creation over multiple overlapping timeframes

Considering total compensation as one package rather than viewing each component independently

Balancing stockholder expectations by discouraging undue risk-taking and motivating executives to drive the right behaviors

Industry comparables

Highlights of 2018 Executive Compensation

Although our compensation program has consistently received a high-level of support from our stockholders (approximately 95%say-on-pay vote result in 2017), in 2018, the Compensation Committee made certain calibrations to an already robust compensation structure to more closely align with the tenets of the program.



Base Salary:designed to attract and retain key talent

The Compensation Committee adjusted the base salaries of the NEOs to better align with market and to address evolving roles of certain executives. Mr. Gamble’s base salary had a higher adjustment than the other NEOs to reflect his additional responsibilities upon being appointed as our Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) in January 2018. The change in base salaries for 2018 were as follows:

NameChange from 2017

Lee Roy Mitchell

    Up by 1.7%

Mark Zoradi

    Up by 5.3%

Sean Gamble

    Up by 14.3%

Michael Cavalier

    Up by 5.0%

Valmir Fernandes

    Up by 3.3%

Cash Bonus: designed to align with Company’s performance over the short-term

LOGOIn 2018, the Compensation Committee calibrated the cash bonus program to enhance alignment of payout with performance. The adjustments were as follows:

a. Increased the budgeted Adjusted EBITDA target for maximum payout for allnon-CEO NEOs to 110% from 108%. Mr. Zoradi’s payout has been at 110% of target since 2017. The Compensation Committee determined that raising the bar for the NEOs, as drivers of the Company’s strategy and its execution, is consistent with our compensation philosophy of pay-for-performance.

b. Tied a portion of the cash bonus payout to the Annual Business Objectives ratings (“ABO”) of the individual for the year. Composite ABO scores rate the individual’s performance against the Company’s strategic objectives and goals for the year. The ABO score is applicable to all bonus-eligible employees, including the NEOs. Based on the ABO score of the individual, a discretionary modifier up to a maximum of (+/-)15 percentage points will be applied to adjust the cash bonus payout calculation (“ABO modifier”). However, maximum bonus payout (Adjusted EBITDA-based + ABO modifier) cannot exceed 165% of the individual’s target bonus opportunity.

Adding the individual ABO as a modifier to the Adjusted EBITDA-based payout enhances the level of individual accountability while continuing to maintain a “one team” culture. Also, the individual performance modifier facilitates greater differentiation thereby strengthening our compensation program’spay-for-performance linkage.

c. Raised the target cash bonus opportunity for Messrs. Gamble and Cavalier to 90% from 85% of their respective base salary given their evolving roles and responsibilities in the Company and to align with industry peers.

Long-term Equity Awards: designed to retain talent and align with Company’s long-term performance    

LOGOThe Compensation Committee made the following changes from 2017 to incentivize performance of the NEOs over the long-term:

a. Shifted the split of performance-based and time-based equity awards, at target, for allnon-CEO NEOs to 60% performance-based and 40% time-based from the 50%/50% split in prior years.



b. Increased the target value of long-term equity incentive compensation for Mr. Zoradi to 250% from 225%, for Mr. Gamble to 175% from 150% and for Mr. Cavalier to 150% from 135% of their respective base salary.

Summary of 2018 Compensation

The charts below provide a summary of the compensation of the CEO and thenon-CEO NEOs for 2018, including a comparison of their 2018 compensation with that of 2017.

 

    CEO CompensationLOGO2018 CompensationChange from 2017

Base Salary:

$                                 1,000,000

Up by 5.3%

   

Cash Bonus:

5
 

Target cash bonus as percentage of base salary was 100%


LOGO

Environmental and Social Practices

Our corporate social responsibility practices are designed to help position Cinemark as an employer of choice to our existing and prospective employees, and a partner of choice in our communities. Though our practices are broad and will evolve over time, we are focused on our people and culture, community outreach and support, and environmental stewardship. Highlights of our current practices in these areas are described below.

 

No change

Threshold goal = 90% of target Adjusted EBITDA and maximum goal = 110% of target

No change

Threshold payout = 50% of target and maximum payout = 150% of target

No change

ABO Modifier – adjusts calculated bonus payout(+/-)15% based on individual performance

New in 2018

Equity Awards:

250% of Base Salary;

75% performance-based

25% time-based

Up from 225%

No change

No change

For thenon-CEO NEOs, the change in compensation for 2018 were as follows:

 

LOGO6


LOGO

    Non-CEO NEO

    Compensation

LOGO
  2018 Compensation7 Change from 2017


2020 Compensation Highlights

Executive compensation for 2020 was set by the Compensation Committee in February 2020, following Cinemark’s outstanding performance in 2019, and prior to the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic. Given high stockholder approval, at 96%, for the Company’s executive compensation practices in 2019, the Compensation Committee did not make any material changes to the 2020 executive compensation program.

The business environment for our Company drastically changed beginning mid-March, with the start of the pandemic. This resulted in significant impacts on our employee compensation. Some of these effects were management implemented Company-wide base salary reductions for a period of approximately five months, negation of the Company’s short-term and long-term performance-metrics which determine a significant portion of our executive compensation payout, loss of dividend income, and loss of cash value of equity awarded as long-term incentive compensation due to depressed price of our Common Stock. Many members of our management team, including the named executive officers (NEOs), opted for deeper base salary reductions than was mandatory, with Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi declining any base salary for four and two months, respectively. Our Board members also opted to forego their cash retainers for the second quarter of 2020.

Despite the very challenging business conditions, Cinemark has demonstrated its resilience, innovation and leadership as it has navigated the pandemic. This was possible because of the strategic leadership of our executive management team and incredible hard work and dedication of all our employees. Therefore, to retain, motivate and reward employees for their performance, and to compensate them for their lost pay, the Compensation Committee made certain discretion-based decisions through the year regarding equity awards and vesting. These decisions followed our core compensation objectives and served the best interests of the stockholders by ensuring the Company’s continued operation, innovation, and strategic leadership, while preserving cash and leveraging certain compensation related relief provided by COVID related legislation. The table below tracks the compensation events of 2020, both as part of the annual process as well as those driven by the pandemic.

Base Salary:
  Month  Lee Roy MitchellAll Employees  $                                 975,000Up by 1.7%CEO/Other NEOs/Board Members
Sean Gamble$                                 600,000Up by 14.3%
Michael Cavalier$                                 525,000Up by 5.0%Annual Grant

Valmir Fernandes

  February

  

$                                 525,000

•  Compensation Committee approves, for the first-time, time-based restricted stock grant with 1-year vest for all corporate employees and certain field employees, who are not typically covered under the annual grant cycle (E20 Grant); annual grant cycle for covered employees, domestic and international

  

Up by 3.3%•  Compensation Committee approves 2020 base salary, cash bonus percentage, target incentive compensation for all NEOs as part of the annual grant cycle

•  Compensation Committee sets Company targets for performance metrics for 2020

 
IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
 
Base Salary Reductions To

  

Cash Bonus:April

  

Target cash bonus as•  20% for furloughed employees

•  65% for non-furloughed corporate employees

•  50% for all theatre general managers

•  30% to 60% for international employees, percentage varying by country

•  Retention grant of base salary was

100%time-based restricted stock for Mr. Mitchell

90% for Mr. Gamble

90% for Mr. Cavalier

85% for Mr. Fernandes

Threshold goal = 90%small group of target Adjusted EBITDA and maximum goal = 110% of target

Threshold payout = 50% of target and maximum payout = 150% of target

ABO Modifier – adjusts calculated bonus payout(+/-)15% based on individual performance

critical employees

  

•  50% for all NEOs

•  Board members opt to receive no cash retainer for the second quarter

Further Base Salary Reductions To

  May

•  50% for non-furloughed corporate employees

No change•  Annual grant cycle for theatre general managers

•  0% for Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi

Up from 85%•  20% for Messrs. Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes

Up from 85%

No change

No change in threshold, but maximum goal increased from 108% of target

No change

 

 

New in 2018

LOGO8




    Non-CEO NEO

    Compensation

  Month
  2018 CompensationAll Employees  Change from 2017CEO/Other NEOs/Board Members
Base Salary Reinstatement To

  Equity Awards:July

  

Mr. Mitchell does not receive any equity awards. Target value of long-term equity as percentage of base salary was•  80% for non-furloughed corporate employees and field employees

175%•  0% for Mr. GambleMitchell

150%•  50% for Mr. CavalierZoradi

125% for Mr. Fernandes

Equity mix•  80% for Messrs. Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes

60% performance-based

40% time-based

Retention Equity Grant

  August

  

No changeCompensation Committee approves retention grants of restricted stock for all corporate employees, including NEOs (except Mr. Mitchell), and theatre general managers. The restricted stock will vest 100% in August 2022

Base Salary Reinstatement To

  September

•  All corporate employees, including all NEOs, and theatre general managers of theatres reopened, begin receiving 100% of base salary; theatre general managers of theatres closed continue to receive 80% of base salary; international employees begin receiving 80% of base salary

•  Board members begin receiving cash retainers

Bonus Equity Grant and Accelerated Vests

  December

•  Compensation Committee approves a stock bonus grant to all domestic bonus-eligible employees. The shares of Common Stock vested immediately for all grantees except for the NEOs for whom the shares are restricted with a one-year vest.

•  Compensation Committee approves accelerated vest of restricted stock scheduled to vest on or before May 2021, and certified performance shares due to vest in February 2021 for all domestic grantees

The following summary provides an overview of the executive compensation set in February 2020 and how it was impacted by the compensation decisions described above. For a detailed discussion, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) beginning on page 35.

Base Salary:

As part of the annual compensation review, in February 2020, the Compensation Committee made adjustments to the base salaries of the NEOs on the basis of factors such as market comparables, executive’s evolving role within the Company and retention. The 2020 base salaries that were set in February 2020 including the variances from 2019, and the actual base salaries earned by the NEOs during 2020 with the percentage loss due to the COVID related pay reductions were as follows:

Name 

2020 Base Salary

Approved

       Change from    
2019
 

Actual Base Salary

Received Due to
COVID-19

  

 Percentage Loss of Base 
Salary Due to Base
Salary Reductions

 

Lee Roy

Mitchell

 $            1,020,001   Up 2.0% $                            589,394       42.2%

Mark

Zoradi

 $1,100,000   No change $740,632       32.7%

Sean

Gamble

 $660,000   Up 5.6% $521,435       21.0%

Michael

Cavalier

 $555,012   Up 2.8% $440,923       20.6%

Valmir

Fernandes

 $555,012   Up 2.8% $441,633       20.4%

 

 

Up from 150%

Up from 135%

No change

Shifted from 50%/50% split

LOGO9


Cash Bonus:

In February 2020, the Compensation Mix:appropriatelybalanced between fixed (base salary and benefits) and variable components (cashCommittee set (i) the target cash bonus and long-term equity incentive awards) to reward and motivate performance without encouraging undue risk-taking

The presentations below illustrate the mix of the variable and fixed components of compensationopportunity as a percentage of base salary for each NEO and (ii) the Adjusted EBITDA target total compensation. for purposes of determining the annual cash bonus payout for the year.

Mr. Zoradi is presented individually whileGamble’s target opportunity was raised from 90% for 2019 to 100% for 2020 based on market norms, internal pay equity and his increased role and responsibilities within the Company. The cash bonus target opportunities for Messrs. Gamble,Mitchell, Zoradi, Cavalier and Fernandes are presentedremained the same as 2019.

The Adjusted EBITDA targets for the cash bonus payouts were set at $542 million for domestic, $104 million for international and $646 million for worldwide results. Given the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our Company, including circuit-wide closures both in the U.S. as well as in Latin America for a group. Since Mr. Mitchell doessignificant part of the year, the Company could not meet the Adjusted EBITDA targets. Consequently, at year-end the Compensation Committee did not approve any cash bonus payouts for 2020. However, the Compensation Committee made discretion-based equity awards equal in value to a certain percentage of the bonus-eligible employee’s cash bonus target (Bonus Equity Grant). See discussion under Discretion-based Incentive Awards Due to the Impact of COVID-19 for details regarding the Bonus Equity Grant.

The individual targets (as a percentage of base salary) for 2020 and 2019, expected target cash bonus for the year as set in February 2020 for each NEO, and the actual cash bonus earned for 2020 by each NEO was as follows:

 

Name

 

 

Target Cash Bonus

(Percentage of Base Salary)

 

 

 

Expected Target Cash
Bonus for 2020

  

 

Actual Cash
Bonus Received

 
     2020         2019    
Lee Roy Mitchell 100% 100% $               1,020,001  $                   0 
Mark Zoradi 125% 125% $               1,375,000  $0 
Sean Gamble 100%   90% $660,000  $0 
Michael Cavalier   90%   90% $499,511  $0 
Valmir Fernandes   90%   90% $499,511  $0 

Long-term Incentive Compensation:

Consistent with our compensation philosophy of driving performance, in February 2020, the Compensation Committee raised the target values of the long-term equity incentive compensation for Messrs. Zoradi and Gamble. These calibrations were deemed appropriate based on market comparables and the roles of these executives as the principal architects and drivers of the Company’s strategic growth.

The split between performance-based and time-based awards remained the same as in 2019 for all NEOs.

The target values of the long-term equity compensation for each of the NEOs for 2020 as compared to 2019 and the split between the performance-based and time-based awards were as follows:

Name

Target Long-term Equity

(Percentage of Base Salary)

 

Split Between

Performance-based and Time-based  Awards

    2020            2019                                            
Lee Roy Mitchell  N/A  N/A         N/A                  N/A         
Mark Zoradi400%275%         75%                  25%         
Sean Gamble180%175%         60%                  40%         
Michael Cavalier150%150%         60%                  40%         
Valmir Fernandes125%125%     60%                40%         

Discretion-based Incentive Awards Due to the Impact of COVID-19:

The Company’s business performance metrics for 2020 were severely impacted, beyond predictability or control, by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the Company demonstrated its resilience and leadership through exceptional organization, strategic planning and execution of operational efficiencies and business innovations that allowed it to

LOGO10


evolve and persevere in an unpredictable, ever-changing environment. To ensure the Company’s continued performance and recovery during uncertain and challenging business conditions, the Compensation Committee made certain discretion-based equity related decisions for purposes of employee retention, motivation and reward for performance, dedication and their hard work during the pandemic. These discretion-based decisions allowed the Company to appropriately address the above needs while preserving cash and leveraging certain compensation related relief provided by COVID related legislation. None of the discretion-based decisions were exclusive to the NEOs but were applicable to larger groups of employees based on the nature of the grant.

The discretion-based compensation decisions were as follows:

Retention Equity Grant: In April, the Compensation Committee approved time-based restricted stock grants to a small group of critical employees who management believed were essential to manage the sudden business crisis brought about by the pandemic. The NEOs did not receive any equityretention grant on an annual basisin April.

In August, the Compensation Committee again reviewed employee retention concerns with management in light of significant loss of cash compensation due to his substantial ownershipsalary reductions over approximately five months, potential loss of cash bonus payout for the year for bonus-eligible employees, reduction in the value of our Common Stock due to depressed stock price and the loss of dividend income. To address concerns regarding the prolonged and continued impact of COVID-19 on the industry and the Company, he has not been includedthe Compensation Committee deemed it to be in thenon-CEO Company’s best interest to review certain options to address the base salary loss of all employees without impacting the Company’s cash reserves. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee determined that it would be prudent to utilize time-based restricted stock as an effective retention tool (Retention Equity Grant). All corporate employees, including the NEOs, and theatre general managers received Retention Equity Grants. The values of the Retention Equity Grants were calculated using base pay multipliers corresponding to the pay grades of the employees. Mr. Mitchell did not receive any Retention Equity Grant.

The Retention Equity Grants will vest 100% in August 2022. The respective loss in pay and the estimated fair market value of the Retention Equity Grant for each NEO group. His compensation is 49%was as follows:

 

Name                             

 

 

Loss in Pay Amount

  

 

Fair Market Value of
Restricted Shares
@Grant Date

 

Lee Roy Mitchell

 N/A  N/A

Mark Zoradi

 $                        359,368  $                        329,997

Sean Gamble

 $                        138,565  $                        138,596

Michael Cavalier

 $                        114,089  $                        116,549

Valmir Fernandes

 $                        113,379  $                        116,549

See Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020 table on page 57 for the number of shares granted to the NEOs as Retention Equity Grant.

Bonus Equity Grant: In December, the Compensation Committee determined there would be no cash bonus payouts for 2020, but it also recognized the Company’s achievements, employee performance and strong management leadership in an exceptionally difficult business environment. Therefore, to compensate employees for their performance while preserving liquidity, the Compensation Committee made the discretion-based decision to award equity. The Compensation Committee believes the Bonus Equity Grant appropriately serves the long-term interests of the stockholders in terms of rewarding employees for performance and motivating and retaining them for continued value creation. Under the Bonus Equity Grant program, all bonus-eligible employees received immediately vested shares of Common Stock, the value of which was based, depending on the employee’s performance, within a range of 75% to 90% of the individual’s target cash bonus. The shares awarded under the Bonus Equity Grant vested immediately for all grantees, except for the NEOs for whom the award was time-based restricted stock grants with a vest period of one year from the date of grant. The NEOs (including Mr. Mitchell) received a stock grant with a fair market value of 75% of each of base salary andtheir respective target cash bonus and 1% benefits.opportunity. The Bonus Equity Grants for the NEOs will vest in December 2021.

 

   

NEO

 

 

     Variable     

 

 

     Fixed     

 

CEO

 76% 24% 

Non-CEO NEO group

 

 67%

 

 33% 

 

LOGO11


The projected cash bonus target set in February 2020 and the fair market value of the Bonus Equity Grant for each NEO was as follows:

 

Name

 

 

Projected Target
Cash Bonus as Set In
February 2020

 

 

Fair Market Value of Bonus
Equity Grant @75% of
Individual Target

Lee Roy Mitchell

 $                    1,020,001 $                       764,998

Mark Zoradi

 $                    1,375,000 $                    1,031,239

Sean Gamble

 $                       660,000 $                       494,990

Michael Cavalier

 $                       499,511 $                       374,618

Valmir Fernandes

 $                       499,511 $                       374,618

See Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020 table on page 57 for the number of shares granted to the NEOs as Bonus Equity Grant.

Accelerated Vests: In December, in addition to the Bonus Equity Grant, the Compensation Committee decided to accelerate the vests of certain equity awards granted in 2017 and 2019. These accelerated vests were deemed to be in the best interest of the Company as they provided employees with an additional source of compensation at year-end which helped motivate and reward employees for their performance while conserving cash and allowing the Company to leverage certain compensation related relief provided by COVID related legislation. The accelerated vests were as follows:

A.

All time-based restricted shares that were due to vest on or before May 2021, were accelerated to vest in December 2020. This decision impacted all employees, included those who received restricted shares for the first time in February 2020. See table on page 8. For the NEOs, these restricted shares were (i) the remaining 50% of the restricted shares granted in February 2017 and (ii) 50% of the restricted shares granted in February 2019.

B.

Performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2017 (2017 RSU) to all NEOs and certain other key employees, were also accelerated to vest in December 2020. The 2017 RSUs were certified by the Compensation Committee in February 2019 to vest at 96% of target and were due to vest in February 2021 after the satisfaction of the additional two-year service period.

See Stock Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2020 table on page 60 for number of shares of Common Stock realized upon vesting of all long-term incentive compensation during 2020. See Beneficial Ownership Table on page 68 for the total ownership numbers as of December 31, 2020.

Certification of the 2019 and 2020 performance-based awards: In February 2021, the Compensation Committee evaluated the impact of the pandemic on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR), the metric used to determine the vest of the performance-based equity compensation granted in February 2019 and 2020 (2019 and 2020 RSU Grants). Given the projected continuation of the macroeconomic conditions through 2021 and beyond, and the uncertain timing as to the recovery of our industry to a pre-COVID state, the Compensation Committee made a discretion-based decision to certify the vest of the 2019 and 2020 RSU Grants at target. See page 50 for a summary of other 2021 compensation related decisions.

 

LOGO

LOGO12




GENERAL INFORMATION

 

 

Solicitation of ProxiesSOLICITATION OF PROXIES

The Board is soliciting proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting (and any adjournment thereof) to be held virtually on May 23, 201920, 2021 at 9 a.m. CDT at the Company’s West Plano Theatre located at 3800 Dallas Parkway, Plano, TX 75093.CDT. The approximate date on which this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy are first being sent to stockholders is April 8, 2019.2, 2021.

Shares Outstanding and Voting RightsSHARES OUTSTANDING AND VOTING RIGHTS

As of the Record Date, 117,019,540119,539,989 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (Common Stock) of the Company (the “Common Stock”) were outstanding. The Common Stock constitutes the only class of voting securities of the Company. Only stockholders of record as of the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share so held.

 

 

ITEM ONE — ELECTION OF DIRECTORSCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

CompositionBOARD COMPOSITION

The majority of theour Board

Our Board is independent and is currently comprised of 10 members. The size of the Board may be fixed from time to time exclusively by our Board as provided in our Certificate of Incorporation. Our Certificate of Incorporation also provides that our Board consists of three classes of directors, designated as Class I, Class II and Class III. The members of each class are elected to serve a three-year term, with the termterms of office of each class ending in successive years.

ITEM ONE — ELECTION OF THREE CLASS II DIRECTORS

Director QualificationsANNUAL MEETING SLATE

The qualifications for Board membership are set forth in our Fourth Amendedterms of the current Class II directors, Mme. Antonellis and RestatedMessrs. Sepulveda and Zoradi expire at the Annual Meeting. All nominees have been recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Guidelines (“Corporate Governance Guidelines”). All candidatesCommittee (Governance Committee) and nominated by the Board for election at the Annual Meeting.

Each of Mme. Antonellis and Messrs. Sepulveda and Zoradi has consented to be nominated for election orre-election to the Board should possess the following qualifications:

high personal and professional ethics, integrity, practical wisdom, and mature judgment;

broad training and experience at the policy-making level in business, government, education, or technology;

expertise that is beneficial to the Company and complementary to the background and experience of other Board members;

willingness to devote the required amount of time to carrying out duties and responsibilities of Board membership;

commitment toas a Class II director. If elected, they will serve on the Board overfor a periodthree-year term expiring on the date of several yearsour 2024 annual meeting of stockholders. At this time, we have no reason to develop knowledge aboutbelieve that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. However, should any of them become unavailable or unwilling to serve before the Company’s principal operations; and

willingnessAnnual Meeting, your proxy card authorizes us to representvote for a replacement nominee if the best interests of all stockholders and objectively appraise management performance.Board names one.

LOGO13

The Nominating and Corporate


CLASS II DIRECTOR NOMINEES
TERM EXPIRING 2024

Darcy Antonellis

LOGO

Director Since: 2015

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Audit Committee; Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee

Age: 58

Other Public Company Boards: 1

Skills and Qualifications

•  Current CEO and previous executive experience

•  Critical technology and cybersecurity experience

•  Accounting and financial management expertise

Other Current Board Experience

•  Xperi

Previous Board Experience

•  Not Applicable

Professional Highlights

Since January 2014, Ms. Antonellis has been the CEO of Vubiquity, Inc., a subsidiary of Amdocs Inc. (NASDAQ: DOX), a leading software, services provider to communications and media companies. From June 1998 until December 2013, Ms. Antonellis held numerous positions at Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., (a Time Warner company) including President of Technical Operations and Chief Technology Officer.

Carlos Sepulveda

LOGO

Director Since: 2007

Nominee of: Mitchell Investors

Board Committees: Audit Committee; Compensation Committee; Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee

Lead Director

Age: 63

Other Public Company Boards: 1

Skills and Qualifications

•  Extensive public accounting experience; certified public accountant

•  CEO and executive experience

•  Strong accounting and financial oversight experience, strategic planning and management expertise

Other Current Board Experience

•  Triumph Bancorp, Inc.

Previous Board Experience

•  Matador Resources Company

Professional Highlights

Since May 2010, Mr. Sepulveda has been the Chairman of the board of directors of Triumph Bancorp, Inc. (Triumph Bancorp, NASDAQ: TBK), financial services company providing community banking, national lending and commercial finance. Prior to Triumph Bancorp, Mr. Sepulveda was the President and CEO of Interstate Battery System International, Inc. (Interstate Battery), a seller of automotive and commercial batteries, from March 2004 until April 2013 and its Executive Vice President from 1993 until March 2004. Prior to joining Interstate Battery, Mr. Sepulveda was an audit partner with the accounting firm of KPMG Peat Marwick in Austin, New York and San Francisco for 11 years.

LOGO14


Mark Zoradi

LOGO

Director Since: 2015

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: None

Age: 67

Other Public Company Boards: 1

Skills and Qualifications

•  Veteran motion picture executive with a background in distribution

•  Wealth of knowledge regarding strategic partnerships within the exhibition industry and exhibitor relationships with movie studios

•  Management and oversight experience at large public companies within the industry

Other Current Board Experience

•  National CineMedia, Inc.

Previous Board Experience

•  Not Applicable

Professional Highlights

Since August 2015, Mr. Zoradi has served as our CEO. Mr. Zoradi spent 30 years at The Walt Disney Company, a major motion picture studio, including serving as the President of Walt Disney Studios Motion Picture Group. Prior to that, Mr. Zoradi served in a variety of positions of increasing responsibility with The Walt Disney company, including as the General Manager of Buena Vista Television and President of Buena Vista International with responsibility for the international theatrical and home entertainment marketing and distribution of Disney, Touchstone and Pixar films. Mr. Zoradi also served as the President and Chief Operating Officer (COO) of Dick Cook Studios from January 2011 until July 2014 and the COO of Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. from August 2014 until January 2015.

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE

FOR

ELECTION OF EACH CLASS II NOMINEE

LOGO15


CLASS III DIRECTORS

TERM EXPIRING 2022

Benjamin Chereskin

LOGO

Director Since: 2004

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Compensation Committee; Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee (Chair)

Age: 62

Other Public Company Boards: 1

Skills and Qualifications

•  Strategic planning and finance growth opportunities

•  Extensive knowledge and experience in corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions

•  Executive compensation experience

Other Current Board Experience

•  CDW, Corporation

Previous Board Experience

•  Boulder Brands, Inc.

Professional Highlights

Mr. Chereskin is President of Profile Capital Management LLC (Profile Management), an investment management firm, which he founded in October 2009. Prior to founding Profile Management, Mr. Chereskin was a Managing Director and Member of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, a private equity firm, from 1993 until October 2009, having co-founded the firm in 1993.

Lee Roy Mitchell

LOGO

Founder

Nominee of: Mitchell Investors

Board Committees: None

Age: 84

Other Public Company Boards: 0

Skills and Qualifications

•  Depth of experience in the motion picture industry

•  Long-term historic industry perspective

•  Leadership experience, including past memberships on public company boards

Other Current Board Experience

•  Not Applicable

Previous Board Experience

•  National CineMedia, Inc.

Professional Highlights

Mr. Mitchell is the founder of the Company. He has served as Chairman of the Board since March 1996 and as a director since our inception in 1987. Mr. Mitchell has been engaged in the motion picture exhibition business for over 50 years. His depth of experience in the motion picture industry has been invaluable to the Board. Additionally, Mr. Mitchell brings a long-term historic industry perspective and leadership experience to the Board.

LOGO16


Ray Syufy

LOGO

Director Since: 2006

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee

Age: 58

Other Public Company Boards: None

Skills and Qualifications

•  Deep knowledge of the motion picture industry

•  Strategic planning expertise, particularly with respect to competition from other forms of entertainment

•  Operational expertise

Other Current Board Experience

•  Not Applicable

Previous Board Experience

•  Not Applicable

Professional Highlights

Mr. Syufy began working for Century Theatres, Inc. (Century Theatres), a regional movie exhibitor, in 1977, and held positions in each of the major departments within Century Theatres. In 1994, Mr. Syufy was named President of Century Theatres and was later appointed CEO and Chairman of the board of directors of Century Theatres. Mr. Syufy resigned as an officer and director of Century Theatres upon the consummation of our acquisition of Century Theatres in 2006. Since then, Mr. Syufy has presided as CEO of Syufy Enterprises, Inc. (Syufy Enterprises) a retail and real estate holding company with operations in California, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, and Texas.

LOGO17


CLASS I DIRECTORS
TERM EXPIRING 2023

Nancy Loewe

LOGO

Director Since: 2017

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Audit Committee (Chair and Financial Expert); Governance Committee

Age: 53

Other Public Company Boards: 0

Skills and Qualifications

•  Accounting and financial management expertise

•  Risk oversight experience

•  Previous management and oversight experience at large public companies

•  Management and executive experience

Other Current Board Experience

•  Not Applicable

Previous Board Experience

•  Not Applicable

Professional Highlights

Ms. Loewe has been the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of Weyerhaueser Company, one of the world’s largest private owners of timberlands, since 2021. Prior to that, Ms. Loewe was a Senior Vice-President - Finance of Visa, Inc. (Visa), a multinational financial services corporation, since March 2019. Prior to Visa, Ms. Loewe served as the CFO for Kimberly-Clark International and prior to that she was the Chief Strategy Officer and Global Treasurer for Kimberly-Clark Corporation, a multinational personal care corporation. She has also served as Vice President and CFO of Frito Lay North America. Additionally, Ms. Loewe held numerous positions during her 20-year tenure at GE, inside and outside the U.S., including Vice President - Strategic Transactions & Cash, as well as CFO for varying business units, such as Plastics Asia, Healthcare, and Consumer & Industrial.

LOGO18


Steven Rosenberg

LOGO

Director Since: 2008

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Governance Committee (Chair)

Age: 62

Other Public Company Boards: 1

Skills and Qualifications

•  Risk management, board governance and general management expertise

•  Accounting and financial management expertise

•  Management experience

Other Current Board Experience

•  Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.

Previous Board Experience

•  Not Applicable

Professional Highlights

Mr. Rosenberg is the Manager of SPR Ventures Inc., a private investment firm he founded in 1997. He was the President of SPR Packaging LLC, a manufacturer of flexible packaging, from 2006 to 2018.

Enrique Senior

LOGO

Director Since: 2004

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee

Age: 77

Other Public Company Boards: 2

Skills and Qualifications

•  Extensive knowledge of film, media and entertainment, and beverage industries

•  Strong strategic planning and management expertise

•  Executive experience

Other Current Board Experience

•  Group Televisa S.A.B.; Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.

Previous Board Experience

•  Not Applicable

Professional Highlights

Mr. Senior is a Managing Director of Allen & Company LLC, a boutique investment bank, and has been employed by the firm since 1972. He has served as a financial advisor to several corporations including Coca-Cola Company, General Electric, CapCities/ABC, Columbia Pictures and QVC Networks.

LOGO19


Nina Vaca

LOGO

Director Since: 2014

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Governance Committee; Compensation Committee (Chair);

Age: 49

Other Public Company Boards: 1

Skills and Qualifications

•  Wealth of leadership and business experience particularly with regards to information technology and e-commerce

•  Governance and executive compensation knowledge

•  Management and executive experience

Other Current Board Experience

•  Comerica, Inc.

Previous Board Experience

•  Kohls, Corp.

Professional Highlights

Ms. Vaca is the founder, Chairman and CEO of the Pinnacle Group of companies, including Pinnacle Technical Resources, Inc. (together, Pinnacle) and Vaca Industries, Inc. Founded in 1996, Pinnacle is an information technology services and solutions provider.

NOMINATIONS FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD

Our Governance Committee (the “Governance Committee”)is responsible for identifying and recommending director candidates to our Board for nomination. This is an ongoing process through which the Board has added three new directors – Mmes. Antonellis and Loewe and Mr. Zoradi - since 2015. These directors have not only added to the Board’s portfolio of skills in finance, accounting, leadership experience and industry knowledge but have also particularly supplemented the experience in the information technology and cybersecurity areas.

Although the Board retains ultimate responsibility for approving candidates for election, the Governance Committee conducts the initial screening and evaluation. The Governance Committee has not established any minimum qualifications that must be met by a director candidate or identified any set of specific qualities or skills that it deems to be mandatory. Based on the director qualifications discussed under Board Diversity and Director Qualifications, the Governance Committee’s goal is to maintain a mix of different viewpoints such that the Company benefits from the fresh perspectives brought by new directors and the institutional knowledge and industry insights of directors having longer experience on our Board. The Governance Committee’s policy regarding consideration of potential director nominees acknowledges that choosing a director is dependent upon a number of subjective and objective criteria many of which are difficult to categorize. The Governance Committee considers candidates recommended by current directors, management, third party search firms engaged by the Governance Committee, and stockholders. Under the director nomination agreement which we entered into on April 9, 2007 with certain of our then current stockholders (Director Nomination Agreement), the Mitchell Investors (as defined in the Director Nomination Agreement) have a right to designate two nominees to the Board. Mr. Sepulveda is a nominee of the Mitchell Investors. All candidates, including candidates recommended by stockholders, are evaluated on the basis of the same criteria. Stockholders who wish to recommend a candidate to the Governance Committee or submit nominees for election at the 2022 annual meeting should follow the instructions on page 74.

BOARD LEADERSHIP

Lead Independent Director

Mr. Sepulveda serves as the Board’s Lead Independent Director (Lead Director). The Lead Director has the authority to preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is responsiblenot present, including executive sessions of the

LOGO20


non-management directors and has the authority to call meetings of the non-management directors. The Lead Director serves as principal liaison between the non-management directors and Company management. In consultation with the Chairman and the CEO, the Lead Director approves meeting schedules and agendas and the information provided to the Board. If requested by stockholders and as appropriate, the Lead Director will also be available, as the Board’s liaison, for nominating members toconsultation and direct communication.

Separation of Chairman and CEO Roles

Although the Board does not assign specific weighthave a formal policy on separation of the roles of the CEO and Chairman, we have kept these positions separate since 2007. Separating the Chairman and CEO roles allows us to develop and implement corporate strategy that is consistent with the Board’s oversight role, while facilitating strong day-to-day executive leadership. Mr. Mitchell provides leadership to the Board by chairing meetings, organizing directors and facilitating Board deliberations. His in-depth knowledge of the motion picture industry for more than five decades and his long-standing relationships within the industry provide the Board an invaluable resource and leadership particularly in the area of strategic initiatives, including evaluating new diversification and growth opportunities.

The Board believes that its leadership structure is appropriate for Cinemark. Through the role of the Lead Director, the independence of the Board’s standing committees, and the regular use of executive sessions of the non-management directors, the Board is able to maintain independent oversight of risks to our business, our long-term strategies, annual operating plan, and other corporate activities. These features, together with the role and responsibilities of the Lead Director described above, ensure a full and free discussion of issues that are important to Cinemark’s stockholders. At the same time, the Board is able to take advantage of the unique blend of leadership, experience and knowledge of our industry and business that Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Zoradi separately bring to the table.

BOARD INDEPENDENCE

The majority of our Board is independent with 7 out of 10 directors being independent. We comply with the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards. The test for independence under the NYSE listing standards is whether the director

1.            is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of the Company, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of the Company;

2.            has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any particular factor when evaluating candidatestwelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from the Company (other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for potential Board nominations. prior service, provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);

3.            (a) is a current partner or employee that is the Company’s internal or external auditor; (b) has an immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm; (c) has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such firm and personally works on the Company’s audit; or (d) is or an immediate family member was within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time;

4.            is, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of the Company’s present executive officers at the same time serves or has served on that company’s compensation committee; or

5.            is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

LOGO21


The Board in coordination with our Governance Committee, and assistance of the Company’s general counsel, followed the NYSE bright-line tests and considered the transactions reported under the Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions to determine the independence of the Board members. On the basis of this review, the Board affirmatively determined, in its business judgment, that (a) the majority of the Board was, and continues to be, independent, (b) each of Mmes. Antonellis, Loewe and Vaca and Messrs. Chereskin, Rosenberg, Senior and Sepulveda are independent, (c) Messrs. Mitchell and Syufy are not independent due to their transactions with the Company exceeding $120,000 annually, (d) Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi are not independent because they are employees of the Company, (e) each of Mmes. Antonellis and Loewe and Messrs. Rosenberg and Sepulveda meet all applicable requirements for membership in the Audit Committee, (f) Ms. Loewe and Mr. Sepulveda qualify as “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC and satisfy the NYSE’s financial experience requirements, and (g) each of Ms. Vaca and Messrs. Chereskin and Sepulveda meet all applicable requirements for membership in the Compensation Committee.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Our Board has adopted a written policy supplementing our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics relating to the review, approval and ratification of transactions between us and “related parties” as generally defined by applicable rules under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The policy covers any related party transaction in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000. Our Board has determined that the Audit Committee is best suited to review and approve related party transactions, although in certain circumstances the Board may determine that a particular related party transaction be reviewed and approved by a majority of disinterested directors. In reviewing and approving a related party transaction, the Audit Committee, after satisfying itself that it has received all material information regarding the related party transaction under review, shall approve based upon the determination whether the transaction is fair and in the best interest of the Company.

Management presents any proposed related party transaction at an Audit Committee meeting for review and approval. If management becomes aware of a proposed or existing related party transaction that has not been presented or pre-approved by the Audit Committee, management shall promptly notify the Chair of the Audit Committee who shall submit such related party transaction to the full Audit Committee for approval or ratification, if the Audit Committee determines that such transaction is fair to the Company. If management, in consultation with our CEO, CFO or General Counsel determines that it is not practicable to wait until the next Audit Committee meeting, the Chair of the Audit Committee has been delegated the authority to review, consider and approve any such transaction. In such event, the Chair of the Audit Committee shall report any related party transaction approved by him or her at the next Audit Committee meeting. The Audit Committee may establish guidelines it determines as necessary and appropriate for management to follow in dealings with related parties and related party transactions. The procedures followed in considering a related party transaction are evidenced in the resolutions and minutes of the meetings of the Audit Committee or Board, as applicable.

The Company has the following related party transactions with Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Syufy.

Laredo Theatre

We manage theatres for Laredo Theatre, Ltd., (Laredo). We are the sole general partner and own 75% of the limited partnership interests of Laredo. Lone Star Theatres, Inc. (Lone Star) owns the remaining 25% of the limited partnership interests in Laredo and is 100% owned by Mr. David Roberts, Lee Roy Mitchell’s son-in-law. Under the agreement, management fees are paid by Laredo to us at a rate of 5% of annual theatre revenues up to $50 million and 3% of annual theatre revenues in excess of $50 million. We recorded approximately $0.15 million of management fee revenue from Laredo during 2020. As the sole general partner and the majority limited partner of Laredo, we control the affairs of the limited partnership and have the rights to dissolve the partnership or sell the theatres. We also have a license agreement with Laredo permitting Laredo to use the “Cinemark” service mark, name and corresponding logos and insignias in Laredo, Texas.

LOGO22


Copper Beech LLC

Effective September 2, 2009, Cinemark USA, Inc. (CUSA), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement (Aircraft Agreement), with Copper Beech Capital, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (Operator), for the use of an aircraft and flight crew on a time sharing basis. Lee Roy Mitchell, our Chairman of the Board, and his wife, Tandy Mitchell own the membership interests of the Operator. Prior to the execution of the Aircraft Agreement, the Company had an informal agreement with the Operator to use, on occasion, a private aircraft owned by the Operator. The private aircraft is used by Mr. Mitchell and other executives who accompany Mr. Mitchell to business meetings for the Company. The Aircraft Agreement specifies the maximum amount that the Operator can charge the Company under the applicable regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration for the use of the aircraft and flight crew. The Company pays the Operator the direct costs and expenses related to fuel, pilots, landing fees, storage fees, insurance obtained for the specific flight, flight planning, weather contract services and expenses such as in-flight food and beverage services and passenger ground transportation incurred during a trip. For 2020, the aggregate amounts paid to Copper Beech LLC for the use of the aircraft was approximately $10,000.

FE Concepts, LLC

The Company, through its wholly-owned indirect subsidiary CNMK Texas Properties, LLC, formed a joint venture, FE Concepts, LLC (FE Concepts), with AWSR Investments, LLC (AWSR), an entity owned by Lee Roy Mitchell and Tandy Mitchell. FE Concepts operates a family entertainment center that offers bowling, gaming, movies and other amenities. The Company and AWSR each invested approximately $20.0 million and each have a 50% voting interest in FE Concepts. The Company has a theatre services agreement with FE Concepts under which the Company receives management fees for providing film booking and equipment monitoring services for the facility. The Company recorded $0.34 million of management service fees during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Family Relationships

Walter Hebert III, brother-in-law of Mr. Mitchell, is the Executive Vice President – Purchasing of the Company. Mr. Hebert received a total compensation of $519,860 for 2020. Such amount included base salary of $244,624, fair market value of annual restricted stock grant of $114,980, cash value of retention grant of $43,122, cash value of bonus equity of $86,240, and all other compensation of $30,894.

Tandy Mitchell, wife of Mr. Mitchell, participated in the voluntary workforce reduction program and is no longer an employee of the Company. Ms. Mitchell’s compensation for 2020 was $145,875.

Century Theatres

Our subsidiary, Century Theatres, currently leases 14 theatres and one parking facility from Syufy Enterprises or affiliates of Syufy Enterprises. Raymond Syufy, one of our directors, is an officer of the general partner of Syufy Enterprises. All of the leases except one have fixed minimum annual rent. The remaining lease has rent based upon a specified percentage of gross sales as defined in the lease with no minimum annual rent. For 2020, we paid approximately $24 million in rent for these leases. Since 2019, we began providing digital equipment support to drive-in theatres owned by Syufy Enterprises. We recorded $0 of management fees related to these services during 2020.

Director Nomination Agreement

Under the Director Nomination Agreement which we entered into on April 9, 2007 with certain of our then current stockholders, the Mitchell Investors (as defined in the Director Nomination Agreement) have a right to designate two nominees to the Board and Messrs. Mitchell (Class III) and Sepulveda (Class II) are its current nominees.

LOGO23


BOARD DIVERSITY AND DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines contain Board membership criteria which are set as broad tenets rather than as specific weighted criteria. To carry out its responsibilities and set the appropriate tone at the top, our Board is keenly focused on its leadership structure, and the character, integrity, and qualifications of its members. Our directors have a proven record of accomplishment and an ability to exercise sound and independent judgment in a collegial manner.

Our Board does not have a formal diversity policy. It broadly construes diversity to mean diversity of backgrounds, experience, qualifications, skills, age and expertise, among other factors, which when taken together best serve our Company and our stockholders. The following presentation highlights some of the diversity metrics of our Board.

LOGO

In selecting board members, the Board takes into account, such factors as it deems appropriate, which may includein addition to the current composition of the Board,core attributes, the range of talents, experiencesexperience and skillsexpertise that are needed and would best complement those alreadythat are currently represented on the Board and the need for specialized expertise.Board. The Board seeks to achieve a mix of members whose experience and backgrounds are relevant to the Company’s strategic priorities and the scope and complexity of the Company’sour business.

Our directors complement each other in their mix of skills by bringing to the Board expertise and experience on the entertainment industry, capital markets, financial management, real estate, cybersecurity, technology, strategic planning and corporate governance. Additionally, in selecting Board members, our Governance Committee follows applicable regulations to ensure that our Board includes members who are independent, possess financial literacy and expertise, an understanding of risk management principles, policies, and practices, and can appropriately oversee and guide management.

Core Director Attributes

LOGO  High personal and professional ethics and integrity

LOGO  Strong business judgment

LOGO  Experience beneficial to the Company

LOGO  Proven leadership and management skills

LOGO  Broad training and experience at the policy-making level

LOGO  Dedicated—able to devote necessary time to oversight duties and represent stockholders’ interests

LOGO  Commitment to serve for a period of several years to develop knowledge about the Company

LOGO24


Board Diversity

The Board has not adopted a formal diversity policy. Pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board broadly construes diversity to mean diverse background, education, skills, age and expertise. Our Board is comprised of directors who bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, exhibit a variety of skills, professional experience and backgrounds, and effectively represent the interests of our stockholders. The directors complement each other in their mix of skills by bringing to the Board expertise and experience on the entertainment industry, capital markets, cybersecurity, technology, financial management, strategic planning and corporate governance.

The following chart summarizes the core competencies of each director.

 

Skill/Experience Matrix

Experience

 

 Director

 

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

     
 LOGO
 LOGO LOGO LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO

LOGOLOGOLOGO
           

Financial Literacy

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

          

Financial ManagementManagement/Corporate Finance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          

Accounting and Financial Oversight/Enterprise Risk Management

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

          

Corporate Governance

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  
          

CEO Positions Held

Experience

 

 

     

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          

Non-CEO Executive PositionsExperience

 

   

 

 

 

       
          

Film, Media and Entertainment Industry

Knowledge

 

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

Beverage Industry, Consumer Products

Corporate Finance

          

Mergers and Acquisitions

 

   

        
          

Other Public Company Board Service

 

   

 

   

 

 

          

Leadership

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          

Strategic Vision and Planning

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          

Real EstateInformation Technology and Retail BusinessCybersecurity

 

               

Information Technology and Cybersecurity

 

  

Nominations for ElectionBOARD OVERSIGHT OF RISK

Throughout 2020, governance and risk management played a critical role in our response to the COVID-19 pandemic. As we confronted the challenges to our industry, we implemented operational teams to oversee daily decision-making to ensure our actions remained consistent with our priorities and in compliance with government mandates. The Board played a pivotal oversight role in our business continuity planning and execution in the face of the pandemic and oversaw the management by our executive team of risks related to continuing business operations, industry, financial controls, liquidity, employee retention, health and safety and IT operations.

Our Board believes that risk management is an important part of establishing, updating and executing Cinemark’s business strategy. The Governance CommitteeBoard, as a whole and at the committee level, has oversight responsibility relating to risks that could affect the corporate strategy, business objectives, compliance, operations and the financial condition and performance of ourthe Company. The Board receives nominations for Board members which it evaluates basedfocuses its oversight on the standards, qualificationsmost significant risks facing the Company and diversity criteria set forth byon the processes that the Board in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Governance Committee annually evaluates the criteria for the selection of new directorshas established to identify, prioritize, assess, manage and recommends any proposed changes to the Board. Althoughmitigate those risks.

Annually, and if needed more frequently, the Board retains ultimate responsibility for approving candidates for election, the Governance Committee conducts the initial screeningreviews and evaluation. In doing so, the Governance Committee considers candidates recommended by the directors, the CEOCinemark’s long-term strategic plan and the Company’s stockholders.its annual financial and operating plan. The Governance CommitteeBoard and its committees also has the authority, to the extent it deems appropriate, to retain one or more search firms to be used to identify director candidates.

While typically the Governance Committee recommends candidates to the full Board, under the director nomination agreement which we entered intoreceive regular reports from members of senior management on April 9, 2007 with certainareas of our then current stockholders (the “Director Nomination Agreement”), the Mitchell Investors (as defined in the Director Nomination Agreement) have a right to designate two nominees to the Board. The nominees of the Mitchell Investors however, must fulfil the membership criteria set by the Board under the Corporate Governance Guidelines. Currently, Messrs. Mitchell (Class III) and Sepulveda (Class II) are the nominees of the Mitchell Investors.

To recommend a candidate for election to the Board for the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, a stockholder must submit the following informationmaterial risk to the Company, Secretary no later than 90including strategic, operational, financial, legal and no earlier than 120 days in advance ofregulatory risks. While the anniversary date of this Annual Meeting:

Board has an oversight role, management is principally tasked with direct responsibility for managing and assessing the namerisks and address of the stockholder of recordimplementing processes and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made;

a representation that the stockholder intendscontrols to appear in person or by proxy at the annual meeting;

the number of shares of capital stock of the Company that are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made;

a description of any arrangements or understandings between the stockholder, the beneficial owner and the nominee or any other person (includingmitigate their names);

the name, age, business and residential addresses of the stockholder’s nominee for director;

the biographical and other information about the nominee (including the number of shares of capital stock of the Company owned beneficially or of record by the nominee) that would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); and

the nominee’s consent to be named as a nominee and to serveeffects on the Board.

Candidates recommended by stockholders will be evaluated on the basis of the same qualifications discussed above as candidates recommended by existing directors and the CEO.

Annual Meeting Slate

The terms of the current Class III directors, Messrs. Chereskin, Mitchell and Syufy expire at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Mitchell has been nominated by the Mitchell Investors for election at the Annual Meeting. Messrs. Chereskin and Syufy have been recommended by the Governance Committee and nominated by the Board for election at the Annual Meeting.

Each of Messrs. Chereskin, Mitchell and Syufy has consented to be nominated forre-election to the Board as a Class III director. If elected, they will serve on the Board for a three-year term expiring on the date of our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders. At this time, we have no reason to believe that either Messrs. Chereskin, Mitchell or Syufy will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. However, should any of them become unavailable or unwilling to serve before the Annual Meeting, your proxy card authorizes us to vote for a replacement nominee if the Board names one.

Information on each of our nominees and continuing directors is given below.

NOMINEES FOR CLASS III DIRECTORS

Term Expiring 2019

LOGO

Benjamin D. Chereskin,60

Director Since: April 2004

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Compensation Committee; Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee (Chair)

Other Public Company Boards: CDW, Corporation; Boulder Brands, Inc. (2013-2016)

Professional Experience: Mr. Chereskin is President of Profile Capital Management LLC (“Profile Management”), an investment management firm, which he founded in 2009. Prior to founding Profile Management, Mr. Chereskin was a Managing Director and Member of Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, a private equity firm, from 1993 until 2009, havingco-founded the firm in 1993.

Qualifications: Mr. Chereskin’s background in private equity is a valuable resource to us in our efforts to attract capital, which helps us implement our business strategies and finance growth opportunities. His knowledge and experience in corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate governance contributes to the Board’s expertise on strategic planning and provides valuable input on executive compensation matters.

Company.

 

 

LOGOLOGO  

Lee Roy Mitchell,82

Director Since: Founder

Nominee of: Mitchell Investors

Board Committees: Executive Chairman of the Board; New Ventures Committee (Chair)

Other Public Company Boards: National CineMedia, Inc. (“NCMI”)

25

Professional Experience: Mr. Mitchell is


The Board’s leadership structure, with a Lead Director, separate Chairman and CEO, independent Board standing committees, the founderactive participation of committees in the oversight of risk, and open communication with management support the risk oversight function of the Company. HeBoard. Each committee has served as Chairman of the Board since March 1996risk oversight responsibilities and as a director since our inception in 1987.

Qualifications: Mr. Mitchell has been engaged in the motion picture exhibition business for over 50 years. His depth of experience in the motion picture industry has been invaluableprovides regular reports to the Board. Additionally, Mr. Mitchell brings a long-term historic industry perspective and leadership experience to the Board.

LOGO

Raymond W. Syufy,56

Director Since: October 2006

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee; New Ventures Committee

Other Public Company Boards: None

Professional Experience: Mr. Syufy began working for Century Theatres, Inc. (“Century Theatres”), a regional movie exhibitor, in 1977, and held positions in each of the major departments within Century Theatres. In 1994, Mr. Syufy was named President of Century Theatres and was later appointed CEO and Chairman of the board of directors of Century Theatres. Mr. Syufy resigned as an officer and director of Century Theatres upon the consummation of our acquisition of Century Theatres in 2006. Since then Mr. Syufy has presided as CEO of Syufy Enterprises, a retail and real estate holding company with operations in California, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, and Texas.

Qualifications: Mr. Syufy’s experience in managing a successful, family-owned movie theatre business brings to the Board industry insight and operational experience. Mr. Syufy’s background also brings key strategic planning expertise to the Board, particularly with respect to competition from other forms of entertainment.

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR ELECTION OF EACH CLASS III NOMINEE

CONTINUING CLASS I DIRECTORS

Term Expiring 2020

LOGO

Nancy Loewe,51

Director Since: June 2017

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Audit Committee; Governance Committee

Other Public Company Boards: None

Professional Experience: From 2011 until 2017, Ms. Loewe served in a variety of positions of increasing responsibility with Kimberly-Clark Corporation and its international subsidiary, including serving as the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) for Kimberly-Clark International and Chief Strategy Officer and Global Treasurer for Kimberly-Clark Corporation. Additionally, Ms. Loewe has held numerous positions during her20-year tenure at GE, inside and outside the U.S., including Vice President – Strategic Transactions & Cash, as well as CFO for varying business units, such as Plastics Asia, Healthcare, and Consumer & Industrial.

Qualifications: Ms. Loewe’s accounting and financial management expertise has added to the Board’s skillset of strategic planning and financial decision making. Due to her experience in leading large financial teams and financial management including audit,Our risk and treasury, she provides guidance and direction to the Company on accounting and financial processes and management.

LOGO

Steven P. Rosenberg, 60

Director Since: April 2008

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Audit Committee; Governance Committee (Chair)

Other Public Company Boards: Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.; PRGX Global, Inc. (2007-2014)

Professional Experience: From 1997 until 2018, Mr. Rosenberg was the President of SPR Ventures Inc., a private investment firm he founded in 1997. He was also the President of SPR Packaging LLC, a manufacturer of flexible packaging, from 2006 until 2018.

Qualifications: Mr. Rosenberg’s background in corporate leadership, private entrepreneurial investment and public company management brings to the Board strategic planning, risk management, board governance and general management skills that are critical to the implementation of our growth strategies and oversight of our enterprise and operational risk management. His experience in accounting and financial management, having served in corporate leadership positions and on audit committees of other public companies, is valuable to the Board with respect to the oversight of our financial reporting.

LOGO

Enrique F. Senior,75

Director Since: April 2004

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee; New Ventures Committee

Other Public Company Boards: Grupo Televisa S.A.B.; Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A

Professional Experience: Mr. Senior is a Managing Director of Allen & Company LLC, a boutique investment bank, and has been employed by the firm since 1972. He has served as a financial advisor to several corporations including Coca-Cola Company, General Electric, CapCities/ABC, Columbia Pictures and QVC Networks.

Qualifications: Mr. Senior’s experience in financial advisory services has given him extensive knowledge of the film, media and entertainment and beverage industries. Mr. Senior’s experience has brought key insight into these two critical components of the Company’s business. He also provides strategic guidance to the Board.

LOGO

Nina G. Vaca (Ximena Humrichouse),47

Director Since: November 2014

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Governance Committee; Compensation Committee (Chair)

Other Public Company Boards: Comerica, Inc., Kohls, Corp. (2010-2019)

Professional Experience: Ms. Vaca is the founder, Chairman and CEO of the Pinnacle Group of companies, including Pinnacle Technical Resources, Inc. (together “Pinnacle”). Founded in 1996, Pinnacle is an information technology services and solutions provider.

Qualifications: Ms. Vaca is a successful entrepreneur and brings to the Board a wealth of leadership and business expertise, especially with regard to information technology ande-commerce. Her experience as a director of other public companies adds to the governance skill set of the Board particularly in the area of executive compensation.

CONTINUING CLASS II DIRECTORS

Term Expiring 2021

LOGO

Darcy Antonellis, 56

Director Since: July 2015

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: Audit Committee

Other Public Company Boards: XPERI Corporation

Professional Experience: Since 2014, Ms. Antonellis has been the CEO of Vubiquity, Inc. (“Vubiquity”), the largest global provider of premium content services and technical solutions serving clients in 37 countries and reaching more than 100 million households. Prior to Vubiquity, Ms. Antonellis held numerous positions at Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., (a Time Warner company) including President of Technical Operations and Chief Technology Officer.

Qualifications: Ms. Antonellis’s background in engineering and experience in technology and cybersecurity is invaluable to the Board. In addition to her management experience in the positions of CEO and senior executive of one of the largest studios, her success in digital media, as well as her strong understanding of our industry helps provide strategic guidance to our Board in the area of digital marketing.

LOGO

Carlos M. Sepulveda, 61

Director Since: June 2007

Nominee of: Mitchell Investors pursuant to the Director Nomination Agreement

Board Committees: Audit Committee (Chair and financial expert); Compensation Committee; Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee; lead independent director

Other Public Company Boards: Triumph Bancorp Inc.; Matador Resources Company (2013-2017)

Professional Experience: Since 2010, Mr. Sepulveda has been the Chairman of the board of directors of Triumph Bancorp, Inc. (“Triumph Bancorp”), a bank holding company with interests in wholesale banking, commercial finance and real estate investments. Prior to Triumph Bancorp, Mr. Sepulveda was the President and CEO of Interstate Battery System International, Inc. (“Interstate Battery”), a seller of automotive and commercial batteries. Prior to joining Interstate Battery, Mr. Sepulveda was an audit partner with the accounting firm of KPMG Peat Marwick in Austin, New York and San Francisco for 11 years.

Qualifications: Mr. Sepulveda’s extensive public accounting background provides the Board critical financial and accounting expertise. As a certified public accountant with proven management and leadership skills and having served as the CEO of a major corporation, Mr. Sepulveda brings to the Board strong accounting and financial oversight skills coupled with experience in strategic planning and enterprise and operational risk management.

LOGO

Mark Zoradi, 65

Director Since: June 2015

Nominee of: Board

Board Committees: New Ventures Committee

Other Public Company Boards: None

Professional Experience: Since 2015, Mr. Zoradi has served as our CEO. Mr. Zoradi spent 30 years at The Walt Disney Company, including serving as the President of Walt Disney Studios Motion Picture Group. Prior to that, Mr. Zoradi served in a variety of positions of increasing responsibility with The Walt Disney Company, including as the General Manager of Buena Vista Television and President of Buena Vista International with responsibility for the international theatrical and home entertainment marketing and distribution of Disney, Touchstone and Pixar films. Mr. Zoradi also served as the President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of Dick Cook Studios from 2011 until 2014 and the Chief Operating Officer of Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. from 2014 until 2015.

Qualifications: A veteran motion picture executive with a background in distribution, Mr. Zoradi brings a wealth of knowledge to the Board with regards to strategic partnerships and relationships with the movie studios. Additionally, his experience in operations of large entertainment industry companies brings management expertise to the Board.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board oversees our executive management, reviews our long-term strategic plans and exercises oversight over all major decisions.

Board Leadership Structure

We believe that a key factor in a company’s performance is a leadership structure that provides a balance between independent oversight by an engaged Board andday-to-day operations by management to implement the Board’s strategic vision. To achieve this balance, we have split the roles of the Chairman of the Board and the CEO such that the Board is separated from theday-to-day operations of the Company.

In addition to the separation of the positions of the Chairman of the Board and the CEO, the Board has a lead independent director, which role provides leadership and an organizational structure to thenon-management directors. The position of the lead independent director has the following significant authority and responsibilities under our Corporate Governance Guidelines:

to act as a liaison between thenon-management directors and the Company’s management;

to call meetings ofnon-management directors;

chair the executive sessions ofnon-management directors;

chair Board meetings when the Chairman is not present;

consult with the Chairman and the CEO and approve the schedules, agendas and information provided to the Board for each meeting;

be available for consultation and communication with stockholders upon request; and

provide the Chairman and the CEO with the results of the Board’s annual performance review.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Responsibility for risk oversight rests with the Board. The Board has oversight responsibility of the processes established to identify, report and mitigate material risks applicable to the Company, including strategic, competitive, economic, operational, financial, legal, regulatory, compliance, and reputational risks. In addition, Board committees oversee and review risk areas that are particularly relevant to their respective areas of responsibility and oversight. The risk oversight responsibility of the Board and its Committees is supported by our management reporting processes, which are designed to provide visibility to the Board to those Company personnel responsible for risk assessment, and information about management’s identification, assessment and mitigation strategies for critical risks. While the Board considers risk in all its decisions, it also recognizes that appropriate and measured risk-taking may be required for the Company to retain its competitiveness and increase stockholder value.

The Board implements its risk oversight function both as a whole and through delegation to certain Board committees. The risk management function of the various committees is as follows:

 

Board
Audit Compensation
 Governance

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Oversight of overall risks. Oversight of the Company’s risk management and risk
mitigation processes.

•  AssessesAUDIT COMMITTEE

Oversees risks related to financial controls and accounting risk exposures and management’s risk management procedures to address those risks

•  Reviews and assess information technology
reporting, internal controls, IT and cybersecurity, risk exposures
ethics and the steps taken to monitor and control those exposures

•  Reviews risks, identified during the external auditor’ risk assessment procedures.compliance

  

•  COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Oversees risk managementrisks related to employee compensation planspolicies, practices, incentive-related risks and arrangements

•  Assesses whether the Company’s compensation plans and practices may incentivize excessive risk-taking. The Compensation Committee has determined that the risks arising from the Company’s compensation plans and policies are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

succession planning

  

•  GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Manages risks associated with governance structurestructures, policies and processes

•  Oversees succession planning

In order to provide oversight of the risks associated with strategic planning and business development initiatives, the Board has established two additional committees, the Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee and the New Ventures Committee. The Strategic Long- Range Planning Committee assists management in the analysis of alternative strategic options and reviews with management key industry and market issues and external developments impacting the Company. The New Ventures Committee monitors the strategic direction of the Company. It evaluates new development programs or business growth and diversification opportunities within established strategic plan targets and applicable regulatory boundaries.

Director Independence

We comply with the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”). The NYSE bright-line tests for independence are whether the director:

1.

is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of the Company, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of the Company;

2.

has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from the Company (other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service, provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);

 3.

STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE

Oversees and advises on risks related to alternative
strategic options and external developments

(a) is a current partner or employee that is the Company’s internal or external auditor; (b) has an immediate family member who is a current partnerMANAGEMENT

Responsible for identification, assessment and
mitigation of such a firm; (c) has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such firm and personally works on the Company’s audit; or (d) is or an immediate family member was within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time;risks

4.

is, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of the Company’s present executive officers at the same time serves or has served on that company’s compensation committee; or

5.

is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

With the assistance of the Company’s legal counsel, the Governance Committee and the Board reviews the NYSE Standards for Board and committee member independence. On the basis of this review, the Board has affirmatively determined, in its business judgment, that (a) the majority of the Board was, and continues to be, independent, (b) each of Mmes. Antonellis, Loewe and Vaca and Messrs. Chereskin, Rosenberg, Senior and Sepulveda are independent, (c) Mr. Syufy is not independent due to him being a current employee of Syufy Enterprises that receives payment from the Company exceeding the greater of $1 million or 2% of it’s consolidated gross revenues, (d) Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi are not independent because they are employees of the Company, (e) each of Mmes. Antonellis and Loewe and Messrs. Rosenberg and Sepulveda meet all applicable requirements for membership in the Audit Committee, (f) Mr. Sepulveda is an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of RegulationS-K promulgated by the SEC and satisfies the NYSE’s financial experience requirements, and (g) each of Ms. Vaca and Messrs. Chereskin and Sepulveda meet all applicable requirements for membership in the Compensation Committee.

Meeting AttendanceMEETING ATTENDANCE

During 2018,2020, the Board held four (4)six (6) meetings and took action by written consent on six (6)four (4) occasions. All directors attended at least seventy-five percent (75%) of all meetings held by the Board and all meetings held by committees of the Board on which such director served.

All directors are strongly encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting, but we do not have a formal attendance requirement. AllEight directors except Mr. Senior, attended the annual meeting held in May 2018.our virtual 2020 Annual Meeting.

Executive SessionsEXECUTIVE SESSIONS

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the rules of the NYSE, ournon-management directors meet periodically in executive sessions with no Company personnel present. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require separate sessions of thenon-management directors at least twice a year.

The presiding director of the executive sessions is currently our lead independent director,Lead Director, Mr. Sepulveda. During 2018,2020, ournon-management directors met twicefour times and our independent directors met once in executive sessions.

Stockholder CommunicationsINVESTOR OUTREACH

We value the input and insights of our stockholders and are committed to continued engagement with our investors. As part of our proactive stockholder engagement program to ensure management and the Board understand and consider the issues that matter the most to our stockholders, we offered meetings to our top institutional investors, representing nearly 60% of our stockholder base. We held meetings with all that accepted our request, totaling more than 20% of the total shares outstanding. Key themes discussed included the impact of COVID-19 on our industry and the Company, succession planning for the Board, executive compensation and corporate social responsibility and sustainability. Our corporate governance profile reflects the input of stockholders from our outreach efforts.

LOGO26


STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

As stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any Company stockholder or other interested party who wishes to communicate with thenon-management directors as a group may direct such communications by writing to the:

Company Secretary

Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

3900 Dallas Parkway Suite 500

Plano, TX 75093

The communication must be clearly addressed to the Board or to a specific director. If a response is desired, the individual should also provide contact information such as name, address and telephone number.

All such communications will be reviewed initially by the Company Secretary. The Company Secretary will forward to the appropriate director(s) all correspondence, except for items of the following nature:

 

advertising;

promotions of a product or service;

patently offensive material; and

matters completely unrelated to the Board’s functions, Company performance, Company policies or that could not reasonably be expected to affect the Company’s public perception.

The Company Secretary will prepare a periodic summary report of all such communications for the Board. Correspondence not forwarded to the Board will be retained by the Company and will be made available to any director upon request.

Corporate Governance PoliciesOUR ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PRACTICES

Sustainability Initiatives:

We have an ongoing commitment to promote environmental sustainability in our communities, including reducing our carbon footprint through energy efficient measures and Chartersreducing waste through co-mingled recycling programs. We have been recognized and awarded for our sustainability efforts and are currently listed on the EPA Green Power Partner National Top 100 list. Since 2019, through Virtual Power Purchase Agreements and Renewable Energy Credits earned via contracts in deregulated markets, we have been able to offset some of our annual electricity usage through renewable options. We also recycle at all eligible locations and in 2019 diverted approximately 27% of our waste from landfills. Since 2012, we have recycled 60,000 tons of waste. In select locations, we also compost certain waste material. We have incorporated LED lighting in whole or in part in most theatres and parking lots. We also have energy management systems in place for automated lighting and HVAC controls to ensure energy efficiency. We also engineer our HVAC units to minimize energy waste and to reduce power consumption. As of December 31, 2020, we have three LEED certified theatres.

Our Passion for People:

Our employees form the core of our Cinemark Values. We seek to be an equitable, diverse and inclusive company. We are committed to diverse representation across all levels of our workforce to reflect the vibrant and thriving diversity of the communities in which we live and work. As part of our ongoing commitment to a diverse and inclusive workforce, we have organized conscious inclusion training sessions for our leadership teams, theatre general managers and our employees at the Service Centre. To facilitate discussions regarding diversity and inclusion, we have arranged for external speakers to speak at our town halls. We also support employee-driven support groups (ERGs) which help foster inclusion among all teammates, build awareness, recruit and retain a diverse workforce necessary for the Company to successfully operate in a global, multicultural, and evolving business environment. We support the continuous development of professional, technical and leadership skills of our employees by offering tuition assistance, skills development courses through partnerships with leading educational institutions, and leadership development and training both generally and as part of our diversity and inclusion initiatives.

LOGO27


The Company understands that continuous engagement with its employees is vital to driving successful, meaningful outcomes. To foster a corporate culture of transparency and collaboration, senior management conducts regular “town-hall” style meetings with employees to share, among other matters, Company performance, business conditions and market challenges, and respond to employee concerns through question-and-answer sessions. These meetings were particularly important during 2020 to keep our employees informed of the impact of the pandemic on our Company and our business, status of the industry and that of the theatre reopenings. It also promoted motivation and boosted morale. We also conduct employee satisfaction surveys that provide actionable feedback from employees to management. The survey responses are anonymous, measure employee satisfaction, and solicit honest feedback. We also conduct annual performance reviews with bi-annual check-ins for all full-time employees, during which employees and managers address goals, developmental opportunities, strengths, and weaknesses. These reviews facilitate productive conversations across the organization and an open feedback culture.

In recognition and gratitude for our moviegoing communities, we strongly encourage team members to give back to the community. For the past several years, we have held annual service days for team members. We are a proud long-term corporate partner with charities such as Variety the Children’s Charity, Will Rogers Motion Pictures Pioneers Foundation and St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and host an annual golf tournament to raise funds for selected charities.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICIES AND CHARTERS

The following documents make up our corporate governance framework:

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines;

Amended and Restated Charter of the Audit Committee (the “Audit(Audit Committee Charter”)Charter);

Charter of the Governance Committee (the “Governance(Governance Committee Charter”)Charter); and

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Compensation Committee Charter (the “Compensation(Compensation Committee Charter”)Charter).

Current copies of the above policies and guidelines are available publicly on the Company’sour website athttp:https://investors.cinemark.comir.cinemark.com/ under the “Corporate Governance”“Governance” tab.

Code of Business Conduct and EthicsCODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

The Company has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to directors, executive officers and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth the Company’s policies on critical issues such as conflicts of interest, insider trading, protection of our property, business opportunities and proprietary information. We will post on our website any amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for executive officers and directors that have been approved by our Board or any Board committee. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website athttp:https://investors.cinemark.comir.cinemark.com/ under the “Corporate Governance”“Governance” tab.

LOGO28


BOARD COMMITTEES

Our Board currently has fivethree standing committees – Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and the Governance Committee,Committee. In addition, the Board has the Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee and theCommittee. The Board has temporarily disbanded its New Ventures Committee.Committee given its focus on strategic planning. The current composition of each of the committees is set forth below:

 

  Name of Director        Audit              Compensation            Governance            Strategic      
Planning
      New Ventures      

Darcy Antonellis

Member

Benjamin Chereskin

MemberChair

Nancy Loewe

MemberMember

Lee Roy Mitchell

Chair

Steven Rosenberg

MemberChair

Enrique Senior

MemberMember

Carlos Sepulveda

ChairMemberMember

Raymond Syufy

MemberMember

Nina Vaca

ChairMember

Mark Zoradi

-----

  Audit Committee

Number of Meetings Held During 2018: 4

Number of Decisions by Consent During 2018: 1

Each of the Audit Committee members satisfies the standards for independence of the NYSE and the SEC as they relate to audit committees. Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Mr. Sepulveda, a licensed certified public accountant with extensive public company accounting experience, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of RegulationS-K promulgated by the SEC. See Mr. Sepulveda’s biography on page 18 for further information regarding his qualifications to be an “audit committee financial expert”.

The Audit Committee is governed by the Audit Committee Charter which sets forth the purpose and responsibilities of this committee.

Functions:

The functions of the Audit Committee include the following:

assisting the Board in its oversight responsibilities regarding (1) the integrity of our financial statements, (2) our risk management compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) our systems of internal control and (4) our accounting, auditing and financial reporting processes generally, including the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent registered public accountants;

approving the report required by the SEC for inclusion in our annual proxy or information statement;

appointing, retaining, compensating, evaluating and replacing our independent registered public accountants;

approving audit andnon-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accountants;

establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and resolution of complaints regarding accounting, internal control or auditing matters submitted confidentially and anonymously by employees through the whistleblower hotline; and

performing such other functions as the Board may from time to time assign to the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee meets on a quarterly basis with Company management and Deloitte, to discuss, among other items, the earnings press release related to the quarter and the year (as applicable), the Company’s financial statements for the applicable period and any changes in significant accounting policies and its impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee also meets, on a periodic basis, with Deloitte in executive sessions without the presence of members of management.

As part of the Board’s duty of risk oversight, the Board has delegated authority of cybersecurity oversight to the Audit Committee. To monitor and evaluate the cybersecurity threats and the effectiveness of the Company’s controls to address those risks, the Audit Committee is updated by Company management twice a year.

The Board has also delegated its authority to approve related party transactions to the Audit Committee. The Company’s written policy regarding approval of related party transactions provides that management must present to the Audit Committee all potential related party transactions including the nature of the transaction, material terms and the maximum dollar value of the transaction. The Audit Committee approves based upon the determination whether the transaction is fair and in the best interest of the Company. See Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions on page 57 for further details on the approval of related party transactions.

Approval of Audit andNon-Audit Services:

The Audit Committee approves all audit and permissiblenon-audit services (including the fees and terms of the services) performed for the Company by its independent registered public accounting firm prior to the time that those services are commenced. The Audit Committee may, when it deems appropriate, form and delegate this authority to asub-committee consisting of one or more Audit Committee members, including the

authority to grantpre-approvals of audit and permittednon-audit services. The decision of suchsub-committee is presented to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting. The Audit Committeepre-approved all fees for 2018 noted in the table below.

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:

We paid the following fees (in thousands) to Deloitte and its affiliates for professional services rendered by them during 2018 and 2017, respectively:

Fees  2018   2017 

Audit

 

  $

 

1,837.2

 

 

 

  $

 

1,781.0

 

 

 

Audit Related

 

  $

 

10.4

 

 

 

  $

 

10.4

 

 

 

Tax(1)

 

  $

 

66.4

 

 

 

  $

 

145.5

 

 

 

Other

 

  $

 

-

 

 

 

  $

 

-

 

 

 

Total

 

  $

 

                    1,914.0

 

 

 

  $

 

                  1,936.9

 

 

 

(1) Fees primarily include transfer pricing studies and tax compliance services.

Audit Committee Report

Our committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited financial statements for 2018. We have discussed with Deloitte the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, and Related and Transitional Amendments to PCAOB Standards. We have received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte as required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and have discussed with Deloitte its independence. Based on the review and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements for the Company be included in the Company’s 2018 Form10-K for filing with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted,

Carlos Sepulveda (Chair)

Steven Rosenberg

Darcy Antonellis

Nancy Loewe

  Compensation Committee

Number of Meetings Held During 2018: 3

Number of Decisions by Consent During 2018: 4

Each member of the Compensation Committee satisfies the standards for independence of the NYSE as they relate to compensation committees, qualify as “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and“non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule16b-3 promulgated under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Compensation Committee is governed by the Compensation Committee Charter, which sets forth the purpose and responsibilities of this committee.

Functions

The functions of the Compensation Committee include the following:

making recommendations to the Board on the Company’s general compensation philosophy and objectives and on all matters of policy and procedures relating to executive compensation;

reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the CEO’s compensation, and determining and approving the CEO’s compensation level;

determining and approving the compensation of the other executive officers;

administering (to the extent such authority is delegated to the Compensation Committee by the Board) the incentive compensation and equity-based plans and recommending to the Board any modifications of such plans;

validating and approving the achievement of performance levels under the Company’s incentive compensation plans;

reviewing, recommending, and discussing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) section included in the Company’s annual proxy statement; and

developing a succession planning program for the CEO and senior management.

  Governance Committee

Number of Meetings Held During 2018: 5

Number of Decisions by Consent During 2018: 1

The Governance Committee is composed solely of directors who satisfy all criteria for independence under the rules of the NYSE. The Governance Committee is governed by the Governance Committee Charter setting forth the purpose and responsibilities of this committee.

Functions

The functions of the Governance Committee include the following:

identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and evaluate candidates for Board membership, including those recommended by stockholders in compliance with the Company’sby-laws;

recommending to the Board the director nominees for election or to fill any vacancies and newly created directorships on the Board;

identifying and recommending to the Board members qualified to fill any vacancies on a committee of the Board;

developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines and reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of such guidelines at least annually;

overseeing the Board’s annual self-evaluation process and the Board’s evaluation of management;

periodically reviewing the criteria for the selection of new directors to serve on the Board and recommending any proposed changes to the Board for approval;

periodically reviewing and making recommendations regarding the composition and size of the Board;

periodically reviewing and making recommendations regarding the composition, size, purpose, structure, operations and charter of each of the Board’s committees, including the creation of additional committees or elimination of existing committees;

annually recommending to the Board the chairpersons and members of each of the Board’s committees; and

reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of the Governance Committee Charter on an annual basis and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The compensation of thenon-employee directors for 2018 was governed by our Third Amended and RestatedNon-Employee Director Compensation Policy (the “Director Compensation Policy”) adopted by the Board in February 2017. Anon-employee director is one who is not (i) an employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries, or (ii) an employee of any of the Company’s stockholders which has contractual rights to

nominate directors. Therefore, as Company employees, Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi do not receive any compensation for their services on the Board or any of its committees. See the compensation tables beginning on page 42 for the compensation paid to Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi.

Eachnon-employee director received the following annual cash retainers, as applicable, for services as a Board member during 2018:

(a)

a base director retainer of $60,000;

(b)

additional retainer of $35,000 for thenon-employee director who serves as the lead independent director;

(c)

additional cash retainer for services on the committees as follows:

   

Committee

 

 

     Chairperson     

 

  

     Member     

 

 

Audit

 

 $

 

20,000

 

 

 

 $

 

10,000

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 $

 

15,000

 

 

 

 $

 

10,000

 

 

 

Governance

 

 $

 

10,000

 

 

 

 $

 

7,500

 

 

 

Strategic Long-Range Planning

 

 $

 

10,000

 

 

 

 $

 

5,000

 

 

 

New Ventures

 

 $

 

10,000

 

 

 

 $

 

5,000

 

 

 

Annual cash retainers are paid in four equal quarterly installments at the end of each quarter for services rendered during the quarter. All directors are reimbursed for travel related expenses incurred for each Board meeting they attend.

In addition to the annual cash retainers, thenon-employee directors receive an annual grant of restricted stock valued at $115,000. The number of shares of restricted stock is determined by dividing $115,000 by the closing price of Common Stock on the grant date, rounded down to the nearest whole share. The annual awards fully vest on the first anniversary of the grant date subject to continued service to the Company through the vest date.

The following table sets forth summary information regarding the compensation of ournon-employee directors for 2018.

     
Name 

Fees Earned or

      Paid in Cash(1)       

        Stock Awards(2)        

         All Other

    Compensation(3)              

       Total                     

Darcy Antonellis

 

 $

 

70,000

 

 

 

 $

 

 114,986

 

 

 

 $ 3,861  $

 

 188,847

 

 

 

Benjamin Chereskin

 

 $

 

80,000

 

 

 

 $

 

114,986

 

 

 

 $

 

3,861

 

 

 

 $

 

198,847

 

 

 

Nancy Loewe

 

 $

 

77,500

 

 

 

 $

 

114,986

 

 

 

 $

 

3,861

 

 

 

 $

 

196,347

 

 

 

Steven Rosenberg

 

 $

 

80,000

 

 

 

 $

 

114,986

 

 

 

 $

 

3,861

 

 

 

 $

 

198,847

 

 

 

Enrique Senior

 

 $

 

70,000

 

 

 

 $

 

114,986

 

 

 

 $

 

3,861

 

 

 

 $

 

188,847

 

 

 

Carlos Sepulveda

 

 $

 

130,000

 

 

 

 $

 

114,986

 

 

 

 $

 

3,861

 

 

 

 $

 

248,847

 

 

 

Raymond Syufy

 

 $

 

70,000

 

 

 

 $

 

114,986

 

 

 

 $

 

3,861

 

 

 

 $

 

188,847

 

 

 

Nina Vaca

 

 $

 

82,500

 

 

 

 $

 

114,986

 

 

 

 $3,861  $

 

201,347

 

 

 

(1)

Includes all annual cash retainers, as applicable.

(2)

The grant date fair values were calculated based upon the closing price of Common Stock on June 15, 2018 of $35.81 per share. This calculation is in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

See Note 15 to the Company’s 2018 Form10-K, for discussion of the assumptions used in determining the grant date fair values of these share based awards, including forfeiture assumptions and the period over which the Company will recognize compensation expense for such awards.

At December 31, 2018, each of the directors owned 3,211 shares of restricted stock. SeeSecurity Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management table on page 55 for total stock ownership of each of the directors.

(3)

The amounts reported are dividends paid during 2018 on the shares of unvested restricted stock granted in 2017 and 2018.

ITEM TWO — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE AS OUR

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2019

The Audit Committee has appointed and the Board has ratified the appointment of Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019. As a matter of good corporate governance, we are seeking stockholder ratification of the appointment of Deloitte. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte, the Audit Committee may review its future selection of auditors. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

One or more representatives of Deloitte are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to answer appropriate questions. Please refer to page 24 for the fees paid to Deloitte in 2018 and 2017.

Unless marked to the contrary, proxies received will be voted “FOR” ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTEFOR RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2019.

ITEM THREE — ANNUAL ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Summary

Our Board believes that we have created a compensation program that is tied to performance, aligns with stockholder interests and merits stockholder approval. Accordingly, we are seeking approval of the compensation paid to our NEOs(“say-on-pay”) for 2018 as disclosed in this proxy statement, the CD&A, the compensation tables and the narrative discussion following the compensation tables. Our executive compensation program has consistently received high stockholder approval. At the 2018 annual meeting, approximately 95% of our stockholders present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting, approved our executive compensation program and the compensation paid to our NEOs for 2017.

How did we perform?

✓Fourth consecutive year ofall-time highs, including records in all revenue categories

✓Total worldwide revenues exceeding $3 billion for the first time

✓Domestic box office over-indexing North American box office by 80 basis points

✓Increasing domestic food and beverage revenue by more than $100 million, the highestone-year growth in our history and achieving 12 consecutive years of domestic per cap growth

✓Outperforming industry for nine out of the past ten years

How do we determine pay?

✓Design pay programs to reward for Company performance and business unit results

✓Set pay levels commensurate with performance and the need to attract and retain talent

✓Focus on key drivers of sustainable performance

✓View value creation over multiple overlapping timeframes

✓Consider total compensation as one package rather than viewing each component independently

✓Balance stockholder expectations by motivating executives to drive the right behaviors and discouraging undue risk-taking

What did we change from 2017?

✓  Increased base salaries between 1.7% and 5.3% for all NEOs except Mr. Gamble for whom the increase was 14.3% to reflect his appointment as COO and to align with market

✓  Introduced individual performance payout multiplier to provide “clear line of sight” between individual and Company performance

✓  Raised performance hurdle for cash bonus maximum payout fornon-CEO NEOs to 110% from 108%; Mr. Zoradi’s maximum payout target has been 110% since 2017

✓  Raised target cash bonus opportunity for Messrs. Gamble and Cavalier to 90% of their respective base salary given their evolving roles within the Company and to better align with industry peers

✓  Shifted split of performance-based and time-based equity awards fornon-CEO NEOs to 60%/40% in favor of performance-based from 50%/50%; Mr. Zoradi’s mix had been 75%/25% since 2017

✓  Increased target value of long-term equity incentive compensation for Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble and Cavalier to 250%, 175% and 150% of their base salary respectively, to increase emphasis on long-term value creation

How did we pay our NEOs?

✓  Payouts aligned with 2018 performance

✓  Base salaries align with each NEOs role, responsibility and experience and market median

✓  Due to higher hurdle for maximum payout, cash bonus payout for NEOs was at 106.3% of individual target opportunity

✓  Equity to vest over the long-term - time-based awards vesting 50% on second anniversary and 50% on fourth anniversary of grant date; performance-based awards earned based on IRR overtwo-year performance period and vesting after additional two years of employment

✓  No excessive perks for any of our NEOs

How do we address risk and governance?

✓  Provide appropriate balance of short-term and long-term compensation

✓  Follow practices that promote good governance with maximum payout caps for incentive compensation

✓  Policies on anti-pledging, anti-hedging, stock ownership guidelines and insider trading

✓  Annualsay-on-pay stockholder vote

Why stockholders should approve thesay-on-pay proposal

✓  2018 Company financial performance continues to drive value for stockholders

✓  2018 payouts align with performance

✓  Performance bars raised for NEOs compared tonon-NEOs under the cash bonus and long-term equity incentive award programs

✓  Robust corporate governance following industry best practices

Our NEOs covered by the executive compensation program for 2018 were the following executives:

  Name

        Age    

Position                                                     

Lee Roy Mitchell

82

Executive Chairman of the Board

Mark Zoradi

65

Chief Executive Officer; Director

Sean Gamble

44

Chief Operating Officer; Chief Financial Officer

Michael Cavalier

52

Executive Vice President-General Counsel and Secretary

Valmir Fernandes

58

President-Cinemark International

Lee Roy Mitchell is the founder of the Company. He has served as our Chairman of the Board since March 1996 and as a director since our inception in 1987. Mr. Mitchell has been engaged in the motion picture exhibition business for over 50 years. Mr. Mitchell is the husband of Tandy Mitchell, an employee of the Company, and thebrother-in-law of Walter Hebert III, the Executive Vice President–Purchasing, of the Company. Mr. Mitchell currently serves on the board of directors of NCMI.

Mark Zoradi has served as our director since June 2015 and our CEO since August 2015. Mr. Zoradi spent 30 years at The Walt Disney Company, including serving as the President of Walt Disney Studios Motion Picture Group. Prior to that, Mr. Zoradi served in a variety of positions of increasing responsibility with The Walt Disney Company, including as the General Manager of Buena Vista Television and President of Buena Vista International with responsibility for the international theatrical and home entertainment marketing and distribution of Disney, Touchstone and Pixar films. Mr. Zoradi also served as the President and COO of Dick Cook Studios from January 2011 until July 2014 and the COO of Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. from August 2014 until January 2015.

Sean Gamblehas served as our COO and CFO since January 2018 and as our Executive Vice President and CFO since August 2014. Prior to joining Cinemark, from February 2009 until April 2014, Mr. Gamble worked for the Comcast Corporation as Executive Vice President and CFO of Universal pictures within NBCUniversal, one of the world’s leading media and entertainment companies. He joined Comcast after 15 years at the General Electric Company where he held multiple senior leadership positions, including CFO of GE Oil & Gas Equipment business based in Florence, Italy from May 2007 until January 2009.

Michael Cavalierhas served as our Executive Vice President-General Counsel and Secretary since February 2014 and as our Senior Vice President-General Counsel and Secretary since January 2006. He has been with Cinemark for 25 years.

Valmir Fernandeshas served as our President of Cinemark International, L.L.C. since March 2007 and has been with Cinemark for more than 20 years.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Philosophy

Our executive compensation program is structured to attract, motivate, reward and retain high caliber talent who will lead the Company to increase our competitive advantage and deliver sustainable profitability. This includes building a solid foundation for long-term growth while consistently achieving near-term results. While formulating an effective pay strategy, the Compensation Committee takes a holistic view of pay and performance and ensures that there is appropriate alignment with Company performance, overall business strategy and culture. The three principal tenets of our executive compensation program are: Retention, Performance and Balance.

We have built our compensation program using traditional compensation elements of base salary, cash bonus and long-term equity awards. The chart below identifies the hallmarks of our executive compensation program:

Characteristics

Description

Competitive Base Salary

Base salary is aligned with industry median to retain valued employees

Balanced Mix of Pay

Components

The target compensation mix is not overly weighted towards short-term cash bonus but is balanced with long-term equity-based compensation vesting over four years

Balanced Approach to

Performance-based Awards

Performance targets are tied to multiple financial metrics of the Company as well as individual performance

Overlap of Performance Periods and Vesting Schedules

The performance periods for long-term equity incentive awards overlap and, therefore, reduce the motivation to maximize performance in any one period

Stock Ownership Guidelines

CEO required to own, directly or indirectly, Company equity five times base salary; other NEOs to own two times the respective base salary

Hedging in or Pledging Common Stock Prohibited; No Margin Account

NEOs prohibited to trade in puts, calls or other derivative securities with respect to Company securities and short sales of Company securities. They may not also hold Company securities in a margin account, and may not, without prior approval, pledge Company securities as collateral for any other loan

2018 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

The Company has delivered record results for the stockholders over the past few years. This has been possible due to disciplined execution of our strategic initiatives led by our executive leadership. We have tailored our executive compensation program such that our executives continue to be motivated to perform and deliver stellar performance without having to undertake undue risks that would impact long-term stockholder value. The discussion below tracks our financial performance over the pastone- and five- years and also our performance as compared to our peers.

Company Performance Over the1-Year Period

In 2018, the North American industry box office grew by 6.9% to reach anall-time high of $11.9 billion, bolstered by sizeable increase in year-over-year attendance. Cinemark’s domestic box office over-indexed the North American industry box office by 80 basis points, growing 7.7%, for the full-year 2018. This follows our industry outperformance of 90, 100 and 200 basis points respectively for the prior three years and nine out of the past ten years of industry outperformance. We also reported the fourth consecutive year ofall-time highs, including records in all of our revenue categories, that collectively delivered total worldwide revenues of more than $3.2 billion, exceeding the $3 billion mark for the first time.

As compared to 2017, our performance in 2018 in these key financial metrics were as follows:

Worldwide

(in millions)

 

 

2018

(in millions)

 

 

2017

(in millions)

 

             % Change    

Attendance

 

 

282.1

 

 

277.0

 

 

1.8%

 

Revenue

 

      

Admissions

 

 

$                          1,834.2

 

 

$                         1,795.0

 

 

                2.2%

 

Concessions

 

 

$                          1,108.8

 

 

$                         1,038.8

 

 

                6.7%

 

Total                

 

 

$                          3,221.8

 

 

$                         2,991.6

 

 

                7.7%

 

Net Income*

 

 

$                             213.8

 

 

$                            264.2

 

 

                (19%)

 

Adjusted EBITDA**

 

 

$                             781.5

 

 

$                            723.8

 

 

                8.0%

 

*Net income for 2018 included $19.2 million ofnon-cash tax expense associated withtrue-ups to 2017’s provisional tax reform calculations, as well as recently issued tax guidance that modified the treatment of foreign tax credit utilization and resulted in an increased valuation allowance for the Company. Additionally, net income for 2017 included a $45 million tax benefit driven by a reduction of net deferred income tax liabilities as a result of the 2017 tax reform legislation that went into effect during December 2017.

**Adjusted EBITDA is anon-GAAP financial measure. Thisnon-GAAP financial measure should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, the information provided in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA is provided in footnote 19 to the Company’s 2018 Form10-K.

Company Performance Over the5-Year Period

The following tabular and graphical presentations below demonstrate our growth in certain key performance metrics over the past five years.

Year  Revenue   

Net Income
Attributable to
Cinemark
Holdings, Inc.

 

   Adjusted EBITDA 

  2014

 

  $

 

        2,627.0

 

 

 

  $

 

        192.6

 

 

 

  $

 

            615.7

 

 

 

  2015

 

  $

 

2,852.6

 

 

 

  $

 

216.9

 

 

 

  $

 

682.8

 

 

 

  2016

 

  $

 

2,918.8

 

 

 

  $

 

255.1

 

 

 

  $

 

706.1

 

 

 

  2017

 

  $

 

2,991.6

 

 

 

  $

 

264.2

 

 

 

  $

 

723.8

 

 

 

  2018

 

  $

 

3,221.8

 

 

 

  $

 

213.8

 

 

 

  $

 

781.5

 

 

 

Our Performance As Compared to Our Peers

We also compare our performance to our direct competitors that were publicly-held during the fiscal year (“Theatre Peers”) in terms of Total Stockholder Return (“TSR”). Our Theatre Peers for 2018 included the

two currently publicly-held companies in our industry, namely, AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC) and IMAX Corporation (IMAX). For purposes of evaluating our fiscal performance over five years as of FYE 2018, we believe that this peer group is an appropriate benchmark since we directly competed with these companies for business and investor capital. While we do also compete with Regal Cinemas (“Regal”), we do not have comparable TSR metrics for Regal given its acquisition by Cineworld, a privately-held company, as of December 2017.

As compared to our Theatre Peers, our TSR (with dividends reinvested) for theone-year and cumulative three-year and cumulative five-year periods as of FYE 2018 has been as follows:

   1 Yr. TSR   3 Yr. TSR   5 Yr. TSR 

Cinemark

 

  

 

6.5%    

 

 

 

  

 

17.6%    

 

 

 

  

 

24.0%    

 

 

 

AMC

 

  

 

(4.4%)    

 

 

 

  

 

(33.2%)    

 

 

 

  

 

(15.2%)    

 

 

 

IMAX

 

  

 

(18.7%)    

 

 

 

  

 

(47.1%)    

 

 

 

  

 

(36.2%)    

 

 

 

S&P 500

 

  

 

(4.4%)    

 

 

 

  

 

30.4%    

 

 

 

  

 

50.3%    

 

 

 

Theatre Peers

 

  

 

(13.1%)    

 

 

 

  

 

(41.5%)    

 

 

 

  

 

(27.6%)    

 

 

 

Our cumulative total return between FYE 2013 and FYE 2018 as compared to our Theatre Peers and S&P 500 is presented below:

LOGO

DESIGN OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The design of our executive compensation program is consistent with the compensation structure used in our industry:

base salary;

performance-based cash bonus;

long-term equity incentive awards;

standard benefits; and

limited perks

Base salary and benefits are the only fixed components of our compensation program. Cash bonus and long-term equity incentive awards are the variable/performance-based components of our compensation. We believe the allocation between fixed and variable/performance-based components offers a competitive compensation program while appropriately mitigating risk.

The following chart summarizes the components and associated objectives of our executive compensation program:

Pay ElementObjectivePerformance Metric and
Payment

  Fixed

AnnualBase Salary

Retain executive talent and recognize individual’s role and responsibilities

Individual performance and market competitiveness

  Variable

AnnualCash BonusAchieve annual goals measured in terms of Company and individual performance

Adjusted EBITDA

@Threshold, Target, Maximum

Pro rata payment

Long-Term

Restricted StockRetain executive talent and align with long-term interest of stockholders

Increase in value of Common Stock

Time-based; 4 year vesting

Restricted Stock UnitsValidate Company’s investment decisions and ensure alignment with long-term value creation

Based on achievement of IRR hurdles

Pro rata payment based on 2 year Company performance + 2 year service

ANALYSIS OF THE DESIGN OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Tenet 1 - Retention

Base Salary

Base salary component of our compensation program is designed to attract and retain key talent. Base salaries are determined by the Compensation Committee based on a variety of factors including:

Nature and responsibility of the position;

Expertise of the executive and competition in the market for the executive’s services;

Potential for driving the Company’s success in the future;

Peer Group compensation data;

Performance reviews and recommendations of the CEO (except in the case of his own compensation); and

Other judgmental factors deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has not adopted any formula with specific weightings assigned to any of the factors above. The Company has employment agreements with each NEO according to which the Compensation Committee annually reviews the base salaries, which can be increased but not decreased.

In February 2018, as part of the annual compensation review process, the Compensation Committee considered factors relevant to determining an executive’s compensation such as the NEO’s role in Company management, performance in prior years, leadership in implementing Company’s strategic goals and initiatives and contribution to the Company’s overall business. In addition, our compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer, provided to the Compensation Committee the appropriate market data for comparison. Based on such review, the Compensation Committee adjusted the base salaries of the NEOs for 2018 to better align with market and to address the evolving role of certain executives in Company management. Mr. Gamble’s base salary had a higher adjustment than the other NEOs to reflect his additional responsibilities upon appointment as our COO in January 2018. The base salaries for 2018 and the changes from 2017 were as follows:

NameBase SalaryChange from 2017    

Lee Roy Mitchell

$

975,000

Up by 1.7%

Mark Zoradi

$

                1,000,000

Up by 5.3%

Sean Gamble

$

600,000

Up by 14.3%

Michael Cavalier

$

525,000

Up by 5.0%

Valmir Fernandes

$

525,000

Up by 3.3%

Tenet 2: Performance

Cash Bonus

We provide participants to our cash bonus program an opportunity to earn a cash bonus tied to annual Company performance, measured againstpre-established performance metrics set for the year by the Compensation Committee. This opportunity is intended to compensate participants for achieving short-term financial and operational goals of the Company with individual targets based on the participant’s position and potential contribution to the achievement of the Company’s goals. As discussed later, beginning 2018, payout is also subject to an upward or downward adjustment based on the individual’s ABO rating which ties individual contribution to Company performance. The cash bonus related goals are established in writing by the Compensation Committee, with the expectation that attainment of these goals would require significant effort in light of the business environment.

How does the cash bonus program work?

Per the terms of our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee sets the Company’s target performance metric for the year and the target cash bonus for the year within the first 90 days of the fiscal year.

A participant’s target cash bonus is a percentage of his/her base salary. In setting the target cash bonus percentages of each NEO, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration market data and such other factors as deemed relevant, such as the individual’s potential contribution to the Company’s performance, the individual’s prior performance, overall market conditions, market variables in a specific sector, and recommendations from the CEO (except for himself).

Each participant is entitled to receive a ratable portion of the participant’s target cash bonus based upon the Company’s level of achievement, within the range of threshold and maximum percentages, of the target performance metric set by the Compensation Committee. The actual amount of cash bonuses paid, if any, may result in a cash bonus that is greater or less than the stated individual target (and could be zero) depending on whether, and to what extent, the applicable performance metric and other conditions are satisfied.

How does the Compensation Committee set the Company’spre-established performance metric?

The Compensation Committee sets the cash bonus target based upon the Company’s budgeted Adjusted EBITDA which is regarded as a key performance indicator of a company in our industry and is highly correlated to long-term stockholder value. The cash bonus achievement is determined using the Company’s reported Adjusted EBITDA with certainadd-backs and adjustments for cash bonus accruals, certain severance payments, if any, unusual expenses such as those related to accounting changes and a +/- 5% collar for foreign exchange fluctuation (the “Bonus Adjusted EBITDA”) compared to the budgeted Adjusted EBITDA. At the end of the fiscal year, the budgeted Adjusted EBITDA may be adjusted, upward or downward, to eliminate any variance between the actual North American industry box office for the fiscal year and the industry forecast used to set the cash bonus target in the first quarter.

The cash bonus payout structure and the Bonus Adjusted EBITDA hurdles, as adjusted, for 2018 were as follows:

LOGO

How do we measure performance and determine cash bonus payouts for the year?

Prior to making any payouts, the Compensation Committee assesses and certifies the Company’s performance for the bonus year in the first quarter of the payout year which follows the bonus year. In its assessment, in addition to the adjustments discussed above, the Compensation Committee may make further adjustments as permitted by the bonus program under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Such adjustments include, but are not limited to, factors such as extraordinary, unusual ornon-recurring events that were not included in the operating budget for the year being considered (such as the disposition of a theatre or theatres or the cessation of operation of a theatre as a result of a natural disaster). The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, at any time, establish (and, once established, rescind, waive or amend) additional conditions and terms of payment of the cash bonus (including, but not limited to, the achievement of other financial, strategic or individual goals, which may be objective or subjective) as it may deem desirable in carrying out the purposes of the cash bonus program. The Compensation Committee may also take into account such other factors as it deems appropriate in administering any aspect of the cash bonus program, including reducing the amount of the cash bonus at any time prior to payout based on such criteria as it shall determine, including, but not limited to, individual merit and the attainment of specified levels of one or any combination of the performance factors. However, the Compensation Committee cannot waive, accelerate or amend the performance goals for a NEO except in the event of the death or disability of the executive or a sale of the Company.

Beginning 2018, the Compensation Committee added the ABO modifier to an individual payout. See discussion below on 2018 changes to the cash bonus program for the details.

How was cash bonus calibrated in 2018 and why?

In 2018, the Compensation Committee calibrated the cash bonus program to enhance alignment of payout with performance. The adjustments were as follows:

a.

Increased the Budgeted Adjusted EBITDA target for maximum payout for allnon-CEO NEOs to 110% from 108%. Mr. Zoradi’s payout has been at 110% of target since 2017. By raising the bar for performance, the Compensation Committee ensured continued focus by the top executives on driving industry-leading results.

b.

Tied a portion of the cash bonus payout to the ABO ratings of the individual for the year. The ABO modifier rates the individual’s performance against the Company’s strategic objectives and goals for the year. The ABO modifier is applicable to all bonus-eligible employees, including the NEOs. Based on the ABO modifier, the individual’s cash bonus payout is adjusted up to a maximum of (+/-)15 percentage points. However, maximum bonus payout (Adjusted EBITDA-based + ABO modifier) cannot exceed 165% of the individual’s target bonus opportunity. The ABO modifier provides for higher compensation for those who have contributed more to the business during the year and thus aligns individual and Company performance.

c.

Raised the target bonus percentages for Messrs. Gamble and Cavalier to 90% from 85% of their respective base salary given their evolving roles in the Company and to better align with industry peers.

What was the cash bonus payout for the NEOs for 2018?

In February 2019, the Compensation Committee certified the worldwide Bonus Adjusted EBITDA for 2018 at $754.2 million which is 101.3% of the target Bonus Adjusted EBITDA of $744.8 million. This yielded a payout for Messrs. Mitchell, Zoradi, Gamble and Cavalier at 106.3% of their individual target opportunity and for Mr. Fernandes at 80% of his target opportunity. Similar to prior years, Mr. Fernandes’s cash bonus was split 50%/50% between worldwide and Latin America Adjusted EBITDA. Latin America performance resulted in a payout just above the threshold at 50%. The individual cash bonus payouts for 2018 were calculated for each of the NEOs as follows:

What was the cash bonus payout for the NEOs for 2018?

Name 2018 Base Salary  

Individual Target

(Percentage of
Base Salary)

  Payout
Percentage
of Individual
Target
  

ABO

Modifier

      Cash Bonus    
Payout
 

Lee Roy Mitchell

 $975,000   100  106.3  -  $    1,036,425 

Mark Zoradi

 $    1,000,000   100  106.3  -  $1,063,000 

Sean Gamble

 $600,000   90  106.3  7.5 $617,072 

Michael Cavalier

 $525,000   90  106.3  7.5 $539,938 

Valmir Fernandes

 $525,000   85  80  -  $357,000 

Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation

The Compensation Committee annually awards time-based and performance-based equity incentive compensation to certain eligible employees, including the NEOs. The combination of the two, with an emphasis placed on performance-based equity, ensures both balance and alignment within our long-term incentive program. Equity compensation encourages Company’s long-term growth and aligns the executive’s interests with the interests of our stockholders. Grants to all eligible employees, including the NEOs, are made within the first 90 days of the year.

How is the long-term incentive program structured?

The target value of long-term equity incentive awards is based on a percentage of the executive’s base salary. The target value and the percentage split between time-based and performance-based awards is determined by the Compensation Committee by taking into consideration various factors such as individual’s leadership and role in Company operations, projected state of the economy over the performance period and overall business environment.

Restricted Stock. All participants to our equity incentive plan are eligible to receive restricted stock. Time-based restricted stock enables us to attract and retain highly qualified individuals while tying their pay with continued growth of the Company over the long-term. Restricted stock grants typically vest 50% on each of the second and fourth anniversaries of the grant date subject to continuous employment through the vest dates.

Recipients of restricted stock awards are permitted to:

(i)

receive dividends on the restricted stock to the extent dividends are paid by the Company on shares of its Common Stock, and

(ii)

to vote such Common Stock during the restriction period.

As of the Record Date, the Company’s dividend rate is $0.34 per common share per quarter.

Performance Awards. Performance awards are granted in the form of restricted stock units. The goals for the performance shares are based on one or morepre-established objective criteria. At the time of grant, the performance-based awards are hypothetical shares of Common Stock subject to issuance only upon attainment of the performance goals.

The performance goal is based on an implied equity value concept that measures the change in an IRR during a performance period of two years beginning on January 1 of the grant year and ending on December 31 of the following year. The performance goal is set within the first 90 days of the grant year.

The implied equity value is based on a valuation model utilizing a multiple of Adjusted EBITDA (subject to certain specified adjustments) and other factors that produce a fundamental valuation of Cinemark equity. IRR represents the growth in this implied equity value during the performance period. The structure of the performance award program is similar to that of cash bonus. Each performance target underlying the performance awards has a threshold, target and maximum level and vest on a pro rata basis according to the IRR achieved during the performance period, with the maximum level equal to 150% of the individual’s target. The target IRR goal for the performance-based award is set by the Compensation Committee based on projected value creation with a substantial degree of difficulty to attain the performance level. The IRR for the performance period is calculated applying a 7.5% cap for fluctuation in foreign currency translation adjustments.

If, at the end of the performance period, the Compensation Committee certifies that the performance target has been met, the shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units are subject to an additional time-based vesting restriction contingent upon the employee’s continued service until the vest date.

Any dividends that are attributable to the underlying Common Stock will be accrued and paid to the recipient, to the extent the performance award vests, at the end of the four years when the Common Stock is issued.

How was long-term equity incentive compensation calibrated in 2018 and why?

The Compensation Committee annually reviews each NEO’s compensation to determine the percentage of base salary to be awarded as long-term equity awards and the appropriate mix of time-based and performance-based awards. Upon such review, in 2018, the Compensation Committee made the following changes:

a.

Increased the long-term equity incentive compensation target value for Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble and Cavalier. The percentage of base salary for purposes of determining the target value of the long-term equity incentive awards for 2018 for each NEO was as follows:

NEO

Percentage of  

Base Salary


   Lee Roy Mitchell

N/A

   Mark Zoradi

250%

   Sean Gamble

175%

   Michael Cavalier

150%

   Valmir Fernandes

125%

b.

Shifted the split of performance-based and time-based equity awards, at target, for all non-CEO NEOs to 60% performance-based and 40% time-based from the 50%/50% split in prior years. Mr. Zoradi’s split has been 75% performance-based and 25% time-based since 2017.

The number of time-based and performance-based (at target) shares of Common Stock granted to each of the NEOs in 2018 were as follows:

Name 

Time-based

Restricted Stock

  

Performance-based

Restricted Stock Units

 

Lee Roy Mitchell

  N/A   N/A 

Mark Zoradi

  16,013   48,039 

Sean Gamble

  10,760   16,141 

Michael Cavalier

  8,070   12,106 

Valmir Fernandes

  6,725   10,088 

c.

The IRR goals for the 2018 performance-based awards remained unchanged from 2017 and are as follows with straight-line interpolation used to determine payout between threshold, target and maximum goals:

 

Performance Metric
and Payout

 

 

 

Goals                             

    
  

    Threshold

 

 

  Target

 

 

  Maximum

 

  IRR

 

 

7.0%        

 

 

9.5%        

 

 

13.0%  

 

  Percentage of Individual

  Target Payout

 

 

50%        

 

 

100%        

 

 

150%  

 

The performance period for the 2018 grants is from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Once the Compensation Committee certifies the IRR achieved for the performance period, the award recipient must satisfy an additionaltwo-year service period until the anniversary of the grant date in February 2022.

In line with our compensation philosophy of rewarding performance, the Compensation Committee awarded a special grant of restricted stock to all employees, including the NEOs, who received performance-based awards in 2016. This was in recognition of the Company’s significant and sustained outperformance on key performance metrics relative to its peers since 2016. The Compensation Committee determined that the special grant appropriately rewarded the employees based upon the three tenets of the Company’s compensation philosophy. The time-based restricted shares granted under the special grant vest fully on the second anniversary of the grant date and were of the following amounts:

Name

Special Grant  

   Lee Roy Mitchell

N/A

   Mark Zoradi

14,081

   Sean Gamble

3,489

   Michael Cavalier

3,346

   Valmir Fernandes

3,574

Tenet 3: Balance

Compensation Mix

The presentations below show the mix of the variable and fixed components of compensation as a percentage of target total compensation. The ‘Total Equity Target’ category does not include the restricted stock awarded under the special grant since it was awarded in addition to the regular compensation. Mr. Zoradi is presented individually while Messrs. Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes are presented as a group. Since Mr. Mitchell does not receive any equity grant on an annual basis due to his substantial ownership in the Company, he has not been included in thenon-CEO NEO group. His compensation is 49% each of base salary and target cash bonus and 1% benefits.

    Variable                       Fixed              

   CEO

   76%                   24% 

   Non-CEO NEO group

   67%   33% 

LOGO

THE PROCESS OF SETTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Role of the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Consultant: The Compensation Committee oversees and provides strategic direction to management regarding all aspects of our pay program for senior executives. It sets the compensation of the CEO and thenon-CEO NEOs. If deemed appropriate, the Compensation Committee advises the Board of its determination of the compensation of the CEO and certain other executive officers, prior to its implementation. But, while the Compensation Committee may consider input provided by the Board, the compensation decisions and determinations are made solely by the Compensation Committee.

Each year the Compensation Committee engages in extensive executive compensation discussions with our independent compensation consultant to review best practices and receive a competitive assessment of executive compensation compared to peers. The Committee reviews total compensation and approves each of the elements of executive compensation, and reviews whether compensation programs and practices carry undue risk. During 2018, the Compensation Committee continued to engage Pearl Meyer as its independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee determined the independence of Pearl Meyer using the NYSE listing standards regarding independence of compensation consultants. Pearl Meyer evaluates the competitiveness of the design of the Company’s executive compensation program, including that for directors and recommends appropriate changes; reviews the competitiveness of the compensation of individual NEOs and certain other executive officers; evaluates market pay data and competitive-positioning; provides analyses and inputs on program structure, performance measures, and goals; provides updates on market trends and the regulatory environment as it relates to executive compensation; reviews various management proposals presented to the Compensation Committee related to executive compensation and provides objective analysis and recommendations; and works with the Compensation Committee to validate and strengthen thepay-for-performance relationship and alignment with stockholder interests. Pearl Meyer does not perform other services for Cinemark, and will not do so without the prior consent of the Compensation Committee. Pearl Meyer meets with the Compensation Committee, outside the presence of management, in executive sessions.

Role of Management and the CEO in Setting Executive Compensation: The Compensation Committee solicits the views of our CEO when making compensation decisions for his direct reports. The CEO may also

provide input to the Compensation Committee regarding performance metrics and the setting of appropriate performance targets for executives who report directly to him. The CEO, however, does not make recommendations to the Compensation Committee about his own compensation and none of our executive officers are involved in the Compensation Committee’s determination of their own compensation.

Use of Peer Review in Setting Our Executive Compensation: The Compensation Committee believes the management team’s compensation should be aligned to similarly situated executives within a peer group of companies in order to attract, retain and motivate the highest caliber executive management team critical to our long-term success. While we do not rely solely on benchmark compensation to establish target pay levels, Pearl Meyer conducts a review, annually, of the compensation programs of peers selected based onsize-appropriate comparators operating in entertainment and retail industries (the “peer group”) that are also traded publicly. We believe the resulting peer group provides the Compensation Committee with a valid comparison for the Company’s executive compensation program. A blended market data using the most recent proxy data andsize-appropriate survey information provided by Pearl Meyer was used by the Compensation Committee to determine 2018 compensation for each of the NEOs.

Our Peer Group for 2018 was as follows:

AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.

Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.

Discovery, Inc.

AMC Networks Inc.

Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.

IMAX Corporation

Brinker International, Inc.

The Madison Square Garden Company

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

Cineplex, Inc.

Regal Entertainment Group

Dave & Buster’s Entertainment, Inc.

E.W. Scripps Company

Compensation Risk Assessment

Our compensation program provides strategic direction to the participant and engages them in the Company’s success, which contributes to stockholder value. We believe our approach to goal setting, establishing targets with payouts at multiple levels of performance, evaluation of performance results and negative discretion in the payout of incentives help to mitigate excessive risk-taking that could harm Company value or reward poor judgment by our executives. Below are some additional highlights of the Company’s compensation program which mitigate risks associated with compensation:

Appropriate mix of “short- vs. long-term” pay and “fixed vs. variable” pay” to reward overall performance;

Measuring Company performance against objective financial metrics;

Capped payout levels for incentive compensation;

Stock ownership guidelines for directors, NEOs and executive vice-presidents – directors required to retain Common Stock ownership five times the value of their cash retainer, the CEO five times his/her base salary and other executive officers two time their respective base salary;

Linking vest of a significant portion of long-term equity incentive awards to performance over a significant period of time (with overlapping performance periods);

Validatingpay-for-performance on an annual basis by stockholders; and

Prohibiting our NEOs and those employees covered by the Supplemental Insider Trading Policy to trade in short sales of Company securities, hold Company securities in a margin account and pledge or hedge Company securities.

Our Compensation Committee monitors and considers the risk mitigating factors when setting executive compensation. Based on such review, the Compensation Committee has concluded that the compensation program does not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a materially adverse effect on the Company or put the Companyat-risk.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A as required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K with management and, based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s 2018 Form10-K, and the Board has approved the recommendation.

Respectfully submitted,

Nina Vaca (Chair)

Name

 

  

Audit

 

  

Compensation 

 

  

Governance

 

  

  Strategic Planning    

Darcy Antonellis

  Member        Member

Benjamin Chereskin

MemberChair

Nancy Loewe

ChairMember

Lee Roy Mitchell

----

Steven Rosenberg

MemberChair

Enrique Senior

Member

Carlos Sepulveda

MemberMemberMember

Raymond Syufy

Member

Nina Vaca

ChairMember

Mark Zoradi

----

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation PlansNumber of Committee Meetings Held

During 2020

4613
Number of Decisions by Consent During 20201200

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Effective February 11, 2021, the Governance Committee recommended, and the Board approved Nancy Loewe as the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Both Mr. Sepulveda, the past Chair, and Ms. Loewe qualify as “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning of Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. See Ms. Loewe and Mr. Sepulveda’s biographies on page 18 and page 14 respectively, for further information regarding their qualifications to be an “audit committee financial expert”. Each of the Audit Committee members satisfies the standards for independence of the NYSE and the SEC as they relate to audit committees.

The Audit Committee is governed by the Audit Committee Charter which sets forth the purpose and responsibilities of this committee.

Functions:

The functions of the Audit Committee include the following:

assisting the Board in its oversight responsibilities regarding (1) the integrity of our financial statements, (2) our risk management compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) our systems of internal control and (4) our accounting, auditing and financial reporting processes generally, including the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent registered public accountants;

approving the report required by the SEC for inclusion in our annual proxy or information statement;

appointing, retaining, compensating, evaluating and replacing our independent registered public accountants;

approving audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accountants;

establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and resolution of complaints regarding accounting, internal control or auditing matters submitted confidentially and anonymously by employees through the whistleblower hotline; and

performing such other functions as the Board may from time to time assign to the Audit Committee.

 

    

Plan Category

   


 

Number of

Securities to be

Issued upon

Exercise of

Outstanding

Options,
Warrants

and Rights(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

  




 

Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price of

Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and

Rights

 



 

 



 

 

 

   





 

Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under

Equity Compensation
Plans

(Excluding Securities
Reflected in the First
Column)

 



 


 



 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

   

 

594,266

 

 

 

  

 

N/A

 

 

 

   

 

7,700,363

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

   -   -    - 

Total

 

   

 

594,266

 

 

 

  

 

N/A

 

 

 

   

 

7,700,363

 

 

 

LOGO29


The Audit Committee meets on a quarterly basis with Company management and Deloitte and Touche, to discuss, among other items, the earnings press release related to the quarter and the year (as applicable), the Company’s financial statements for the applicable period and any changes in significant accounting policies and its impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee also meets, on a periodic basis, with Deloitte and Touche in executive sessions without the presence of members of management.

As part of the Board’s duty of risk oversight, the Board has delegated authority of cybersecurity oversight to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is updated by Company management twice a year to monitor and evaluate the cybersecurity threats and the effectiveness of the Company’s controls to address those risks. The Audit Committee also oversees and monitors the enterprise level risks related to ethics and compliance with the Company’s code of business conduct. Company management provides to the Audit Committee, at every quarterly meeting, the top claims (as determined by management) reported through the ethics hotline, and summary reports for various categories of claims, for both domestic and international, with a comparison to previous years.

The Board has also delegated its authority to approve related party transactions to the Audit Committee. The Company’s written policy regarding approval of related party transactions provides that management must present to the Audit Committee all potential related party transactions including the nature of the transaction, material terms and the maximum dollar value of the transaction. The Audit Committee approves based upon the determination of whether the transaction is fair and in the best interest of the Company. See Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions on page 22 for further details on the approval of related party transactions.

Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services:

The Audit Committee approves all audit and permissible non-audit services above a de-minimis threshold (including the fees and terms of the services) performed for the Company by Deloitte and Touche prior to the time that those services are commenced. The Audit Committee may, when it deems appropriate, form and delegate this authority to a sub-committee consisting of one or more Audit Committee members, including the authority to grant pre-approvals of audit and permitted non-audit services. The decision of such sub-committee is presented to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting. The Audit Committee pre-approved all fees for 2020 noted in the table below.

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:

We paid the following fees (in thousands) to Deloitte and Touche and its affiliates for professional services rendered by them during 2020 and 2019, respectively:

Fees

 

  

2020

 

   

2019

 

 

Audit

 

  $

 

                2,158.5

 

 

 

  $

 

                2,056.9

 

 

 

Audit Related

 

  $

 

179.7

 

 

 

  $

 

154.0

 

 

 

Tax(1)

 

  $

 

86.8

 

 

 

  $

 

60.8

 

 

 

Other

 

  $

 

-

 

 

 

  $

 

-

 

 

 

Total

 

  $

 

2,425.0

 

 

 

  $

 

2,271.7

 

 

 

(1) Fees primarily include transfer pricing studies and tax compliance services.

  

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s audited financial statements for 2020. We have discussed with Deloitte and Touche the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the SEC. We have received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte and Touche as required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and have discussed with Deloitte and Touche its independence. Based on the above review and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements for the Company be included in the Company’s 2020 Form 10-K for filing with the SEC.

LOGO30


Respectfully submitted,

Nancy Loewe (Chair)

Steven Rosenberg

Darcy Antonellis

Carlos Sepulveda (Past Chair)

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Each member of the Compensation Committee satisfies the standards for independence of the NYSE as they relate to compensation committees and qualify as “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee is governed by the Compensation Committee Charter, which sets forth the purpose and responsibilities of this committee.

Functions

The functions of the Compensation Committee include the following:

making recommendations to the Board on the Company’s general compensation philosophy and objectives and on all matters of policy and procedures relating to executive compensation;

determining and approving the CEO’s compensation level;

determining and approving the compensation of the non-CEO NEOs and reviewing the compensation of certain other executive officers;

administering (to the extent such authority is delegated to the Compensation Committee by the Board) the incentive compensation and equity-based plans and recommending to the Board any modifications of such plans;

validating and approving the achievement of performance levels under the Company’s incentive compensation plans;

reviewing, recommending, and discussing with management the CD&A section included in the Company’s annual proxy statement; and

developing a succession planning program for the CEO and senior management.

GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

The Governance Committee is composed solely of directors who satisfy all criteria for independence under the rules of the NYSE. The Governance Committee is governed by the Governance Committee Charter setting forth the purpose and responsibilities of this committee.

Functions

The functions of the Governance Committee include the following:

identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and evaluate candidates for Board membership, including those recommended by stockholders in compliance with the Company’s by-laws;

recommending to the Board the director nominees for election or to fill any vacancies and newly created directorships on the Board;

identifying and recommending to the Board members qualified to fill any vacancies on a committee of the Board;

developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines and reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of such guidelines at least annually;

overseeing the Board’s annual self-evaluation process and the Board’s evaluation of management;

periodically reviewing the criteria for the selection of new directors to serve on the Board and recommending any proposed changes to the Board for approval;

LOGO31


periodically reviewing and making recommendations regarding the composition and size of the Board;

periodically reviewing and making recommendations regarding the composition, size, purpose, structure, operations and charter of each of the Board’s committees, including the creation of additional committees or elimination of existing committees;

annually recommending to the Board the chairpersons and members of each of the Board’s committees; and

reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of the Governance Committee Charter on an annual basis and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Our director compensation program is designed to attract and to fairly compensate highly qualified, non-employee directors to represent our stockholders on the Board and to act in the stockholders’ best interests. The Company believes that compensation for non-management directors should be competitive and should encourage increased ownership of the Company’s Common Stock through the payment of a portion of director compensation in Company equity. In accordance with the Compensation Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee sets the compensation of our Board members. Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant annually reviews and reports to the Compensation Committee as to how the Company’s director compensation practices compare with those of other similarly situated companies.The Board makes changes in its director compensation practices only upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, and following discussion and unanimous concurrence by the full Board.

The compensation of our non-employee directors is subject to our Third Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy (Director Compensation Policy). Under the Director Compensation Policy, a non-employee director is one who is not (i) an employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries, or (ii) an employee of any of the Company’s stockholders which has contractual rights to nominate directors. Therefore, as Company employees, Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi do not receive any compensation for their services on the Board or any of its committees.

The compensation of the directors per the Director Compensation Policy is as follows:

(a)

a base director retainer of $60,000;

(b)

additional retainer of $35,000 for the non-employee director who serves as the lead independent director;

(c)

additional cash retainer for services on the committees as follows:

Committee                         Chairperson                          Member 

Audit

    $            20,000     $            10,000 

Compensation

    $15,000     $10,000 

Governance

    $10,000     $7,500 

Strategic Long-Range Planning

    $10,000     $5,000 

Annual cash retainers are paid in four equal quarterly installments at the end of each quarter for services rendered during the quarter. All directors are reimbursed for travel related expenses incurred for each Board meeting they attend.

In addition to the annual cash retainers, the non-employee directors receive an annual grant of restricted stock valued at $115,000. The number of shares of restricted stock is determined by dividing $115,000 by the closing price of Common Stock on the grant date, rounded down to the nearest whole share. The grant date is typically on or around June 15. The annual awards vest on the first anniversary of the grant date subject to continued service to the Company through the vest date. The directors are also subject to a stock ownership guideline and are required to retain Common Stock ownership five times the value of their base retainer. Our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) imposes a $1,000,000 limit on the compensation that can be awarded to a non-employee director in any given fiscal year, including the sum of (i) cash compensation and (ii) the grant date fair value of equity compensation under the 2017 Plan.

LOGO32


As discussed earlier in this proxy statement, during 2020, management implemented Company-wide pay reductions for approximately five months, from April through August. During this period, the Board members opted to forego their cash retainers for the second quarter. Full payment of the cash retainers was reinstated beginning the third quarter, at the same time that the full salaries for the employees was reinstated. The following table sets forth summary information regarding the compensation of our non-employee directors for 2020. See the compensation tables beginning on page 54 for the compensation paid to Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi.

Name  Fees Projected
to Be Paid in
2020
   

Fees Actually
Earned or

Paid in Cash

   Stock Awards(1)  All Other
Compensation(2)
  Total
Compensation
Actually Received
 

Darcy Antonellis

  $70,000   $35,000   $114,990  $            1,085  $151,075 

Benjamin Chereskin

  $80,000   $40,000   $114,990  $1,085  $                156,075 

Nancy Loewe

  $77,500   $38,750   $114,990  $1,085  $154,825 

Steven Rosenberg

  $80,000   $40,000   $114,990  $1,085  $156,075 

Enrique Senior

  $70,000   $35,000   $114,990  $1,085  $151,075 

Carlos Sepulveda

  $            130,000   $            65,000   $            114,990  $1,085  $181,075 

Raymond Syufy

  $70,000   $35,000   $114,990  $1,085  $151,075 

Nina Vaca

  $82,500   $41,250   $114,990  $1,085  $157,325 

 

 (1)

Represents unearned shares underlying restricted stock units, assuming the achievement of maximum performance goals.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 2018

The following table sets forth summary information concerning the total compensation earned by our NEOs for each of the last three completed fiscal years.

Name and

Principal Position

   Year    Salary
($)(1)
   

Stock

Awards

($)(2)

   

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation ($)(3)

   

All Other

Compensation

($)(4)

   Total ($) 

Lee Roy Mitchell

Chairman of the Board

 2018   975,000    -    1,036,426    23,900    2,035,326 
 2017   958,645    -    1,426,464    21,586    2,406,695 
 2016

 

   

 

930,723

 

 

 

   

 

-

 

 

 

   

 

1,396,085

 

 

 

   

 

21,122

 

 

 

   

 

2,347,930

 

 

 

Mark Zoradi

Chief Executive Officer

 2018   1,000,000    3,049,518    1,063,000    132,738    5,245,256 
 2017   950,000    2,114,475    1,320,500    104,845    4,489,820 
 2016

 

   

 

816,000

 

 

 

   

 

2,031,947

 

 

 

   

 

1,224,000

 

 

 

   

 

88,691

 

 

 

   

 

4,160,638

 

 

 

Sean Gamble

Chief Operating Officer
& Chief Financial Officer

 2018   600,000    1,186,109    617,072    61,796    2,464,977 
 2017   525,000    779,015    664,020    47,280    2,015,315 
 2016

 

   

 

482,040

 

 

 

   

 

602,526

 

 

 

   

 

542,295

 

 

 

   

 

40,219

 

 

 

   

 

1,667,080

 

 

 

Michael Cavalier

Executive Vice President –
General Counsel & Secretary

 2018   525,000    918,064    539,938    123,311    2,106,313 
 2017   500,000    667,666    632,400    96,969    1,897,035 
 2016

 

   

 

462,264

 

 

 

   

 

577,805

 

 

 

   

 

589,387

 

 

 

   

 

99,544

 

 

 

   

 

1,729,000

 

 

 

Valmir Fernandes

President – Cinemark

International

 2018   525,000    795,705    357,000    128,448    1,806,153 
 2017   508,000    628,178    538,455    103,858    1,778,491 
 2016

 

   

 

493,782

 

 

 

   

 

617,206

 

 

 

   

 

629,572

 

 

 

   

 

107,576

 

 

 

   

 

1,848,136

 

 

 

(1) 

SeeAnalysis of the Design of the Executive Compensation Program Base Salary for a discussion of how the base salary is determined. See Compensation Mix for the percentage of target total compensation for 2018 paid as base salary.

(2)

The reported amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair values of the long-term equity incentive awards, at target as the most probable outcome, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures. See Note 15 to the Company’s 2018 Form10-K for a discussion of the assumptions used in determining the grant date fair values of these long-term equity incentive awards, including forfeiture assumptions and the period over which the Company will recognize compensation expense for such awards.

The long-term equity incentive awards granted were restricted stock and restricted stock units. The restricted stock includes the special grant discussed on page 38. Similar to previous years, Mr. Mitchell was not awarded any equity due to his substantial equity ownership in the Company.

The grant date fair values were calculated based upon the closing price of Common Stock on February 16, 2018June 15, 2020 of $39.03, February 14, 2017 of $42.37 and February 19, 2016 of $29.36$15.33 per share. This calculation is in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

See Note 17 to the Company’s 2020 Form 10-K, for discussion of the assumptions used in determining the grant date fair values of these share based awards, including forfeiture assumptions and the period over which the Company will recognize compensation expense for such awards.

At December 31, 2020, each of the directors owned 7,501 shares of restricted stock. See Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management table on page 68 for total stock ownership of each of the directors.

(2)

The amounts reported are dividends paid during the first quarter of 2020 on the shares of unvested restricted stock granted in 2019. The Company suspended quarterly dividends beginning the second quarter of 2020 due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

LOGO33


ITEM TWO — RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE AND TOUCHE, LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2021

The Audit Committee has appointed and the Board has ratified the appointment of Deloitte and Touche as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2021. As a matter of good corporate governance, we are seeking stockholder ratification of the appointment of Deloitte and Touche. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte and Touche, the Audit Committee may review its future selection of auditors. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

One or more representatives of Deloitte and Touche are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to answer appropriate questions. Please refer to page 30 for the fees paid to Deloitte and Touche in 2020 and 2019.

Unless marked to the contrary, proxies received will be voted “FOR” ratification of the appointment of Deloitte and Touche as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE

FOR

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE AND TOUCHE AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2021

ITEM THREE — NON-BINDING, ANNUAL ADVISORY VOTE ON OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company is providing stockholders with an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in the CD&A, the compensation tables, narrative discussion, and related footnotes included in this proxy statement).

While the vote is advisory, and therefore non-binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee values the opinions of our stockholders and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.

As discussed in more detail in the CD&A, our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain a talented team of executives who can deliver on our commitment to build long-term stockholder value. The Compensation Committee believes our program is competitive in the marketplace and links pay to performance.

Accordingly, the Board recommends that you vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the CD&A, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.”

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE

FOR

THE ADVISORY VOTE ON OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION FOR 2020

LOGO34


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

To assist our stockholders in locating important information regarding our executive compensation program, the CD&A is organized as follows:

SectionPage Reference    

Our NEOs

35

2020 Say-on-Pay Result

36

Executive Summary

37

Overview of 2020 Executive Compensation Set in February 2020

38

Executive Compensation Best Practices

40

Our Compensation Philosophy

40

Design of Our Executive Compensation Program

40

Executive Compensation Components

41

-     Base Salary

42

-     Cash Bonus

44

-      Long-term Incentive Compensation

49

2021 Compensation Changes

50

Executive Compensation Process: Roles

50

Executive Compensation Process: Peer Group Review

51

Compensation Risk Assessment

51

Compensation Committee Report

52

OUR NEOS

The CD&A provides a description of the material elements of our executive compensation program, as well as perspective and context for decisions made regarding the compensation of our CEO, CFO and our three other most highly compensated executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2020. These executive officers and their current positions are as follows:

Name

Age

Position

Lee Roy Mitchell

84

Executive Chairman of the Board

Mark Zoradi

67

Chief Executive Officer; Director

Sean Gamble

46

Chief Operating Officer; Chief Financial Officer

Michael Cavalier

54

Executive Vice President-General Counsel and Secretary

Valmir Fernandes

60

President-Cinemark International

Lee Roy Mitchell is the founder of the Company. He has served as our Chairman of the Board since March 1996 and as a director since our inception in 1987. Mr. Mitchell has been engaged in the motion picture exhibition business for over 50 years. Mr. Mitchell is the brother-in-law of Walter Hebert III, the Executive Vice President–Purchasing, of the Company. Mr. Mitchell served on the board of directors of National CineMedia, Inc. from 2007 until 2021.

Mark Zoradi has served as our director since June 2015 and our CEO since August 2015. Mr. Zoradi spent 30 years at The Walt Disney Company, including serving as the President of Walt Disney Studios Motion Picture Group. Prior to that, Mr. Zoradi served in a variety of positions of increasing responsibility with The Walt Disney Company, including as the General Manager of Buena Vista Television and President of Buena Vista International with responsibility for the international theatrical and home entertainment marketing and distribution of Disney, Touchstone and Pixar films. Mr. Zoradi also served as the President and COO of Dick Cook Studios from January 2011 until July 2014 and the COO of Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. from August 2014 until January 2015. Mr. Zoradi currently serves on the board of directors of National CineMedia, Inc.

LOGO35


Sean Gamble has served as our COO and CFO since January 2018 and as our Executive Vice President and CFO since August 2014. Prior to joining Cinemark, from February 2009 until April 2014, Mr. Gamble worked for the Comcast Corporation as Executive Vice President and CFO of Universal pictures within NBCUniversal, one of the world’s leading media and entertainment companies. He joined Comcast after 15 years at the General Electric Company where he held multiple senior leadership positions, including CFO of GE Oil & Gas’ Equipment business based in Florence, Italy from May 2007 until January 2009.

Michael Cavalier has served as our Executive Vice President-General Counsel and Secretary since February 2014, our Senior Vice President-General Counsel and Secretary since January 2006 and our General Counsel since 1997. He has been with Cinemark for more than 25 years.

Valmir Fernandes has served as our President of Cinemark International, L.L.C. since March 2007 and has been with Cinemark for more than 20 years.

2020 SAY-ON-PAY RESULT

LOGO

We provide stockholders with the opportunity to cast an annual advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs. At the 2020 Annual Meeting, approximately 96% of the stockholder votes cast on say-on-pay were voted in favor of the proposal. The Compensation Committee believes that this substantial majority of votes in favor affirms stockholders’ support for our approach to executive compensation.

LOGO36


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS FOR 2020 AND CHANGES FOR 2021

February 2020: annual compensation was set

The compensation-related decisions for 2020 were made in February 2020, following Cinemark’s outstanding business and financial performance in 2019, and prior to the onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic. Given our high stockholder approval for the 2019 say-on-pay vote, the Compensation Committee did not make any material changes to the 2020 executive compensation program when it set the NEO compensation packages for 2020.

March 2020: onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on compensation

The business environment for our Company drastically changed beginning mid-March, with the start of the pandemic. This resulted in significant consequences on our employee compensation, some of which were:

o

Salary reductions for a period of approximately five months;

o

Negation of the Company’s long-term and short-term performance-metrics, which determine a considerable portion of our executive compensation;

o

Loss of dividend income due to suspension of quarterly dividends; and

o

Loss of cash value of equity awarded as long-term incentive compensation due to depressed price of our Common Stock

August 2020: Compensation Committee makes discretion-based Retention Equity Grant

The Compensation Committee awards restricted shares to all corporate employees and theatre general managers to address employee retention concerns in the context of concerns regarding the prolonged and continued impact of COVID-19 on the industry.

December 2020: Compensation Committee makes discretion-based Bonus Equity Grant; accelerates vest of equity

To compensate, motivate and reward employees for their performance through the pandemic, the Compensation Committee awards immediately vesting shares of Common Stock to all bonus-eligible employees. NEOs receive restricted shares that vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. The Compensation Committee also approves accelerated vests of all equity awards that were due to vest on or before May 2021. These accelerated vests were deemed to be in the best interest of the Company as they provided employees with an additional source of compensation at year-end which helped motivate and reward employees for their performance while conserving cash and allowing the Company to leverage certain compensation related relief provided by COVID related legislation.

2021 compensation impacted by COVID-19

In light of ongoing macroeconomic and industry conditions, in February 2021, the Compensation Committee adopts certain changes for the 2021 compensation program.

LOGO37


OVERVIEW OF 2020 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SET IN FEBRUARY 2020

Base Salaries

Long-term Incentive Award Values

No increase in base salary of the CEO; Increase in base salary of the other NEOs to reflect their and Cinemark’s consistent outperformance of the industry and its peers

Annual equity awards granted to the NEOs to motivate performance and ensure alignment with stockholder interests

Target Cash Bonus Incentive

Equity Award Structure

No change in target cash bonus opportunity for Messrs. Mitchell, Zoradi, Cavalier and Fernandes

Target cash bonus opportunity for Mr. Gamble increased to reflect his outstanding performance, increasing job responsibilities and to align with market and internal pay equity

No change in the cash bonus structure; Adjusted EBITDA target was set to reflect, as of February, the projected state of the industry during 2020

No ABO rating adjustment for Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi; opportunity of +/-15% adjustment for other NEOs

Equity awards included time-based and performance-based awards; target value of equity awards determined as a percentage of base salary; target raised for CEO and CFO to better align with market, and to incentivize performance; 75% of the target value for the CEO, and 60% of the target value for the other NEOs, was allocated to at-risk, performance-based equity

Time-based restricted stock awards vest 50% every 2 years; performance-based restricted stock unit awards are certified after a two-year performance period, vesting after an additional two-year retention period

The hurdle rates for the IRR metric used to measure performance for purposes of the performance-based awards remained the same as 2019

Time-based restricted stock awards vest 50% every 2 years; performance-based restricted stock unit awards are certified after a two-year performance period, vesting after an additional two-year retention period

A detailed discussion relating to each element of compensation and the decisions summarized above is included in Executive Compensation Components below.

LOGOLOGO

of our CEO’s target total direct compensation was in the form of equity awards and 75% of the equity awards was Company performance-based

of our CEO’s target direct compensation was “at-risk” based on our performance against measurable objectives

LOGO38


CEO

2020 Target Total Direct Compensation Mix

LOGO

All Other NEOs

2020Target Total Direct Compensation Mix

LOGO

LOGO39


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICES

The Compensation Committee monitors emerging best practices in executive compensation to incorporate them into our compensation program and enhance value for our stockholders. Through its commitment to strong governance, the Compensation Committee has implemented certain “best practices.” The chart below lists some of our compensation “best practices” and also provides the compensation practices we do not follow:

What We Do

What We Do Not Do

  Provide competitive, market-driven base salary

×   Reward imprudent risk-taking

  Utilize formula-driven, quantitative performance targets for a significant portion of total compensation

×   Provide “single trigger” provisions in our employment agreements for change in control

  Overlap performance periods and capped incentive opportunities

×   Provide excise tax gross ups for change in control payments

  Balance mix of pay components

×   Offer deferred compensation

  Align management and stockholder interests through stock ownership guidelines

×   Agree to golden parachutes

  Prohibit executives from engaging in hedging transactions or pledging Cinemark stock

×   Offer pension benefits

  Provide double trigger for change in control

×   Provide excessive perks

OUR COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

Our executive compensation program is structured to attract, motivate, reward, and retain high caliber talent who will lead the Company to increase our competitive advantage and deliver sustainable profitability. This includes building a solid foundation for long-term growth while consistently achieving near-term results. While formulating an effective pay strategy, the Compensation Committee takes a holistic view of pay and performance and ensures that there is appropriate alignment with Company performance, overall business strategy and culture. We hire high caliber individuals who can determine our strategy to execute our long-term vision while continuing to deliver our mission of making the movie-going experience memorable by engaging with our customers and providing world class facilities and services. To ensure that our key executives are incentivized appropriately to deliver our mission and vision, the Compensation Committee has designed an executive compensation program that strongly aligns with the interests of stockholders in creating sustainable long-term stockholder value by directly linking pay to Company and individual performance. Each of the measures in our performance-based plan is designed to align with, and support, our business strategy – create an extraordinary guest experience, deepen customer loyalty, and pursue growth opportunities.

DESIGN OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Our executive compensation program is designed to achieve the following key objectives:

Attract and retain top talent;

Pay-for-performance, and

Strike balance between performance and risk-taking

LOGO40


To ensure that the compensation program serves the above objectives, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration the following:

Key drivers of sustainable performance

Viewing value creation over multiple overlapping timeframes

Considering total compensation as one package rather than viewing each component independently

Balancing stockholder expectations by discouraging undue risk-taking and motivating executives to drive the right behaviors

Industry comparables

The hallmarks of our executive compensation program are as follows:

CharacteristicsDescription
Competitive Base SalaryBase salary is market competitive to retain valued employees
Balanced Mix of Pay Components Over Short and Long TermsTarget compensation mix is weighted towards long-term equity-based incentives rather than short-term cash incentives
Balanced Approach to Performance-based Awards�� Performance targets are tied to multiple financial metrics of the Company; performance periods for long-term equity incentive awards overlap and, therefore, reduce the motivation to maximize performance in any one period
Individual Performance Modifies Bonus PayoutNon-CEO NEO bonus payout can be modified up to +/-15% based on performance of individual goals set against Company strategic objectives for the year; CEO evaluated against Company performance and execution of strategic goals for the Company
Stock Ownership GuidelinesCEO required to own, directly or indirectly, Company equity five times base salary; other executive officers to own two times their base salary
Hedge or Pledge of Common Stock Prohibited; No Margin Account AllowedDirectors and executives (including NEOs) who are subject to the Supplemental Insider Trading Policy, are prohibited to trade in puts, calls or other derivative securities with respect to Company securities and short sales of Company securities. They may not hold Company securities in a margin account, and may not, without prior approval, pledge Company securities as collateral for any other loan

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMPONENTS

The design of our executive compensation program is consistent with the compensation structure used in our industry:

base salary

cash bonus

long-term equity incentive awards

standard benefits

limited perks

LOGO41


The Compensation Committee designs the executive compensation program to align pay with performance with the substantial majority of target compensation comprised of variable performance-based incentive awards. The principal components of our executive compensation program and the measurement metrics determining their amount, are provided below.

LOGO

See discussion on each of the components for additional details and the section on 2020Target Total Direct CompensationMix for the CEO and other NEOs on page 39 for the distribution of target compensation between fixed and variable components as set in February 2020.

Base Salary

Base salary provides competitive annual compensation to retain high-performing, valued employees. In determining base salary, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration the scope and nature of job responsibilities of the NEO, market competitiveness relative to executives in similar positions at comparator group companies, merit increase recommendations of the CEO based on performance reviews (except in the case of his own compensation), and other judgmental factors deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has not adopted any formula with specific weightings assigned to any of the factors above.

In February 2020, as part of the annual compensation review process, the Compensation Committee increased the base salaries of each of Messrs. Mitchell, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes. The increases were based on factors such as market comparables, role of the executive in driving the Company’s growth, and retention. The Compensation Committee did not increase Mr. Zoradi’s base salary. It determined that the stockholder interests would be better served if Mr. Zoradi’s compensation is calibrated in favor of performance-centric long-term incentive awards versus an increase of base salary.

LOGO42


Impact of COVID-19 on 2020 Base Salary:

As part of the Company’s strategy to aggressively preserve cash during the pandemic, management implemented Company-wide base salary reductions from April through August, with the NEOs volunteering for a deeper pay cut than was mandatory.

The percentages to which base salaries were decreased for the NEOs and the timeline to reinstatemtent is as follows, with a comparison to the reduced percentages that were applicable to all other domestic corporate employees:

     
Month Mr. Mitchell Mr. Zoradi All Other NEOs Other Corporate Employees
April 50% 50% 50% 65%
May-June 0% 0% 20% 50%
July-August 0% 50% 80% 80%
September 100% Salary Reinstated

The 2020 base salaries that were set in February including the variances from 2019, and the actual base salaries received by the NEOs during 2020 with the percentage loss due to the pay reductions were as follows:

Name

 

 2020 Base Salary Approved  Change from
2019
 

Actual Base Salary

Received Due to COVID-19

  Percentage Loss of Base
Salary Due to Base Salary
Reductions
Lee Roy Mitchell $                1,020,001  Up 2.0% $                589,394  42.2%
Mark Zoradi $                1,100,000  No change $                740,632  32.7%
Sean Gamble $                660,000  Up 5.6% $521,435  21.0%
Michael Cavalier $                555,012  Up 2.8% $                440,923  20.0%
Valmir Fernandes $                555,012  Up 2.8% $441,633  20.4%

By August, the impact of the mandatory salary reductions over approximately five months resulted in significant loss in compensation which loss was further compounded by potential loss of cash bonus for the year for bonus-eligible employees, reduction in the value of our Common Stock due to depressed stock price and loss of dividend income. To address continuing concerns regarding the prolonged impact of COVID-19 on the industry and the Company, management increased its focus on talent retention and the Compensation Committee deemed it prudent to use the Retention Equity Grant as an effective retention tool without impacting the Company’s cash reserves. All corporate employees, including the NEOs, and theatre general managers received Retention Equity Grants in August and vest 100% in August 2022. The values of the Retention Equity Grants were calculated using base pay multipliers corresponding to the pay grades of the employees. Mr. Mitchell did not receive any Retention Equity Grant.

See Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020 table for the number of time-based restricted stock granted to each NEO under the Retention Equity Grant.

LOGO43


Cash Bonus

Our cash bonus structure is designed to motivate and reward bonus eligible employees for the successful completion of our annual performance goals. Company performance is measured against pre-established performance metrics set for the year by the Compensation Committee. The cash bonus goals are established in writing by the Compensation Committee, with the expectation that attainment of these goals would require significant effort considering the business environment.

The participants in our cash bonus program are rewarded for achieving short-term financial and operational goals of the Company based on individual targets expressed as percentages of base salaries. For the NEOs, the target cash bonus opportunities are set by the Compensation Committee by taking into consideration a variety of factors including peer group data, CEO’s recommendation (except for his own) and the individual’s current and anticipated contributions to the strategic goals of the Company. Each participant to our cash bonus plan is entitled to receive a ratable portion of his/her target cash bonus based upon the Company’s level of achievement, within the range of threshold and maximum percentages, of the target performance metric set by the Compensation Committee. The actual amount of cash bonuses paid, if any, may result in a cash bonus that is greater or less than the stated individual target (and could be zero) depending on whether, and to what extent, the applicable Company performance metric and other conditions are satisfied.

What is the Company’s annual performance metric?

The Compensation Committee sets the Company’s cash bonus target for the year in terms of Adjusted EBITDA, regarded as a key performance and valuation metric in our industry. The Adjusted EBITDA target is set for domestic, international and worldwide, in the annual operating budget approved by the Board and may be adjusted, upward or downward, at the end of the year, to eliminate any variance between the actual North American industry box office for the fiscal year and the industry forecast used to set the Adjusted EBITDA target for the year.

To determine annual cash bonus payouts if any, the Compensation Committee adjusts the Adjusted EBITDA for certain agreed upon add-backs and adjustments such as cash bonus accruals, certain severance payments, if any, unusual expenses such as those related to accounting changes, a +/- 5% collar for foreign exchange fluctuation, and other adjustments the Compensation Committee deems appropriate including, but not limited to, factors such as extraordinary, unusual or non-recurring events that were not included in the operating budget for the year (Bonus Adjusted EBITDA).

The Bonus Adjusted EBITDA is compared to the target Adjusted EBITDA set at the beginning of the year (and as adjusted at the end of the year) to determine the cash bonus payout percentage, if any.

LOGO44


The cash bonus payout for the NEOs, except for Mr. Fernandes, is based on the worldwide Adjusted EBITDA while that of all other domestic bonus eligible employees is based 100% on domestic EBITDA. Mr. Fernandes’s cash bonus payout is based 50% on worldwide and 50% on international Adjusted EBITDA. The worldwide Adjusted EBITDA targets for 2020 were as follows:

LOGO

*The maximum goal for NEOs is 110% of target performance. The Adjusted EBITDA target for international was $104 million.

How is cash bonus adjusted for individual performance?

Individual cash bonus payouts, except for Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi, may be adjusted to a maximum of +/-15% based on the individual’s Annual Business Objective (ABO) rating. The ABO rating indicates the achievement level for the goals the individual sets at the beginning of the year. These individual goals are defined through personal business objectives and are set to achieve the Company’s strategic objectives for the year.

As part of the year-end performance review process, the individual’s manager evaluates the individual’s performance against his/her ABO goals and assigns a composite score. The ratings range from ‘Significantly Below Expectations’ to ‘Exceeds Expectations’. Based on the composite rating, a discretion-based modifier of a maximum of +/-15% is applied to adjust the individual’s bonus payout calculation. We do not have a minimum level of guaranteed bonus, and maximum bonus payout (Adjusted EBITDA based + ABO modifier) cannot exceed 165% of the individual’s target bonus opportunity.

How is cash bonus adjusted for the CEO?

There is no ABO adjustment for the CEO’s cash bonus. The Compensation Committee evaluates the CEO’s performance against the Company’s goals and objectives, and the overall strategic plan, set for the year by the Board.

The annual cash bonus process is as follows:

LOGO

LOGO45


The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, at any time, establish (and, once established, rescind, waive or amend) additional conditions and terms of payment of the cash bonus (including, but not limited to, the achievement of other financial, strategic or individual goals, which may be objective or subjective) as it may deem appropriate in carrying out the purposes of the cash bonus program. The Compensation Committee may also take into account such other factors as it deems appropriate in administering any aspect of the bonus program, including reducing the amount of the bonus at any time prior to payout based on such criteria as it shall determine, including, but not limited to, individual merit and the attainment of specified levels of one or any combination of the performance factors. However, the Compensation Committee cannot adjust upwards the cash bonus payable to a NEO or waive the achievement of a performance target requirement for a NEO except in the case of the death or disability of the executive or a change in control of the Company.

Impact of COVID-19 on 2020 Cash Bonus:

The Company’s performance metrics set by the Compensation Committee in February 2020 were negated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the measurable Adjusted EBITDA metric for cash bonus payout for the year was not satisfied, the Compensation Committee did not approve any cash bonus payouts for 2020.

The cash bonus weightings, individual targets (as a percentage of base salary) for 2019 and 2020, expected target cash bonus for the year as set in February 2020, and the actual cash bonus earned for 2020, by for each of the NEOs were as follows:

        Name  Target Cash Bonus
(Percentage of Base Salary)
  

Expected Target Cash
Bonus for 2020

 

   

Actual Cash Bonus
Received

 

 
  2020  2019 

Lee Roy Mitchell

   100  100 $1,020,001   $0 

Mark Zoradi

   125  125 $1,375,000   $0 

Sean Gamble

   100  90 $660,000   $0 

Michael Cavalier

   90  90 $499,511   $0 

Valmir Fernandes

   90  90 $                499,511   $                                     0 

While the measurable performance metric in terms of Adjusted EBITDA was unreachable due to extenuating business conditions beyond management’s control, the Compensation Committee acknowledged the incredible commitment, dedication and innovation demonstrated by the employees under the strategic leadership of the executive management team which enabled Cinemark to manage through the pandemic and strengthen its leadership position in the industry. As such, in line with our compensation philosophy of pay-for-performance and for purposes of motivation and retention for continued value creation, in December 2020 the Compensation Committee made discretion-based awards of Common Stock under the Bonus Equity Grant, to all bonus-eligible employees. The Bonus Equity Grant appropriately served the long-term interests of the stockholders while preserving the Company’s liquidity in a time of unpredictable business conditions. Under the Bonus Equity Grant program, all bonus-eligible employees received immediately vested shares of Common Stock, the value of which was based, depending on the employee’s performance, within a range of 75% to 90% of the individual’s target cash bonus. The shares awarded under the Bonus Equity Grant vested immediately for all grantees, except for the NEOs for whom the award was time-based restricted stock grants with a vest period of one year from the date of grant. The NEOs (including Mr. Mitchell) received a stock grant with a fair market value of 75% of each of their respective target cash bonus opportunity.

See Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020 table for the number of time-based restricted stock granted to each NEO under the Bonus Equity Grant.

Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation

Cinemark’s long-term equity incentive compensation program is intended to help (1) attract, motivate, and retain key talent, and (2) align our executives’ interests with stockholders’ interests to maximize long-term stockholder value.

The long-term equity incentive compensation is awarded as time-based and performance-based equity. Time-based equity enables us to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers as leaders to ensure our continued success. Performance-based equity encourages Company’s long-term growth and aligns the executive’s interests with the

LOGO46


interests of our stockholders. The combination of the two, with an emphasis placed on performance-based equity, ensures both balance and alignment within our long-term incentive program. Although no longer necessary under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, grants to all eligible employees, including the NEOs, are made in the first quarter of the year. The NEOs receive both time-based and performance-based equity.

How is the long-term incentive program structured?

The target value of long-term equity awards granted to a NEO is based on a percentage of the executive’s base salary. The target value and the split between time-based and performance-based grants is determined by the Compensation Committee by taking into account factors such as the individual’s leadership, NEO’s contribution to Company operations, projected state of the economy over the performance period, overall business environment and relative positioning versus peer group comparable.

The restricted stock grants typically vest 50% on each of the second and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continuous employment through the vest dates.

Recipients of restricted stock awards are permitted to:

(i)

receive dividends on the restricted stock (prior to vest) to the extent dividends are paid by the Company on shares of its Common Stock, and

(ii)

to vote such Common Stock during the restriction period.

Beginning May 2020, the Company has suspended its dividend payments to preserve its cash reserve as it navigates through the pandemic. The quarterly dividend rate as of the first quarter of 2020 was $0.36 per share.

Performance awards are granted in the form of restricted stock units. The goals for the performance awards are based on one or more pre-established objective criteria that specify the number of shares of Common Stock that will be issued upon attaining the performance goals. After certification of the attainment of the performance goal, the underlying Common Stock is subject to additional time-based vesting conditions. Any dividends that are attributable to the underlying Common Stock will be accrued and paid to the recipient, to the extent the performance award vests, at the end of the four years when the Common Stock is issued. The performance awards have a four-year vest schedule – performance period of two years followed by an additional two-year service requirement.

The measurement metric for the performance awards is an implied equity value concept that measures the IRR over a two-year performance period beginning on January 1 of the grant year and ending on December 31 of the following year. The implied equity value is based on a valuation model utilizing a multiple of Adjusted EBITDA (subject to certain specified adjustments) and other factors that produce a fundamental valuation of Cinemark equity. IRR represents the growth in this implied equity value during the performance period. The structure of the performance award program is similar to that of the bonus program. Each performance target underlying the performance awards has a threshold, target and maximum level and vest on a pro rata basis according to the IRR achieved during the performance period. The target IRR goal for the performance-based award is set by the Compensation Committee based on projected value creation with a substantial degree of difficulty of attaining the performance level. An adjustment of +/-7.5% for fluctuations in foreign currency translations is applied to certain inputs used in the calculation of the implied equity value to determine the IRR for the performance period. The targets for the grant year are established by the Compensation Committee in the first quarter of the year. The number of shares of Common Stock an executive may receive upon the attainment of a performance goal cannot be determined at the date of grant because the payment of such compensation is contingent upon attainment of the IRR. If, at the end of the performance period, the Compensation Committee certifies that the performance target has been met, the shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units are subject to an additional time-based vesting restriction contingent upon the employee’s continued service until the vest date. Straight-line interpolation is used to determine payout between threshold, target, and maximum goals.

LOGO47


The hurdle rates for the 2020 performance-based awards were unchanged from 2019 and were as follows:

Grant Year Goals
  Threshold Target Maximum

  2020

 6.0% 8.0% 14.0%

  Percentage of Individual Target Payout

 25% 100% 175%

The Compensation Committee annually reviews each NEO’s compensation to determine the percentage of base salary to be awarded as target long-term equity awards and the appropriate mix of time-based and performance-based awards. This calibration is primarily for the purpose of driving performance and delivering results over the long-term. The target percentages are set to align with the market based on the executive’s role in setting the Company’s strategic plan and driving its execution, and incentivizing performance for an appropriate alignment with stockholder objective of long-term returns. Upon such review, in February 2020, the Compensation Committee made the following changes to Mr. Zoradi and Mr. Gamble’s equity compensation based on market comparables and their roles as the principal architects and drivers of the Company’s strategic growth:

a.

Raised the target percentage of Mr. Zoradi’s long-term incentive compensation from 275% to 400% of his 2020 base salary; and

b.

Raised the target percentage of Mr. Gamble’s long-term incentive compensation from 175% to 180% of his 2020 base salary;

The split between time-based and performance-based long-term incentive awards remained at 25%-75% for Mr. Zoradi and 40%-60% for Messrs. Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes. Mr. Mitchell does not receive any annual equity incentive grant due to his substantial ownership in the Company.

The target percentages of the long-term incentive awards for 2020 as compared to 2019 were as follows for each of the NEOs:

                         Name  Target Percentage in 2020  Target Percentage in 2019

  Lee Roy Mitchell

  N/A  N/A

  Mark Zoradi

  400%  275%

  Sean Gamble

  180%  175%

  Michael Cavalier

  150%  150%

  Valmir Fernandes

  125%  125%

See Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020 table for the number of time-based restricted stock and the performance-based restricted stock units granted to each NEO in February 2020.

The restricted stock units will were subject to a two-year performance period, from January 1, 2020 until December 31, 2021 with an additional two-year retention period and vesting, to the extent certified, in February 2024. See the following discussion on Impact of COVID-19 on Long-term Incentive Compensation regarding certification of the performance-based awards granted in 2020.

LOGO48


Impact of COVID-19 on Long-term Incentive Compensation:

During year-end review of compensation, the Compensation Committee evaluated the option of accelerating the vest of long-term incentive awards that were due to vest in February 2021. These accelerated vests were deemed to be in the best interest of the Company as they provided employees with an additional source of compensation at year-end which helped motivate and reward employees for their performance while conserving cash and allowing the Company to leverage certain compensation related relief provided by COVID related legislation. Therefore, the Compensation Committee approved the accelerated vests of the following grants:

A.

All time-based restricted shares that were due to vest in February 2021, were accelerated to vest in December 2020. This decision impacted all employees, included those who received the E20 Grants. For the NEOs, these restricted shares were (i) the remaining 50% of the restricted shares granted in February 2017 and (ii) 50% of the of the restricted shares granted in February 2019.

B.

Performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2017 (2017 RSU) to all NEOs and certain other key employees, were also accelerated to vest in December 2020. The 2017 RSUs were certified by the Compensation Committee in February 2019 to vest at 96% of target and were due to vest in February 2021 after the satisfaction of the additional two-year retention period.

See Stock Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2020 table on page 60 for number of shares of Common Stock realized upon vesting of all long-term incentive compensation during 2020. See Beneficial Ownership Table on page 68 for the total ownership numbers as of December 31, 2020.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impact on our performance metrics both for the short-term annual cash bonus as well as for the long-term performance-based incentive awards. One of the hallmarks of our equity compensation program is the overlapping of performance periods, which in other years ensures continuous performance over the long-term, as opposed to performance over discrete periods of time. However, the pandemic during 2020 had unforeseen negative consequences for the long-term performance awards. Not only was performance for the year impacted, but due to the overlap, the performance periods of two grant cycles are affected – that of the 2019 and the 2020 performance-based awards. The performance periods for the 2019 and 2020 awards were January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020 and January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021, respectively.

In February 2021, the Compensation Committee evaluated the impact of the pandemic on the IRR metric used to certify the number of shares issuable under the 2019 and 2020 performance-based awards. Upon evaluation, the Compensation Committee determined that the pandemic’s effect on the Company and the movie exhibition industry, and the projected continuation of the macro-economic conditions through 2021 and beyond, had a significant impact on the ability to effectively calculate the IRR metric for both the 2019 and the 2020 awards in a meaningful way. The Compensation Committee ultimately concluded that due to the continued uncertainty regarding the timing of the industry recovery (timeline for theater openings, public sentiment regarding in-theater viewing and the constant shifting of studio release dates due to the status of the pandemic and ensuing governmental restrictions and theatre closures) and how enormously different the business environment was for 2020 and is for 2021 versus each performance period’s baseline years (2018 and 2019), any adjustment to the metric would have resulted in an irrational vesting outcome. Such an adverse consequence is due to completely unforeseen, external circumstances beyond the control of management and would not be in parity with the exceptional performance of the executive management team during the pandemic given that the 2019 and the 2020 grant, under all scenarios, will result in a zero payout. Therefore, the Compensation Committee made the discretion based decision to certify the performance-based awards granted in February 2019 and February 2020 at the target level based on Company performance and leadership under very challenging business conditions. As a balance to Committee’s decision to payout at target, per the standard feature, these performance-based restricted stock units will fully vest in February 2023 and February 2024, respectively after satisfying the applicable service period requirements.

LOGO49


2021 COMPENSATION CHANGES

In February 2021, the Compensation Committee set the compensation of the NEOs for 2021. It addressed the expected continuing impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s performance by making certain adjustments to the 2021 compensation program while aligning with our compensation objectives. The highlights of the 2021 NEO compensation are as follows:

Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi have opted to forego an annual increase of base salary

Annual merit increase for all employees, including Messrs. Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes, are in the form of time-based restricted stock grants with a one-year vest

The grants of performance-based shares have been suspended for 2021 and replaced with time-based restricted stock grants that vest 100% upon the fourth anniversary of the grant date. For all NEOs, 50% of their respective 2021 long-term equity incentive grant will consist of these 4-year cliff-vested shares. The remaining portion of the 2021 annual grant will be in the form of time-based restricted stock that vests 50% on the second and fourth anniversary of the grant date, respectively.

The Compensation Committee believes the above structure will ensure the retention of our executive team through these uncertain times and will revisit the long-term incentive program structure in 2022.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROCESS: ROLES

Role of the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Consultant: The Compensation Committee oversees and provides strategic direction to management regarding all aspects of our pay program for senior executives. It sets the compensation of the CEO, the non-CEO NEOs as well as the Board members. If deemed appropriate, the Compensation Committee advises the Board of its determination of the compensation of the CEO and certain other executive officers, prior to its implementation. But, while the Compensation Committee may consider input provided by the Board, the compensation decisions and determinations are made solely by the Compensation Committee.

To assist in carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee is authorized to retain the services of independent advisors. For purposes of advice and consultation with respect to the compensation of our executive officers and the Board during fiscal 2020, the Committee reengaged Pearl Meyer a national compensation consulting firm. Prior to engaging Pearl Meyer, the Committee considered and assessed Pearl Meyer’s independence. To ensure Pearl Meyer’s continued independence and to avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest, the Compensation Committee does not permit Pearl Meyer to be engaged to perform any services for Cinemark beyond those services provided to the Compensation Committee which also has the sole authority to retain or terminate Pearl Meyer as its executive compensation consultant and to approve its fees and other terms of engagement. The Compensation Committee annually considers the independence of its compensation consultant and determines whether any related conflicts of interest require disclosure.

In establishing executive compensation, the Compensation Committee relies upon Pearl Meyer to:

assist in the selection of a group of peer companies;

provide information on compensation paid by such peer companies to their executive officers;

analyze compensation survey data to supplement publicly available information on compensation paid by peer companies;

advise on alternative structures or forms of compensation and allocation considerations; and

advise on appropriate levels of compensation for the NEOs and the other members of the executive team

During 2020, the Compensation Committee consulted with Pearl Meyer on all COVID-related compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee. Throughout the year, Pearl Meyer apprised the Compensation Committee of trends in executive compensation due to the impact of the pandemic and actions or discretions being considered or adopted by the Company’s peers and the broader market. The Compensation Committee consulted with Pearl Meyer to develop the most appropriate compensation framework that would align with the Company’s compensation philosophy in the context of the pandemic and the Company’s resilient performance under an exceptionally difficult business environment.

LOGO50


Role of Management and the CEO in Setting Executive Compensation: Each year, our CEO evaluates the performance of certain members of upper management including Messrs. Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes (direct reports). Our CEO makes a recommendation for the compensation of his direct reports based upon his evaluation and their ABO rating, their roles and responsibilities, and market benchmarking data for similarly placed executives, as provided by Pearl Meyer. The Compensation Committee considers our CEO’s recommendation relative to our strategic plan, operating goals, and compensation philosophy. In consultation with Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee also considers general market conditions and industry trends to set non-CEO NEO executive compensation.

Process for Setting CEO Compensation: The Compensation Committee evaluates our CEO’s performance throughout the year considering our strategic plan, targets, operating goals, and key performance indicators. The Compensation Committee also considers general market conditions, specific industry trends and peer review data for each element of compensation, as provided by Pearl Meyer. The Compensation Committee also reviews the CEO’s employment agreement and assesses his target compensation. The CEO does not participate in discussions or decisions regarding his own compensation.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROCESS: PEER GROUP REVIEW

To help establish competitive ranges of base salary, incentive compensation opportunities, and target compensation, the Compensation Committee relies on competitive market data from surveys and reports prepared by Pearl Meyer. We consider market survey data from a group of size-appropriate comparators operating in the entertainment and retail industries (peer group) that are also traded publicly and with which we compete for executive talent.

Based on the criteria described above, the Compensation Committee used the peer group set forth below for purposes of setting executive compensation in February 2020 was as follows:

  AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.

Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.

Discovery, Inc.

  AMC Networks Inc.

Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.

IMAX Corporation

  Brinker International, Inc.

The Madison Square Garden Company

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

  Cineplex, Inc.

Cineworld

  Dave & Buster’s Entertainment, Inc.

E.W. Scripps Company

A blended market data using the most recent proxy data and size-appropriate survey information provided by Pearl Meyer was used by the Compensation Committee to determine 2019 compensation for each of the NEOs. The market data provides percentile compensation levels for various executive positions with comparable job responsibilities as our NEOs. The Compensation Committee also analyzes market data regarding compensation mix among base salary and annual and long-term incentives awards. The Committee does not endeavor to set executive compensation at or near any percentile, and it considers target compensation to be competitive if it is generally within a reasonable range of the market median. The Compensation Committee also considers other factors including level of responsibility, the individual’s performance, expectations regarding the individual’s future potential contributions, ability to drive the Company’s strategy, retention strategies, budget considerations, and the Company’s performance.

COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT

The Compensation Committee monitors our compensation policies and practices to determine whether our risk management objectives are being met and to adjust those policies and practices to address any incentives that have the potential to encourage risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us and any changes in our risk profile. As part of these considerations and consistent with our compensation philosophy, our compensation

LOGO51


program, particularly our annual and long-term incentive compensation plans, are designed to provide incentives for the executives to achieve performance objectives without encouraging excessive risk-taking. These considerations were particularly demonstrated during 2020 when the Compensation Committee made discretion-based equity grants to address and manage the risks of employee attrition and above-bar performance.

Below are the highlights of the Company’s compensation program which mitigate risks associated with compensation:

Appropriate mix of “short- vs. long-term” pay and “fixed vs. variable” pay” to reward overall performance;

Company performance measured against objective financial metrics;

Portion of individual cash bonus payout tied to the individual’s ABO ratings which measures the performance of the individual’s goals set against the Company’s strategic objectives for the year;

Employees’ commitment to our culture of accountability reinforced through a comprehensive performance management and compensation system;

Capped payout levels for incentive compensation;

Stock ownership requirements for directors, NEOs and executive vice-presidents – directors required to retain Common Stock ownership five times the value of their base retainer, the CEO five times his/her base salary and other executive officers two times their respective base salaries;

Vest of a significant portion of long-term equity incentive awards linked to performance over a period of time (with overlapping performance periods);

Validation of pay-for-performance on an annual basis by stockholders; and

Prohibiting, per our Supplemental Insider Trading Policy, covered employees from engaging in certain forms of hedging transactions, with respect to Company securities, which would block the employee from being exposed to the full risks of stock ownership as the Company’s other stockholders. Additionally, the covered employees may not hold Company securities in a margin account, and may not, without prior approval, pledge Company securities as collateral for any other loan except in the case of a non-margin loan where the covered employee demonstrates that the employee has the financial ability to repay the loan without resorting to the pledged securities. The Company has not, as of date, granted any exceptions to this policy. The Supplemental Insider Trading Policy covers all our directors and executive officers and any additional persons that the Company may from time to time designate as being subject to this policy because of their position with the Company and access to material nonpublic information.

Our Compensation Committee monitors and considers the risk mitigating factors when setting executive compensation. Based on such review, the Compensation Committee has concluded that our compensation programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a materially adverse effect on the Company or put the Company at-risk.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A as required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s 2020 Form 10-K, and the Board has approved the recommendation.

Respectfully submitted,

Nina Vaca (Chair)

Benjamin Chereskin

Carlos Sepulveda

LOGO52


SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

Plan Category  

Number of

Securities to be

Issued upon

Exercise of

Outstanding

Options,

Warrants and
Rights (1)

  

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price of

Outstanding

Options,

Warrants and

Rights

  

Number of Securities

Remaining Available for

Future Issuance Under

Equity Compensation

Plans (Excluding
Securities

Reflected in the First

Column)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  890,680  N/A  5,821,224
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  N/A  N/A  N/A

Total

  890,680     5,821,224

(1)

Represents unearned shares underlying restricted stock units, assuming the achievement of maximum performance goals.

LOGO53


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 2020

The following table sets forth summary information concerning the total compensation earned by our NEOs for each of the last three completed fiscal years.

        

Name and

Principal Position

  Year  

Salary

($)(1)

  

Stock

Awards

($)(2)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)(3)

  

All Other

Compensation

($)(4)

  Total ($)  

Lee Roy Mitchell

Chairman of the Board

  

2020

  589,394  764,998  0  

25,688

  1,380,080 
  

2019

  

1,000,001

    1,414,002  

24,089

  2,438,092 
  

2018

  

975,000

    1,036,426  

23,900

  2,035,326  

Mark Zoradi

Chief Executive Officer

  

2020

  740,632  5,761,220  0  413,437  6,915,289 
  

2019

  1,100,000  3,099,012  1,944,250  165,517  6,308,779 
  

2018

  

1,000,000

  3,049,518  1,063,000  132,738  5,245,256  

Sean Gamble

Chief Operating Officer & Chief Financial Officer

  

2020

  

521,435

  1,821,528  

0

  116,007  2,458,970 
  

2019

  

625,000

  1,119,263  

837,562

  

107,773

  2,689,598 
  

2018

  

600,000

  

1,186,109

  

617,072

  

61,796

  2,464,977  

Michael Cavalier

Executive Vice President –

General Counsel & Secretary

  

2020

  

440,923

  

1,323,650

  

0

  107,592  1,872,165 
  

2019

  

540,000

  

833,712

  

723,654

  108,139  2,205,505 
  

2018

  

525,000

  

918,064

  

539,938

  

123,311

  2,106,313  

Valmir Fernandes

President – Cinemark
International

  

2020

  

441,633

  

1,184,878

  

0

  114,810  1,741,321 
  

2019

  

540,000

  

698,698

  

615,762

  109,796  1,964,256 
  2018  525,000  795,705  357,000  128,448  1,806,153  
(1)

The reported amounts are the actual amounts earned during 2020 and reflects reduction in base salary from April through August as described above. See Executive Compensation Components-Base Salary for discussions on how base salary is determined, the base salaries set by the Compensation Committee in February 2020 and how base salary was impacted by the pandemic. See 2020 Target Total Direct Compensation Mix for the percentage of 2020 total target compensation set in February to be paid as base salary.

(2)

The reported numbers reflect the aggregate grant date fair market values of the annual restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards granted in February, the Retention Equity Grant awarded in August and the Bonus Equity Grant awarded in December. See Executive Compensation Components-Long-term Incentive Compensation for discussions on how long-term incentive compensation is set and the annual grant awarded in February. See 2020 Target Total Direct Compensation Mix for the percentage of 2020 total target compensation set in February as target long-term incentive compensation. See also Executive Compensation Components-Base Salary and Executive Compensation Components-Cash Bonus for discussions on the Retention Equity Grant and the Bonus Equity Grant.

The grant date fair values were calculated based on the closing price of Common Stock on December 14, 2020 of $15.70, August 18, 2020 of $11.04, February 18, 2020 of $31.71, February 19, 2019 of $36.77 and February 19, 2018 of $39.03, per share. The fair market values of the performance-based restricted stock units are based on target achievement as the most probable outcome, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures. See Note 17 to the Company’s 2020 Form 10-K for a discussion of the assumptions used in determining the grant date fair values of these long-term equity incentive awards, including forfeiture assumptions and the period over which the Company will recognize compensation expense for such awards.

Mr. Mitchell does not receive any annual grants due to his substantial equity ownership in the Company. and he did not receive any Retention Equity Grant. The reported number for Mr. Mitchell reflects the value of his Bonus Equity Grant.

As required by the rules of the SEC, the table below provides the grant date fair values of the restricted stock units at the maximum level of payment. As certified by the Compensation Committee in February 2020, 105% of the target opportunity of the restricted stock units awarded in 2018 will vest in February 2022. Additionally, as discussed on page 49 under Impact of COVID-19 on Long-term Incentive Compensation, the restricted stock units granted in 2019 and 2020 will vest at target in February 2023 and February 2024, respectively.

LOGO54


Name 2020                2019                2018 

Lee Roy Mitchell

  N/A       N/A       N/A   

Mark Zoradi

  $                5,774,993       $            4,019,365       $            2,812,424     

Sean Gamble

  $                1,270,429       $            1,131,781       $               944,955     

Mike Cavalier

  $                   874,118       $               838,172       $               708,746     

Valmir Fernandes

  $                   728,379       $               698,483       $               590,602     

The terms of the restricted stock and restricted stock units granted in 2020 are discussed under Executive Compensation Components-Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation and the footnote disclosures to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020 table.

(3)

The reported amounts are the cash bonuses earned for the respective fiscal years. The cash bonuses earned for a fiscal year are paid in the first quarter of the following year subject to the attainment of performance targets set by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the covered fiscal year. There were no cash bonus payouts for 2020. The cash bonuses for 2019 were paid on March 5, 2020 and for 2018 on February 28, 2019 respectively. See Executive Compensation ComponentsCashBonus for a discussion of how cash bonus is set. See also 2020 Target Total Direct Compensation Mix for the percentage of the target compensation paid as bonus.

(4)

The compensation reported in this column include the following:

Name                  

Fiscal

Year

  

Annual
Matching
Contributions
to 401(K)
Savings Plan

($)

  

Life, Group and

Disability

Insurance

Premiums Paid

by Company

($)

  

Dividends Paid on
Restricted Stock
and Vested RSU(i)

($)

  

Other

($)

Lee Roy

Mitchell

    2020          17,100            8,588                     —          —
    2019          16,800            7,289                     —          —
    2018          16,500            7,400                     —          —

Mark

Zoradi

    2020          17,100          17,582            348,755  30,000(ii)
    2019          16,800          20,733              97,984  30,000(ii)
    2018          16,500          13,960              72,278  30,000(ii)

Sean

Gamble

    2020          17,100            5,675              93,231          —
    2019          16,800            5,684              85,289          —
    2018          16,500            5,296              40,000          —

Michael

Cavalier

    2020          17,100            7,611              82,881          —
    2019          16,800            7,616              83,723          —
    2018          16,500            7,798              99,013          —

Valmir

Fernandes

    2020          17,100          15,374              82,336          —
    2019          16,800            9,760              83,235          —
    2018          16,500            9,891            102,057          —
(i)

Dividends paid on all outstanding restricted stock, and dividends paid on restricted stock units at the time of vest of the underlying Common Stock. The restricted stock units granted in 2016 vested in February and the restricted stock units granted in 2017 were subject to accelerated vest in December. The accrued dividends outstanding on the underlying Common Stock were paid.

(ii)

Annual personal expense allowance pursuant to Mr. Zoradi’s employment agreement.

For a narrative description of the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2020, see Executive Compensation Components for a discussion of the various elements of compensation, including general description of the formula or criteria to be applied in determining the amounts payable, material terms of the long-term equity incentive awards, Grants of Plan-Based Awards 2020 table for details of the equity granted in 2020 and Discussion of the Terms of the Employment Agreements with Our NEOs for compensation pursuant to the terms of the respective employment agreements.

LOGO55


CEO PAY RATIO FOR 2020

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of SEC Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our median-compensated employee and the annual total compensation of our CEO.

For the year ended December 31, 2020:

the annual total compensation of our median-compensated employee, was $6,011; and

the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table presented elsewhere in this proxy statement, was $6,915,289

based on this information, the ratio of the total compensation of Mr. Zoradi, to the annual total compensation of our median-compensated employee was 1,150 to 1.

To identify our median employee, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee” for this purpose, the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates that we used were as follows:

We determined our median employee based on our employee population as of October 1, 2020 (the “Determination Date”) after excluding the employee populations of certain jurisdictions comprising approximately 5% of our total employees as permitted by the de minimis exception of the applicable rules.

To identify the median employee from our employee population, we used actual salary payments reflected in our payroll records, which we believe is a reasonable method of identifying the median employee. The substantial majority of our employees do not participate in annual bonus or long-term incentive programs, therefore we believe that excluding those programs from consideration does not meaningfully impact the identification of the median employee.

In making these determinations, we annualized the compensation for employees who were on our payroll as of the Determination Date but were salaried new hires and salaried employees who were on a leave of absence by taking an employee’s compensation for the number of bi-weekly pay periods for which they were employed or actively employed and annualizing such amount for the full year of 26 pay periods. Except for the annualization as described, we did not make any assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to total cash compensation.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the applicable rules. The rules allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, apply certain exclusions, and make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. Therefore, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above.

LOGO56


GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2020

The following table specifies the grants of awards made under our cash bonus and equity incentive plans to the NEOs during and for 2020.

       
Name 

Grant

Date(1)

  

Approval

Date(2)

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards

($)(3)

  

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive Plan

Awards(4)

  

All Other

Stock

Awards(5)

  

Grant

Date FV

of Stock

Awards(6)

 
          Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum         

Lee Roy

Mitchell

  -  2/12/20  510,001   1,020,001   1,530,002   -   -   -   -   - 
  12/15/20  12/3/20                          48,726  $764,998 

Mark

Zoradi

  -  2/12/20  687,500   1,375,000   2,062,500      $3,299,996 
  2/19/20  2/12/20     26,017   104,068   182,119   $3,299,996 
  2/19/20  2/12/20        34,689  $1,099,988 
  8/19/20  8/19/20        29,891  $329,997 
  12/15/20  12/3/20                          65,684  $1,031,239 

Sean

Gamble

  -  2/12/20  330,000   660,000   990,000      
  2/19/20  2/12/20     5,723   22,894   40,064   $725,960 
  2/19/20  2/12/20        14,569  $1,099,988 
  8/19/20  8/19/20        12,554  $329,997 
  12/15/20  12/3/20                          31,528  $1,031,239 

Michael

Cavalier

  -  2/12/20  249,756   499,511   749,267      
  2/19/20  2/12/20     3,938   15,752   27,566   $499,496 
  2/19/20  2/12/20        10,501  $277,494 
  8/19/20  8/19/20        10,557  $116,549 
  12/15/20  12/3/20                          23,861  $374,618 

Valmir

Fernandes

  -  2/12/20  249,756   499,511   749,267      
  2/19/20  2/12/20     3,281   13,126   22,970   $416,216 
  2/19/20  2/12/20        8,751  $332,987 
  8/19/20  8/19/20        10,557  $116,549 
  12/15/20  12/3/20                          23,861  $374,618 
(1)

The grant date of the long-term incentive awards. As discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement, there were no cash bonus payouts for the year.

(2)

The dates the Compensation Committee approved the grants of the long-term incentive awards.

(3)

The reported numbers were the estimated future payouts calculated when the Compensation Committee set the target cash bonus percentages in February. No cash bonus payouts were paid for 2020.

See Executive Compensation Components–Cash Bonus for a description of the cash bonus process, the target cash bonus opportunities of each NEO for 2020 and the impact of COVID-19 on the cash bonus payments for 2020 on page 44. See 2020 Target Total Compensation Mix for the percentage of 2020 total target compensation set in February as target cash bonus.

(4)

As part of the annual grant cycle, the Compensation Committee awarded Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes an aggregate maximum of 272,719 hypothetical shares of Common Stock as restricted stock units. The number of shares underlying each restricted stock unit award was determined by reference to the closing price of Common Stock on February 18, 2020 of $31.71 per share. In February 2021, as part of the discretion-based decisions related to the impact of COVID-19, the Compensation Committee eliminated the performance metric and certified the number of shares to be issued under the 2019 and 2020 restricted stock units at target. The restricted stock units will remain subject to the additional two-year service requirement and will vest in February 2024. See Executive Compensation Components–Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation for a discussion of the terms of the restricted stock units. See also Impact of COVID-19 on Long-term Incentive Compensation for a discussion of the discretion-based certification of the restricted stock units at target.

Holders of restricted stock units receive dividends that are attributable to the maximum levelunderlying Common Stock to the extent such dividend is declared by our Board and is paid at the same rate the dividend is paid to other stockholders. Prior to the suspension of payment. However,our dividend in 2020, the quarterly dividend rate was $0.36 per share of Common Stock.

LOGO57


(5)

On February 19, 2020, as certified bypart of the annual grant cycle, the Compensation Committee only 86%awarded Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and 96%Fernandes an aggregate of 68,510 shares of restricted stock. The number of shares underlying each award was determined by reference to the closing price of the target opportunityCommon Stock on February 18, 2020 of $31.71 per share.

On August 19, 2020, the Compensation Committee awarded shares of restricted stock under the Retention Equity Grant to all corporate employees and theatre general managers. The number of shares underlying each NEO award was determined by reference to the closing price of the Common Stock on August 18, 2020 of $11.04 per share.

On December 15, 2020, the Compensation Committee awarded restricted stock units awardedunder the Bonus Equity Grant to all employees covered under the cash bonus program. The number of shares underlying each NEO in 2016 and 2017 respectively, shall vest.award was determined by reference to the closing price of the Common Stock on December 14, 2020 of $15.70 per share.

Name

 

    

2018

 

     

2017

 

     

2016

 

 

Lee Roy Mitchell

     N/A      N/A      N/A  

Mark Zoradi

    $                        2,812,424     $                        2,378,800     $                        1,823,961  

Sean Gamble

    $944,955     $584,261     $451,880  

Mike Cavalier

    $708,746     $500,750     $433,354  

Valmir Fernandes

    $590,602     $471,133     $462,890  

TheSee Executive Compensation ComponentsLong-term Equity Incentive Compensation for a discussion of the terms of the restricted stock andgrants. Holders of restricted stock units are discussed under Analysisreceive non-forfeitable dividends to the extent declared by our Board, at the same rate paid to other stockholders of the DesignCompany. Prior to the suspension of theExecutive Compensation Program – Long-term Equity Incentive Compensation andour dividend beginning May 2020, the footnote disclosures to the Grantsdividend rate was $0.36 per share of Plan-Based Awards in 2018 table. See also Compensation Mix for the percentage of target total compensation for 2018 granted as long-term equity incentive awards.

(3)

The reported amounts are the cash bonuses earned for the respective fiscal years. The cash bonuses earned for a fiscal year are paid in the first quarter of the following year subject to the attainment of performance targets set by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the covered fiscal year. The cash bonuses were paid on February 28, 2019, February 27, 2018 and February 24, 2017 respectively. See Analysis of the Design of the Executive Compensation Program Cash Bonus for a discussion of how cash bonus is set. See alsoCompensation Mixfor the percentage of the target total compensation paid as cash bonus.Common Stock paid quarterly.

(4)

The compensation reported in this column include the following:

Name 

Fiscal    

Year    

 

Annual

Matching
Contributions

to 401(K)

Savings Plan

($)

  

  Life, Group and  
Disability
Insurance
Premiums Paid
by Company

($)

   

  Dividends Paid on  
Restricted Stock

and Vested RSU(i)

($)

     

Other    

($)    

 
Lee Roy Mitchell 2018      16,500   7,400    -      - 
 2017      14,175   7,411    -      - 
 2016      13,912   7,210    -      - 

Mark

Zoradi

 2018      16,500   13,960    72,278      30,000(ii)  
 2017      14,175   13,959    46,711      30,000(ii)  
 2016      13,912   13,337    31,442      30,000(ii)  

Sean

Gamble

 2018      16,500   5,296    40,000      - 
 2017      14,175   5,294    27,810      - 
 2016      13,912   5,005    21,302      - 

Michael

Cavalier

 2018      16,500   7,798    99,013        
 2017      14,175   7,796    74,997      - 
 2016      13,912   7,507    78,125      - 

Valmir

Fernandes

 2018      16,500   9,891    102,057      - 
 2017      14,175   9,898    79,786      - 
 2016      13,912   9,672    83,993      - 

(i)

Dividends paid on all outstanding restricted stock and dividends paid on restricted stock units at the time of issuance of the underlying Common Stock. The restricted stock units granted on March 26, 2014 vested on March 26, 2018 and the accrued dividends outstanding on the underlying Common Stock were paid.

(ii)

Annual personal expense allowance pursuant to Mr. Zoradi’s employment agreement.

For a narrative description of the amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018, see Design of the Executive Compensation Program andAnalysis of the Design of the Executive Compensation Program for a discussion of the various elements of compensation, including general description of the formula or criteria to be applied in determining the amounts payable, material terms of the long-term equity incentive awards,Grants of Plan-Based Awards 2018table for details of the equity granted in 2018 andDiscussion of the Terms of the Employment Agreements with Our NEOs for compensation pursuant to the terms of the respective employment agreements.

CEO Pay Ratio for 2018

Pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the SEC adopted a rule requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of the median employee’s annual total compensation to the total annual compensation of the principal executive officer (“PEO”). The 2018 total compensation for our median employee was $8,626 and for our PEO, Mr. Zoradi, it was $5,245,256. The resulting ratio of our CEO’s pay to the pay of our median employee for is 608 to 1.

There have been no changes in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements in 2018 that would significantly impact the process that we used to identify the median employee for the 2017 compensation. However, the median employee identified for 2017, a Theatre Usher in the U.S. (the “2017 median employee”), was not employed by the Company during 2018. Therefore, as permitted by the SEC rules, we replaced the 2017 median employee’s compensation with that of another employee (the “2018 median employee”) whose compensation was substantially similar to that of the 2017 median employee. The 2018 median employee is also a Theatre Usher in the U.S. and worked approximately 981 hours during 2018.

Our employees, whether employed on a full-time, part-time, seasonal or temporary basis were included to calculate the median employee. However, as permitted by thedeminimis exception of the applicable rules, we excluded the employee populations of certain foreign jurisdictions comprising less than 5% of our total employees. The cash compensation included base salary, cash bonus and benefits, the three most consistently

applied compensation measures at Cinemark. We do not widely distribute long-term incentive awards so it was not included in the calculation of total compensation. We annualized the compensation for salaried new hires and salaried employees who were on a leave of absence. Except for the annualization as described, we did not make any assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to total cash compensation.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the applicable rules. The rules allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, apply certain exclusions, and make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. Therefore, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2018

The following table specifies the grants of awards made under our cash bonus and equity incentive plans to the NEOs during and for 2018.

Name 

Grant

Date(1)

  

Approval

Date(2)

  

Estimated Future Payouts
UnderNon-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards(3)

  

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(4)

  

All Other

Stock

Awards(5)

  

Grant

Date FV

of Stock

Awards(6)

 
           Threshold   Target   Maximum   Threshold   Target   Maximum         

Lee Roy

Mitchell

  2/28/2019       $ 487,500  $  975,000  $1,462,500   -   -   -   -   - 

Mark

Zoradi

  2/28/2019   2/14/2019   $ 500,000  $  1,000,000  $1,500,000      
  2/19/2018   2/14/2018      24,019   48,039   72,058   $  1,874,949 
  2/19/2018                              

 

 

 

30,094

 

 

 

 

$

 

1,174,569

 

 

Sean

Gamble

  2/28/2019   2/14/2019   $ 270,000  $    540,000  $810,000      

 

 

 

  2/19/2018   2/14/2018      8,070   16,141   24,211   $629,970 
  2/19/2018                              

 

 

 

14,249

 

 

 

 

$

 

556,138

 

 

Michael

Cavalier

  2/28/2019   2/14/2019   $ 236,250  $  472,500  $708,750      
  2/19/2018   2/14/2018      6,053   12,106   18,159   $472,497 
  2/19/2018                              

 

 

 

11,416

 

 

 

 

$

 

445,566

 

 

Valmir

Fernandes

  2/28/2019   2/14/2019   $ 223,125  $   446,250  $669,375      

 

 

 

  2/19/2018   2/14/2018      5,044   10,088   15,132   $393,735 
  2/19/2018                              

 

 

 

10,299

 

 

 

 

$

 

401,970

 

 

(1)

The payment date of the cash bonus and grant date of the long-term equity incentive awards.

(2)

The dates the Compensation Committee approved the payouts of the cash bonus and the grants of the long-term equity incentive awards.

(3)

See Analysis of the Design of the Executive Compensation Program Cash Bonus for a description of the cash bonus process and the target bonus opportunities of each NEO for 2018. See Compensation Mix for the percentage of total compensation for 2018 paid as cash bonus. See Summary Compensation Table for 2018 and the related footnote disclosure for the actual cash bonus amounts paid to each NEO for 2018.

(4)

On February 19, 2018, the Compensation Committee awarded Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes an aggregate maximum of 129,560 hypothetical shares of Common Stock as restricted stock units. The number of shares underlying each restricted stock unit award was determined by reference to the closing price of Common Stock on February 16, 2018 of $39.03 per share. SeeAnalysis of the Design of the Executive Compensation Program – Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensationfor a discussion of the terms of the restricted stock units. Holders of restricted stock units receive dividends that are attributable to the underlying Common Stock to the extent such dividend is declared by our Board and the Common Stock is issued at the time of vest. The dividend is paid at the same rate the dividend is paid to other stockholders, which is currently $0.34 per share of Common Stock per fiscal quarter.

(5)

On February 19, 2018, the Compensation Committee awarded Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes an aggregate of 66,058 shares of restricted stock (including the special grant discussed on page 38). The number of shares underlying each award was determined by reference to the closing price of the Common Stock on February 16, 2018 of $39.03 per share. The reported shares include the special restricted stock grant.

SeeAnalysis of the Design of the Executive Compensation Program Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensationfor a discussion of the terms of the restricted stock.

Holders of restricted stock receivenon-forfeitable dividends to the extent declared by our Board, at the same rate paid to other stockholders of the Company. The current dividend rate is $0.34 per share of Common Stock per fiscal quarter.

(6) 

The aggregate grant date fair values of restricted stock and restricted stock units were determined using the closing price of Common Stock on February 16, 2018 of $39.03 per share. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, for purposes of the Grants

of Plan-Based Awards in 2018 table the aggregate grant date fair values of restricted stock units were determined based upon the target level of payment as the most probable outcome and were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures. See Note 15 to the Company’s 2018 Form10-K, for discussion of the assumptions used in determining the grant date fair values of these share awards, including forfeiture assumptions, and the period over which the Company will recognize compensation expense for such awards.

For a narrative description of the amounts reported in the Grants of Plan Based Awards in 2018, see Analysis of the Design of the Executive Compensation Program for a discussion of the various elements of compensation, including general description of the formula or criteria to be applied in determining the amounts payable and material terms of the long-term equity incentive awards andDiscussion of the Terms of the Employment Agreements with Our NEOs for compensation pursuant to the terms of the respective employment agreements.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCALYEAR-END 2018

The following table lists the restricted stock and restricted stock units outstanding for each NEO as of December 31, 2018. There were no stock options outstanding for any NEO as of December 31, 2018.

            Stock Awards
Name

Number of

Shares or Units

of Stock That

Have Not

Vested

#

Market Value of

Shares or Units

of Stock That

Have Not Vested

(8)

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of

Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights

That Have Not Vested
#

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or Payout 

Value of Unearned Shares, 

Units or Other Rights That 

Have Not Vested

(11)

Lee Roy Mitchell

N/AN/AN/AN/A

Mark Zoradi

16,013(1)$            573,265--
14,081(2)$            504,100--
12,476(3)$            446,641--
13,896(4)$            497,477--
35,617(6)$         1,275,089--
18,715(9)$                                   669,979
24,019(10)$                                   859,892

Sean Gamble

10,760(1)$            385,208--
3,489(2)$            124,906--
9,193(3)$            329,109--
5,131(4)$            183,690--
2,677(5)$              95,837--
8,824(6)$            315,899--
8,031(7)$            287,510--
4,597 (9)$                                   164,555
8,070(10)$                                   288,918

Michael Cavalier

8,070(1)$            288,906--
3,346(2)$            119,787--
7,879(3)$            282,068--
4,920(4)$            176,136--
3,272(5)$            117,138--
8,462(6)$            302,940--
9,816(7)$            351,413--
6,053(10)$                                   216,697

Valmir Fernandes

6,725(1)$            240,755--
3,574(2)$            127,949--
7,413(3)$            265,385--
5,256(4)$            188,165--
3,495(5)$            125,121--
9,039(6)$            323,596--
10,485(7)$            375,363--
3,707(9)$                                   132,693
5,044(10)$                                   180,575

(1)

The number of shares of restricted stock granted on February 19, 2018 which vest equally on February 19, 2020 and February 19, 2022.

(2)

The number of shares of restricted stock granted on February 19, 2018 pursuant to the special grant which vest 100% on February 19, 2020.

(3)

The number of shares of restricted stock granted on February 14, 2017 which vest equally on February 14, 2019 and February 14, 2021.

(4)

The number of shares of restricted stock granted on February 19, 2016 that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and vest on February 19, 2020.

(5)

The number of shares of restricted stock granted on March 18, 2015 that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and vest on March 18, 2019.

(6)

The number of shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units granted on February 19, 2016 that have been certified to vest at 86% of the target opportunity. Subject to continued employment, the reported shares will be issued on February 19, 2020.

(7)

The number of shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units granted on March 18, 2015 that have been certified to vest at the maximum opportunity. The reported shares were issued on March 18, 2019.

(8)

The fair market value of the restricted stock was calculated based on the closing price of Common Stock on December 31, 2018 of $35.80 per share.

(9)

The number of shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units granted on February 14, 2017. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, the reported numbers are based on the assumption of achievement of the threshold performance over thetwo-year performance period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018 and satisfaction of an additional two year service requirement. On February 14, 2019, the Compensation Committee certified the vest for the NEOs at 96% of the target opportunity. To the extent they vest subject to the service requirement, the vested Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units shall be issued on February 14, 2021.

(10)

The number of shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units granted on February 19, 2018. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, the reported numbers are based on the assumption of achievement of the threshold performance over thetwo-year performance period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019 and satisfaction of an additional two year service requirement. To the extent they vest subject to the service requirement, the vested common stock underlying the restricted stock units shall be issued on February 19, 2022.

(11)

The fair market value of the unearned restricted stock units was determined based on the achievement of threshold performance targets at the closing price of Common Stock on December  31, 2018 of $35.80 per share.

STOCK OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2018

The following table provides information on the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units during 2018 for eachwere determined using the closing price of Common Stock on February 18, 2020 of $31.71, August 18, 2020 of $11.04 and December 14, 2020 of $15.70 per share. Pursuant to the rules of the NEOs. ThereSEC, for purposes of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2020 table the aggregate grant date fair values of restricted stock units were no outstanding stock optionsdetermined based upon the target level of payment as the most probable outcome and were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures. See Note 17 to the Company’s 2020 Form 10-K, for anydiscussion of the NEOsassumptions used in determining the grant date fair values of these share awards, including forfeiture assumptions, and the period over which the Company will recognize compensation expense for such awards.

For a narrative description of the amounts reported in the Grants of Plan Based Awards in 2020, see Executive Compensation Components for a discussion of the various elements of compensation, including general description of the formula or criteria to be applied in determining the amounts payable and material terms of the long-term equity incentive awards.

LOGO58


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 2020

The following table lists the restricted stock and restricted stock units outstanding for each NEO as of December 31, 2020. There were no stock options outstanding for any NEO as of December 31, 2020.

        Stock Awards     
Name  

Number of

Shares or Units

of Stock That

Have Not

Vested

#

  

Market Value of

Shares or Units

of Stock That

Have Not Vested

(7)

   

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Number of

Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights

That Have Not Vested

#

  

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards: Market or Payout

Value of Unearned Shares,

Units or Other Rights That

Have Not Vested

(10)

 

Lee Roy Mitchel

   48,726(6)  $            848,320    -   - 

Mark Zoradi

   8,007(1)  $139,402    15,615(8)  $            271,857 
   

50,439

10,909

34,689

29,891

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(5) 

 $

$

$

$

878,143

189,926

603,935

520,402

 

 

 

 

   26,017(9)  $452,956 
   65,684(6)  $1,143,558          

Sean Gamble

   5,380(1)  $93,666    4,397(8)  $76,552 
   

16,947

6,426

14,569

12,554

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(5) 

 $

$

$

$

295,047

111,877

253,646

218,565

 

 

 

 

   5,723(9)  $99,645 
   31,528(6)  $548,902          
   4,035(1)  $70,249    3,256(8)  $56,687 

Michael Cavalier

   

12,711

4,824

10,501

10,557

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(5) 

 $

$

$

$

221,299

83,986

182,822

183,797

 

 

 

 

   3,938(9)  $68,561 
    23,861(6)  $415,420          

Valmir Fernandes

   3,363(1)  $58,550    2,714(8)  $47,251 
   

10,592

4,074

8,751

10,557

23,861

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(5) 

(6) 

 $

$

$

$

$

184,407

70,928

152,355

183,797

415,420

 

 

 

 

 

   3,281(9)  $57,130 
(1)

The number of shares of restricted stock granted on February 19, 2018 that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2020.

(2)

The number of shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units granted on February 19, 2018. On February 12, 2020, the Compensation Committee certified the performance at 105% of the target opportunity. To the extent the restricted stock units vest subject to the additional service requirement, the Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units shall be issued on February 14, 2022.

(3)

The number of shares of restricted stock granted on February 19, 2019 that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2020. See Impact of COVID-19 on Long-term Incentive Compensation for a discussion of the accelerated vest.

(4)

The number of shares of restricted stock granted on February 19, 2020 as part of the annual grant cycle. These shares vest 50% on the second and fourth anniversary of the grant date.

(5)

The number of shares of restricted stock awarded under the Retention Equity Grant on August 19, 2020. These shares vest 100% on the second anniversary of the grant date.

(6)

The number of shares of restricted stock awarded under the Bonus Equity Grant. These shares vest on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(7)

The fair market value was calculated based on the closing price of Common Stock on December 31, 2020 of $17.41 per share.

(8)

The number of shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units granted on February 19, 2019. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, the reported numbers are based on the assumption of achievement of the threshold performance

LOGO59


over the two-year performance period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020 and satisfaction of an additional two-year service requirement. However, In February 2021, as part of the discretion based decisions related to the impact of COVID-19, the Compensation Committee certified the performance of the 2019 restricted stock units at target. The restricted stock units will remain subject to the additional two-year service requirement and will vest in February 2023. See Impact of COVID-19 on Long-term Incentive Compensation for a discussion of the discretion-based certification of the restricted stock units at target.
(9)

The number of shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units granted on February 19, 2020. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, the reported numbers are based on the assumption of achievement of the threshold performance over the two-year performance period from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 and satisfaction of an additional two-year service requirement. However, In February 2021, as part of the discretion based decisions related to the impact of COVID-19, the Compensation Committee certified the performance of the 2020 restricted stock units at target. The restricted stock units will remain subject to the additional two-year service requirement and will vest in February 2024. See Impact of COVID-19 on Long-term Incentive Compensation for a discussion of the discretion-based certification of the restricted stock units at target.

(10)

The fair market value was calculated based on the closing price of Common Stock on December 31, 2020 of $17.41 per share.

STOCK OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2020

The following table provides information on the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units during 2020 for each of the NEOs. There were no outstanding stock options for any of the NEOs as of December 31, 2020.

Stock Vested

 

Name

 

 

Stock Awards

 

     Stock Awards 
 

 

Number of Shares Acquired

on Vesting(1)

#

 

 

 

Value Realized on Vesting(2)

($)

     

Number of Shares Acquired

on Vesting(1)

#

     

Value Realized on Vesting(2)

($)

 

Lee Roy Mitchell

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

     -      - 

Mark Zoradi

 

 

 

 

 

13,896

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

542,361

 

 

 

 

     124,679     $                3,127,973 

Sean Gamble

 

 

 

 

 

5,130

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

                                   200,224

 

 

 

 

     42,670     $1,044,633 

Michael Cavalier

 

 

 

 

 

24,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

928,142

 

 

 

 

     37,094     $693,793 

Valmir Fernandes

 

 

 

 

 

25,839

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

991,411

 

 

 

 

     36,126     $716,371 

 

(1) 

The reported numbers include Common Stock from the following vest events:

 i.

FiftyRemaining 50% percent of the restricted stock granted in 2016 which vested on February 19, 2018;2020;

 ii.

Remaining 50% percent of the restricted stock granted in 2017 which vested on December 15, 2020 under the COVID-19 related accelerated vests;

iii.

Fifty percent of the restricted stock granted to Messrs. Fernandes and Cavalier in 2014 that2018 which vested on March 26, 2018; andFebruary 19, 2020;

 iii.iv.

Fifty percent of the restricted stock granted in 2019 which vested on December 15, 2020 under the COVID-19 related accelerated vests;

v.

Shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units granted to Messrs. Fernandes and Cavalier in 2014 that2016 which vested on March 26, 2018.February 19, 2020; and

vi.

Shares of Common Stock underlying the restricted stock units granted in 2017 which vested on December 15, 2020

 

(2) 

The aggregate dollar amount realized upon vesting was calculated based upon the closing price of Common Stock on the following dates:

 i.

February 16, 201819, 2020 of $39.03; and$31.64

 ii.

March 23, 2018December 15, 2020 of $38.20$16.25

LOGO60


DISCUSSION OF THE TERMS OF THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS WITH OUR NEOsNEOS

We have employment agreements with our NEOs. Consistent with our compensation philosophy, the Company entered into the employment agreements to more closely align the compensation of certain executive officers more closely with market competitive compensation.

Below is a summary of the key provisions of the current employment agreements of our NEOs.

Term

On February 20, 2018, the Company elected to extend the term of Mr. Zoradi’s employment agreement to December 31, 2019.

The initial terms of the employment agreements of Messrs. Mitchell, Gamble, Fernandes, and Cavalier is three years. Mr. Mitchell’sAt the end of each year, the term is extended for an additionalone-year period atunless the end of the term while the term for each of Messrs. Gamble, Fernandes and CavalierNEO’s employment is extended for an additional one year period at the end of each year of the Term.terminated.

Base salary

The base salaries are subject to review each year by our Compensation Committee for increase (but not decrease).

Cash Bonus

In addition to base salaries, the NEOs are eligible to receive a cash bonus upon the Company meeting certain performance targets set by the Compensation Committee for the year. Mr. Zoradi’s target cash bonus shall not be less than 100% of his base salary and the maximum target shall not be less than 150% of his base salary.

Long-term Equity Incentive Awards

Except for Mr. Mitchell, theThe NEOs are entitled to participate in and receive grants of long-term equity incentive awards. Mr. Zoradi’s long-term equity incentive awards must be at least 200% of his base salary.

Benefits

The NEOs qualify for our 401(k) matching program and are also entitled to certain additional benefits including life insurance and disability insurance. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Mitchell is entitled to life insurance benefits of not less than $5 million and disability benefits of not less than 66% of his base salary.

Perquisites

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Mitchell is entitled to a luxury automobile and a membership at a country club. Currently, Mr. Mitchell does not have a luxury automobile, or a country club membership paid for by the Company.

Unless Mr. Mitchell’s employment is terminated by us for cause or under a voluntary termination, Mr. Mitchell will also be entitled to, for a period of five years, tax preparation assistance upon termination of his employment.

Mr. Zoradi is entitled to receive an annual allowance of $30,000 for personal travel and living expenses, reduced by standard withholding and other authorized deductions.

The employment agreements of Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Fernandes and Cavalier provide that unless the executive’s employment is terminated by us for cause the executive will be entitled to office space and support services for a period of not more than three (3) months following the date of any termination.

Covenants

All of the employment agreements contain various covenants, including covenants related to confidentiality andnon-competition (other than certain permitted activities as defined therein). In addition, Mr. Mitchell’s employment agreement has a covenant ofnon-solicitation (as defined in the employment agreement). Allnon-compete covenants have a term of one year after termination of the executive’s employment. However, for Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes, if employment is terminated for

LOGO61


Good Reason (as defined in the employment agreements) and for Mr. Mitchell, if employment is terminated due to the Sale of the Company (as defined in the employment agreement), the covenant ofnon-competition becomes null and void. Thenon-solicitation covenant in Mr. Mitchell’s employment agreement has a term of three years after termination of Mr. Mitchell’s employment.

Severance Payments

The employment agreements provide for severance payments upon termination of employment, the amount and nature of which depends upon the reason for termination.

Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason or Without Cause

If Mr. Mitchell is terminated by us without cause, Mr. Mitchell shall receive accrued compensation (which includes unpaid base salary, a pro rata cash bonus for the year in which the termination occurs and any previously vested long-term equity incentive awards and benefits such as retirement benefits and vacation pay, in accordance with the terms of the plan or agreement pursuant to which such long-term equity incentive awards or benefits were granted) through the date of termination (the “Accrued(Accrued Employment Entitlements”)Entitlements); an amount equal to Mr. Mitchell’s base salary in effect as of the date of such termination, payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices for a period of twelve (12) months; an amount equal to the most recent cash bonus Mr. Mitchell received for the year prior to the date of such termination, payable within thirty (30) days of termination and Mr. Mitchell and his dependents will be entitled to continue to participate in the Company’s welfare benefit plans and insurance programs for twelve (12) months from the termination date. Any outstanding stock options granted to Mr. Mitchell shall be vested and/or exercisable for the period through the date of such termination of employment, and shall remain exercisable, in accordance with the terms contained in the plan and the agreement pursuant to which such option awards were granted.

If Mr. Mitchell resigns for good reason (as defined in his employment agreement), he shall receive all of the above stated payments and benefits except that the base salary shall be payable in a lump sum subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

If Mr. Zoradi is terminated by us without cause, resigns for good reason (as defined in the agreement), is terminated by us without cause or whenupon expiration of the term or renewal term of the employment agreement, expires, he shall receive, the Accrued Employment Entitlements; an amount equal to his base salary in effect as of the date of such termination payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices through the end of the term, subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code; he and his dependents will be entitled to continue to participate in the Company’s welfare benefit plans and insurance programs for a period of twenty-four (24) months from the termination date; any outstanding long-term equity incentive awards with time-based vesting provisions shall become immediately vested as of the termination date and any long-term equity incentive awards with performance-based vesting provisions shall remain outstanding through the remainder of the applicable performance period, and if or to the extent the performance provisions are attained, shall become vested without regard to any continued employment requirement.

If Messrs. Gamble, Fernandes or Cavalier is terminated by us without cause, the executive shall receive the Accrued Employment Entitlements; two times the base salary in effect as of the date of such termination, payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices for a period of twenty-four (24) months; an amount equal to the most recent cash bonus received by the executive for the year ended prior to the date of such termination, payable in a lump sum within thirty (30) days of termination; outstanding stock options will become fully vested and exercisable upon such termination; long-term equity incentive awards other than stock options with time-based vesting provisions shall become vested on a pro rata basis and long-term equity incentive awards other than stock options with performance-based vesting provisions shall remain outstanding through the remainder of the applicable performance period and if or to the extent the performance provisions are attained shall become vested on a pro rata basis without any regard to any continued employment requirement. The executive and executive’s dependents will also be entitled to continue to participate in the Company’s welfare benefit plans and insurance programs for a period of twenty-four (24) months from the termination date.

If Messrs. Gamble, Fernandes or Cavalier resigns for good reason (as defined in their respective employment agreement) the executive shall receive all of the above stated payments and benefits except that the base salary shall be payable in a lump sum subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

LOGO62


Termination Due to Death or Disability

In the event an executive’s employment is terminated due to his death or disability (as defined in the employment agreement), the executive or his estate will receive: the Accrued Employment Entitlements; a lump sum payment equal to twelve (12) months of executive’s base salary as in effect at the time of termination, provided, in the case of disability, such amount shall be offset by the amount of base salary paid by the Company to executive or his representative following the date he was first unable to substantially perform his duties under his employment agreement through the date of termination, any benefits payable to executive and/or his beneficiaries in accordance with the terms of any applicable benefit plan and the executive (in disability) and executive’s dependents will be entitled to continue to participate in the Company’s welfare benefit plans and insurance programs for twelve (12) months from the termination date. All outstanding long-term equity incentive awards shall vest in accordance with the terms of the incentive plan.

Termination for Cause or Voluntary Termination

In the event an executive’s employment is terminated by us for cause or under a voluntary termination (other than termination due to disability or good reason), the executive will receive accrued base salary through the date of termination and any previously vested rights under a stock option or similar award issued under an incentive compensation plan in accordance with the terms of such plan.

Termination Due to Change-in-ControlChange in control

Mr. Mitchell does not have a change-in-controlchange in control provision in his employment agreement.

In the event an executive’s employment is terminated by us (other than for disability, death or cause) or by executive for good reason within one (1) year after a change-in-controlchange in control (as defined in the employment agreement), the executive shall receive accrued compensation through the date of termination; sum of two times executive’s base salary and one and one half times the most recent cash bonus received by executive for any year ended prior to the date of termination payable in a lump sum within 30 days of termination and executive and executive’s dependents shall be entitled to continue to participate in the Company’s welfare benefit plans and insurance programs for a period of 30 months from the termination date. Any outstanding equity award granted to the executive shall become fully vested and/or exercisable as of the date of such termination and shall remain exercisable in accordance with the terms of the plan or agreement pursuant to which such long-term equity incentive awards were granted.

Information on amounts payable had a termination for without cause or good reason, achange-in-control, change in control, death or disability occurred on December 31, 20182020 may be found under the headings – Potential Payments UponTermination by us Without Cause or by Executive for Good Reason, Potential Payments Upon Termination due to Change-in-ControlChange in Control and Potential Payments Upon Death or Disability.

The following tables provide the amounts payable to the NEOs pursuant to their respective employment agreements upon severance without cause, for a good reason, for cause, death or disability and change-in-control,change in control, assuming such triggering event occurred on December 31, 2018.2020.

LOGO63


Potential Payments upon Termination by us Without Cause or by Executive for Good Reason

 

        
Name Salary (1)  Bonus (2)  

Health

Insurance(3)

  

Life and

Disability

Insurance(3)

  Assistance(4)  

Value of

Equity

Awards(5)

  Total 

Lee Roy Mitchell

  

 

$     975,000

 

 

 

  

 

$  2,462,890

 

 

 

  

 

$          6,637

 

 

 

  

 

$        7,400

 

 

 

  

 

$        86,500

 

 

 

  

 

$                 -

 

 

 

  

 

$  3,538,427

 

 

 

Mark Zoradi

  

 

$  1,000,000

 

 

 

  

 

$  1,063,000

 

 

 

  

 

$        20,993

 

 

 

  

 

$      27,921

 

 

 

  

 

$             828

 

 

 

  

 

$  7,162,578

 

 

 

  

 

$  9,275,320

 

 

 

Sean Gamble

  

 

$  1,200,000

 

 

 

  

 

$  1,281,092

 

 

 

  

 

$        26,214

 

 

 

  

 

$      10,591

 

 

 

  

 

$             828

 

 

 

  

 

$  2,032,011

 

 

 

  

 

$  4,550,736

 

 

 

Michael Cavalier

  

 

$  1,050,000

 

 

 

  

 

$  1,172,338

 

 

 

  

 

$        26,214

 

 

 

  

 

$      15,596

 

 

 

  

 

$             828

 

 

 

  

 

$  1,852,169

 

 

 

  

 

$  4,117,145

 

 

 

Valmir Fernandes

  $  1,050,000   $     895,455   $        18,269   $      19,782   $             828   $  1,800,506   $  3,784,840 

    Name Salary (1)  Bonus (2)  

Health

Insurance(3)

  

Life and

Disability

Insurance(3)

  Assistance(4)  

Value of

Equity

Awards(5)

  Total 

Lee Roy

Mitchell

 $  1,020,001  $  1,414,002  $      6,124  $      8,588  $      86,500   -  $      2,535,215 

Mark Zoradi

 $1,100,000  $-  $19,076  $35,163  $828  $      8,549,163  $9,704,230 

Sean Gamble

 $1,320,000  $837,562  $27,340  $11,351  $828  $1,054,073  $3,251,154 

Michael

Cavalier

 $1,110,025  $723,654  $27,340  $15,221  $828  $777,677  $2,654,745 

Valmir

Fernandes

 $  1,110,025  $  615,762  $      25,154  $      30,748  $      828  $      669,989  $      2,452,505 
(1) 

Based on the base salaries in effect as of December 31, 2018,2020, the amounts reported are calculated as follows:one-time the base salary for Messrs. Mitchell and Zoradi and two times the base salary for Messrs. Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes. Subject to Treasury Regulations as specified in the respective employment agreements, for termination without cause, the amounts would have been payable according to the Company’s normal payroll practices for a period of 24 months to Messrs. Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes; for a period of 12 months to Mr. Mitchell and through the end of the Term (as defined in the employment agreement) to Mr. Zoradi. For termination by executive for good reason, the above stated payments for Messrs. Mitchell, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes would have been payable in a lump sum subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

(2) 

For Mr. Zoradi, the amount is the cash bonus he would have received for 20182020 payable according to normal payroll practices. Since the Company did not pay any cash bonus for 2020, Mr. Zoradi’s payment for bonus would have been zero. For Messrs. Mitchell, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes, the amounts reported are calculated as follows: the sum of the cash bonus the NEO would have received for 20182020 and the cash bonus received by the NEO for 2017. The2019. Since the Company did not pay any cash bonus for 2020, the reported amounts are the cash bonuses paid for 2018 would have been payable to the NEOs at the same time as payments are made to other similarly situated executives.2019. The cash bonuses for 2017reported amounts would have been payable to Messrs. Mitchell, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes in a lump sum within 30 days of termination.

(3) 

The amounts reported are calculated as follows: welfare benefit plans and insurance programs for a period of 12 months for Mr. Mitchell and 24 months for Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes. Disability insurance includes premiums for long-term disability, individual disability income protection and short-term disability.

(4) 

Mr. Mitchell is entitled to receive tax preparation assistance for five years following the date of termination. We estimate the cost of such preparation to be approximately $17,300 per year. Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes are entitled to use our office space for a period of three months following the date of termination. The amount reported is based on the use of a 144 square foot office at a rental rate of approximately $23 per square foot per annum.year.

(5) 

The amounts reported have been determined based on the following provisions in the respective employment agreements.

Pursuant to Mr. Zoradi’s employment agreements, any outstanding equity award with time-based vesting provisions would have vested as of the termination date. Any long-term equity incentive awards with performance-based vesting provisions would have remained outstanding through the remainder of the applicable performance period and if or to the extent the performance provisions are attained shall vest without regard to any continued employment requirement.

Pursuant to the employment agreements of Messrs. Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes, any outstanding long-term equity incentive awards with time-based vesting provisions would have vested on a pro rata basis. Any long-term equity incentive awards with performance-based vesting provisions would have remained outstanding through the remainder of the applicable performance period and if or to the extent the performance provisions are attained shall vest without regard to any continued employment requirement on a pro rata basis. There is no provision in Mr. Mitchell’s agreement for vest of any long-term equity incentive awards.

The pro rata basis for the long-term equity incentive awards is based on the percentage determined by dividing (i) the number of days from and including the grant date of such long-term equity incentive award through the termination date of the NEO’s employment, by (ii) the number of days from the grant date to the full vesting date/end of the applicable performance period, as applicable, of such long-term equity incentive awards.

LOGO64


Pursuant to the above, the total number of shares of Common Stock subject to the long-term equity incentive awards that would have vested for each of Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes on December 31, 20182020 are as follows:

Restricted Stock:Stock

 

        

Name

  

Number of Shares        

 

Lee Roy Mitchell

   

N/A

-
 

Mark Zoradi

   

56,466

149,180
 

Sean Gamble

   

19,846

15,367
 

Michael Cavalier

   

17,469

11,610
 

Valmir Fernandes

   

16,632

10,935
 

Restricted stock units: As disclosed previously, the restricted stock units granted in 2015, 2016 and 2017 shall vest at the maximum, at 86% of target and at 96% of target, respectively. We assumed for purposes of this disclosure that the restricted stock granted in 2018 shall vest at the maximum.Stock Units

 

        Name

  

Number of Shares        

 

Lee Roy Mitchell

   

N/A

-
 

Mark Zoradi

   

143,606

341,869
 

Sean Gamble

   

36,914

45,177
 

Michael Cavalier

   

34,267

33,058
 

Valmir Fernandes

   

33,662

27,548
 

The values of the equity awards have been calculated using the closing price of Common Stock on December 31, 20182020 of $35.80$17.41 per share.

Potential Payments upon Termination for Cause

If a NEO terminates his employment voluntarily, or is terminated for cause, we are only required to pay any accrued unpaid base salary through the date of such termination.

Potential Payments upon Termination due to Change-in-ControlChange in Control

 

Name Salary(1)  Bonus(2)  Health
Insurance(3)
  

Life and
Disability
Insurance(3)

 

  Assistance(4)  

Value of

Equity
Awards(5)

 

  Total 

Lee Roy Mitchell

 

  N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 

Mark Zoradi

 

 $

 

  2,000,000

 

 

 

 $

 

  3,043,750

 

 

 

 $

 

  26,241

 

 

 

 $

 

  34,901

 

 

 

 $

 

  828

 

 

 

 $

 

  7,162,578

 

 

 

 $

 

  12,268,298

 

 

 

Sean Gamble

 

 $

 

1,200,000

 

 

 

 $

 

1,613,102

 

 

 

 $

 

32,768

 

 

 

 $

 

13,239

 

 

 

 $

 

828

 

 

 

 $

 

2,904,848

 

 

 

 $

 

5,764,785

 

 

 

Michael Cavalier

 

 $

 

1,050,000

 

 

 

 $

 

1,488,538

 

 

 

 $

 

32,768

 

 

 

 $

 

19,495

 

 

 

 $

 

828

 

 

 

 $

 

2,559,235

 

 

 

 $

 

5,150,864

 

 

 

Valmir Fernandes

 

 $1,050,000  $1,164,683  $22,836  $24,727  $828  $2,442,813  $4,705,887 
    Name Salary(1)  Bonus(2)  

Health

Insurance(3)

  

Life and

Disability

Insurance(3)

  Assistance(4)  

Value of

Equity

Awards(5)

  Total 

Lee Roy

Mitchell

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -

Mark Zoradi

 $  2,200,000  $  2,916,375  $      23,845  $      43,954  $      828  $      8,549,163  $      13,734,165 

Sean

Gamble

 $1,320,000  $1,256,343  $34,175  $14,189  $828  $2,755,098  $5,380,632 

Michael

Cavalier

 $1,110,025  $1,085,481  $34,175  $19,027  $828  $2,034,359  $4,283,894 

Valmir

Fernandes

 $1,110,025  $923,643  $31,443  $38,435  $828  $1,796,085  $3,900,458 
(1) 

There is no change-in-controlchange in control provision in Mr. Mitchell’s employment agreement. The amounts reported are calculated as follows: two times the base salary in effect as of December 31, 20182020 payable in a lump sum within 30 days of such termination.

(2) 

The amounts reported are calculated as follows: the sum of the cash bonus the NEO would have received for 20182020 and one and a half times the cash bonus received by the NEO for 2017,2019, payable in a lump sum within 30 days of such termination. The Company did not pay any cash bonus for 2020 so the NEOs would have received only 1.5x the 2019 cash bonus.

(3) 

The amounts reported are calculated as follows: welfare benefit plans and insurance programs for a period of 30 months. Disability insurance includes premiums for long-term disability, individual disability income protection and short-term disability.

LOGO65


(4) 

Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes are entitled to use our office space for a period of three months following the date of termination. The reported amount is based on the use of a 144 square foot office at a rental rate of approximately $23 per square foot per annum.year.

(5) 

The amounts reported have been determined based on the following provision in the respective employment agreements: upon termination due to change-in-controlchange in control, any outstanding equity award granted to the NEO shall be fully vested and all restrictions shall lapse.

Pursuant to the above, the total number of shares of Common Stock subject to the long-term equity incentive awards that would have vested on for each NEO upon termination due to a change-in-controlchange in control on December 31, 20182020 are as follows:

Restricted Stock:

 

    Name

  

Number of Shares

 

Lee Roy Mitchell

   

N/A

-
 

Mark Zoradi

   

56,466

149,180
 

Sean Gamble

   

31,250

70,457
 

Michael Cavalier

   

27,487

53,778
 

Valmir Fernandes

   

26,463

50,606
 

Restricted stock units: As disclosed previously, the restricted stock units granted in 2015, 2016 and 2017 shall vest at the maximum, at 86% of target and at 96% of target, respectively. We assumed for purposes of this disclosure that the restricted stock granted in 2018 shall also vest at the maximum.

 

    Name

  

Number of Shares

 

Lee Roy Mitchell

   

N/A

-
 

Mark Zoradi

   

143,606

341,869
 

Sean Gamble

   

49,891

87,791
 

Michael Cavalier

   

44,000

63,072
 

Valmir Fernandes

   

41,772

52,558
 

The values of the long-term equity incentive awards have been calculated using the closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 20182020 of $35.80$17.41 per share.

Potential Payments upon Termination due to Death or Disability

 

Name Salary(1) Bonus(2) Health
Insurance(3)
 Life and
Disability
Insurance(3)
 Assistance(4) 

Value of

Equity
Awards(5)

 Total  Salary(1) Bonus(2) 

Health

Insurance(3)

 

Life and

Disability

Insurance(3)

 Assistance(4) 

Value of

Equity

Awards(5)

 Total 

Lee Roy Mitchell

 $975,000  $1,036,426  $6,637  $7,400  $    86,500   -  $    2,111,963    $  1,020,001  $            -  $6,124  $8,588  $      86,500  $39,403  $1,160,616 

Mark Zoradi

 $    1,000,000  $    1,063,000  $10,496  $    13,960  $828  $    4,489,011  $6,577,295    $1,100,000  $-  $9,538  $      17,582  $828  $      6,485,834  $      7,613,782 

Sean Gamble

 $600,000  $617,072  $    13,107  $5,296  $828  $2,032,011  $3,268,314    $660,000  $-  $13,670  $5,675  $828  $1,054,073  $1,734,246 

Michael Cavalier

 $525,000  $539,938  $13,107  $7,798  $828  $1,852,169  $2,938,840    $555,012  $-  $13,670  $7,611  $828  $777,677  $1,354,798 

Valmir Fernandes

 $525,000  $357,000  $9,135  $9,891  $828  $1,800,506  $2,702,360    $555,012  $-  $      12,577  $5,374  $828  $669,989  $1,253,780 
(1) 

The amounts reported are the base salary of each named executive officer in effect as of December 31, 2018,2020, payable in a lump sum.

(2) 

The amounts reported are the cash bonus each NEO would have received for 20182020 payable in a lump sum at the same time as the cash bonus payments are made to other similarly situated active executives. The Company did not pay any cash bonus for 2020, so the NEOs or their estates would not have received any amount as cash bonus upon disability or death.

(3) 

The amounts reported are calculated as follows: welfare benefit plans and insurance programs for a period of 12 months. Disability insurance includes premiums for long-term disability, individual disability income protection and short-term disability.

(4)

Mr. Mitchell is entitled to receive tax preparation assistance for five years following the date of termination. We estimate the cost of such preparation to be approximately $17,300 per year. Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes are entitled to use our office space for a period of three months following the date of termination. The reported amount is based on the use of a 144 square foot office at a rental rate of approximately $23 per square foot per annum.year.

LOGO66


(5) 

The amounts reported have been determined based on the following provision in the respective employment agreements: any outstanding long-term equity incentive awards shall vest on a pro rata basis. Any long-term equity incentive awards with performance-based vesting provisions shall remain outstanding through the remainder of the applicable performance period and if or to the extent the performance provisions are attained shall vest without regard to any continued employment requirement on a pro rata basis. The pro rata basis for the long-term equity incentive awards is based on the percentage determined by dividing (i) the number of days from and including the grant date of such equity award through the termination date of the NEO’s employment, by (ii) the number of days from the grant date to the full vesting date/end of the applicable performance period, as applicable, of such long-term equity incentive awards.

The participant or the participant’s estate or representative shall be entitled to receive any previously vested long-term equity incentive awards.

The participant or the participant’s estate or representative shall be entitled to receive any previously vested long-term equity incentive awards. Pursuant to the above, the total number of shares of Common Stock subject to the long-term equity incentive awards that would have vested upon death or disability of each NEO would have been as follows:

Restricted Stock:

 

    

Name

  

Number of Shares

 

Lee Roy Mitchell

   

N/A

2,263
 

Mark Zoradi

   

20,407

30,666
 

Sean Gamble

   

19,846

15,367
 

Michael Cavalier

   

17,469

11,610
 

Valmir Fernandes

   

16,632

10,935
 

Restricted stock units based on the assumption that the maximum IRR would be achieved over the relevant performance period:

 

    

Name

  

Number of Shares

 

Lee Roy Mitchell

   

N/A

-
 

Mark Zoradi

   

104,985

341,869
 

Sean Gamble

   

36,914

45,177
 

Michael Cavalier

   

34,267

33,058
 

Valmir Fernandes

   

33,662

27,548
 

The values of the long-term equity incentive awards have been calculated using the closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 20182020 of $35.80$17.41 per share.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as an independent,non-employee director and no member of the Compensation Committee has served as an officer or employee of the Company. During 2018,2019, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or the compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or on the Compensation Committee of our Board.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

To the Company’s knowledge, during 2020, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its insiders were complied with except for the late reporting on Form 4 for one transaction for each of Messrs. Zoradi, Gamble, Cavalier and Fernandes.

LOGO67


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations, promulgated under the Exchange Act. Unless indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. To the extent indicated below, shares beneficially owned by a person include shares of which the person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of the Record Date and are included for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Percentage ownership is based on 117,019,540119,539,989 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date. As of the Record Date, there were 4991,153 holders of record of our Common Stock.

 

    Beneficial Ownership   

Names of Beneficial Owner

 

  Number(1)   Percentage   

5% Stockholders

 

          

FMR LLC(2)

 

   

 

8,689,108

 

 

 

   

 

7.4%

 

 

 

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

 

   

 

12,314,087

 

 

 

   

 

10.5%

 

 

 

The Vanguard Group(4)

 

   

 

9,776,961

 

 

 

   

 

8.4%

 

 

 

Victory Capital Management Inc.(5)

 

   

 

6,299,802

 

 

 

   

 

5.4%

 

 

 

Directors and NEOs

 

          

Lee Roy Mitchell(6)

 

   

 

9,822,845

 

 

 

   

 

8.4%

 

 

 

Mark Zoradi(7)

 

   

 

172,730

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Sean Gamble(8)

 

   

 

70,839

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Michael Cavalier(9)

 

   

 

151,141

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Valmir Fernandes(10)

 

   

 

82,066

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Darcy Antonellis(11)

 

   

 

11,707

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Benjamin Chereskin(12)

 

   

 

72,457

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Nancy Loewe(13)

 

   

 

6,033

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Steven Rosenberg(13)

 

   

 

51,427

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Enrique Senior(13)

 

   

 

57,538

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Carlos Sepulveda(13)

 

   

 

38,433

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Raymond Syufy(13)

 

   

 

18,386

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Nina Vaca(13)

 

   

 

13,430

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Executive Officers & Directors as a Group (14 persons)(14)

 

   

 

10,569,032

 

 

 

   

 

9.0%

 

 

 

        Beneficial Ownership     
                                       Names of Beneficial Owner      Number(1)           Percentage     

5% Stockholders

          

FMR LLC(2)

   15,268,540    13

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

   12,284,669    10

Wellington Management Group LLP(4)

   11,475,166    10

The Vanguard Group(5)

   9,318,753    8
           

Directors and NEOs

          

Lee Roy Mitchell(6)

   10,176,031    9

Mark Zoradi(7)

   701,204    * 

Sean Gamble(8)

   214,110    * 

Michael Cavalier(9)

   256,536    * 

Valmir Fernandes(10)

   139,081    * 

Darcy Antonellis(11)

   22,223    * 

Benjamin Chereskin(12)

   82,973    * 

Nancy Loewe(13)

   16,549    * 

Steven Rosenberg(13)

   61,943    * 

Enrique Senior(13)

   68,054    * 

Carlos Sepulveda(13)

   48,949    * 

Raymond Syufy(13)

   28,902    * 

Nina Vaca(13)

   23,946    * 

Executive Officers & Directors as a Group (14 persons)(14)

   11,840,501    10
*

Less than 1%.

(1) 

In computing the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, the Company deemed outstanding shares of Common Stock subject to options held by that person that were currently exercisable at, or were exercisable within 60 days of, the Record Date. The Company did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

 

LOGO68


(2) 

Based upon statements in Schedule 13G/A filed by FMR LLC on February 13, 2019.January 8, 2021. FMR LLC may be deemed to beneficially own the reported shares of Common Stock and has filed Schedule 13G/A as the parent holding company or control person on behalf of its subsidiaries FIAM LLC, Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Trust& Research Company FIDELITY MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH COMPANY, FMR CO., INCLLC (beneficially owns 5%the reported shares) and Strategic Advisers LLC. The reporting entity has the sole power to vote or greaterdirect the vote of 816,013 shares and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 15,268,540 shares.

Members of the reported shares.Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, has (i) solerepresenting 49% of the voting power over 1,046,039of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and (ii)the execution of the shareholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole dispositive power over 8,689,108 shares.to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (Fidelity Funds) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR Co. LLC), a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. FMR Co. LLC carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. The address of FMR LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210.

Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders’ voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the execution of the shareholders’ voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (“Fidelity Funds”) advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company (“FMR Co”), a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR LLC, which power resides with the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. Fidelity Management & Research Company carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Fidelity Funds’ Boards of Trustees. The address of FMR LLC is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210.

(3) 

Based upon statements in Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. on January 24, 2019.February 4, 2021. Black Rock, Inc. may be deemed to beneficially own the reported shares of Common Stock and has filed Schedule 13G/A as the parent holding company or control person on behalf of its subsidiaries BlackRock Life Limited, BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Fund Advisors (beneficially owns 5% or greater of the reported shares), BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd., BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Deutschland AG, BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A., BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited and BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited and BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd. BlackRock, Inc. reported (i)The reporting entity has the sole voting power over 11,682,479to vote or direct the vote of 12,093,787 shares and (ii) sole dispositive power over 12,314,087to dispose or direct the disposition of 12,284,669 shares. The address of Black Rock Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(4)

Based upon statements in Schedule 13G filed by Wellington Management Group LLP on February 15, 2021. The following entities beneficially own the reported shares of Common Stock and has filed the Schedule 13G, holding companies - Wellington Investment Advisors LLP and Wellington Management Global Holdings, Ltd. and investment advisors Wellington Management Company LLP, Wellington Management Canada LLC, Wellington Management Singapore Pte Ltd, Wellington Management Hong Kong ltd, Wellington Management International Ltd, Wellington Management Japan Pte Ltd. Wellington Investment Advisors LLP controls direct Wellington Investment Advisors LLP ly, or indirectly through Wellington Management Global Holdings, Ltd., the Wellington investment advisors. Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP is owned by Wellington Group Holdings LLP which is owned by Wellington Management Group LLP. The reporting entity has shared voting power 10,385,553 shares, and shared dispositive of 11,475,166 shares. The address of Wellington Management Group LLP is c/o Wellington Management Company LLP, 280 Congress Street Boston, MA 02210.

(5) 

Based upon statements in Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group on February 11, 2019.8, 2021. The Vanguard Group may be deemed to beneficially own the reported shares of Common Stock and has filed Schedule 13G/A as the parent holding company or control person on behalf of its wholly-owned subsidiaries Vanguard Asset Management, Limited, Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, (beneficial owner of 40,674 shares) andVanguard Global Advisors, LLC, Vanguard Group (Ireland) Limited, Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd. (beneficial owner of 24,456 shares)., Vanguard Investments Canada Inc., Vanguard Investments Hong Kong Limited, Vanguard Investments UK, Limited. The Vanguard Group has (i) sole voting power over 52,405 shares (ii) shared voting power over 12,725108,778 shares (iii) shared dispositive power over 53,399192,689 shares, and (iv) sole dispositive power over 9,723,5629,126,064 shares. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355.

(5)

Based upon statements in Schedule 13G filed by Victory Capital Management Inc. on February 1, 2019. Victory Capital Management Inc. has (i) sole voting power over 6,005,046 shares and (ii) sole dispositive power over 6,299,802 shares. The address of Victory Capital Management Inc. is 4900 Tiedeman Road, 4th Floor, Brooklyn, OH 44144.

(6)

Includes 4,419,095 shares of Common Stock owned by The Mitchell Special Trust. Mr. Mitchell is theco-trustee of The Mitchell Special Trust. Mr. Mitchell expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares held by The Mitchell Special Trust.

(7) 

Includes 358,604 shares of restricted stock and 216,970 certified performance-based awards.shares.

(8) 

Includes 127,757 shares of restricted stock and 57,428 certified performance-based awards.shares.

(9) 

Includes 94,038 shares of restricted stock and 41,488 certified performance-based awards.shares.

(10) 

Includes 84,262 shares of restricted stock and 34,571 certified performance-based awards.shares.

(11) 

Includes 3,2117,501 shares of restricted stock.

(12)

Includes 3,2117,501 shares of restricted stock, 3,568 shares held by LEGATUM Partners, L.P., of which shares Mr. Chereskin is the beneficial owner and 9,736 shares held in a grantor trust of which Mr. Chereskin’s spouse is a trustee.

(13) 

Includes 3,2117,501 shares of restricted stock.

(14) 

The numbers reported do not include 512,356604,725 shares of Common Stock underlying performance awards granted to the NEOs.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company.

LOGO69


These insiders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file, including Forms 3, 4 and 5. Based solely on its review of the copies of such reports, the Company believes that each of its directors and executive officers has complied with the applicable reporting requirements for transactions in the Company’s securities during 2018.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Our Board has adopted a written policy supplementing our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics relating to the review, approval and ratification of transactions between us and “related parties” as generally defined by applicable rules under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The policy covers any related party transaction in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000. Our Board has determined that the Audit Committee is best suited to review and approve related party transactions, although in certain circumstances the Board may determine that a particular related party transaction be reviewed and approved by a majority of disinterested directors. In reviewing and approving a related party transaction, the Audit Committee, after satisfying itself that it has received all material information regarding the related party transaction under review, shall approve based upon the determination whether the transaction is fair and in the best interest of the Company.

Management presents any proposed related party transaction at an Audit Committee meeting for review and approval. If management becomes aware of a proposed or existing related party transaction that has not been presented orpre-approved by the Audit Committee, management shall promptly notify the Chair of the Audit Committee who shall submit such related party transaction to the full Audit Committee for approval or ratification. If management, in consultation with our CEO, CFO or General Counsel determines that it is not practicable to wait until the next Audit Committee meeting, the Chair of the Audit Committee has been delegated the authority to review, consider and approve any such transaction. In such event, the Chair of the Audit Committee shall report any related party transaction approved by him or her at the next Audit Committee meeting. The Audit Committee may establish guidelines it determines as necessary and appropriate for management to follow in dealings with related parties and related party transactions. The procedures followed in considering a related party transaction are evidenced in the resolutions and minutes of the meetings of the Audit Committee or Board, as applicable.

Certain Agreements

Laredo Theatre

We manage theatres for Laredo Theatre, Ltd., (“Laredo”). We are the sole general partner and own 75% of the limited partnership interests of Laredo. Lone Star Theatres, Inc. (“Lone Star”) owns the remaining 25% of the limited partnership interests in Laredo and is 100% owned by Mr. David Roberts, Lee Roy Mitchell’sson-in- law. Under the agreement, management fees are paid by Laredo to us at a rate of 5% of annual theatre revenues up to $50 million and 3% of annual theatre revenues in excess of $50 million. We recorded approximately $0.65 million of management fee revenue from Laredo during 2018. As the sole general partner and the majority limited partner of Laredo, we control the affairs of the limited partnership and have the rights to dissolve the partnership or sell the theatres. We also have a license agreement with Laredo permitting Laredo to use the “Cinemark” service mark, name and corresponding logos and insignias in Laredo, Texas.

Copper Beech Capital LLC

Effective September 2, 2009, Cinemark USA, Inc. (“CUSA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into an Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement (the “Aircraft Agreement”), with Copper Beech Capital, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (the “Operator”), for the use of an aircraft and flight crew on a time sharing basis. Lee Roy Mitchell, our Chairman of the Board, and his wife, Tandy Mitchell own the membership interests of the Operator. Prior to the execution of the Aircraft Agreement, the Company had an informal agreement with the Operator to use, on occasion, a private aircraft owned by the Operator. The private aircraft is used by Mr. Mitchell and other executives who accompany Mr. Mitchell to business meetings for the

Company. The Aircraft Agreement specifies the maximum amount that the Operator can charge the Company under the applicable regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration for the use of the aircraft and flight crew. The Company pays the Operator the direct costs and expenses related to fuel, pilots, landing fees, storage fees, insurance obtained for the specific flight, flight planning, weather contract services and expenses such asin-flight food and beverage services and passenger ground transportation incurred during a trip. For 2018, the aggregate amounts paid to the Operator for the use of the aircraft was approximately $0.068 million.

Pinstack

We hold events for our employees and their families at Pinstack, an entertainment facility, at various times throughout the year. Pinstack is majority-owned by Mr. Mitchell and his wife, Tandy Mitchell. During 2018, the Company paid Pinstack approximately $0.005 million for various employee events.

FE Concepts, LLC

During April 2018, the Company, through its wholly-owned indirect subsidiary CNMK Texas Properties, LLC, formed a joint venture, FE Concepts, LLC (“FE Concepts”), with AWSR Investments, LLC (“AWSR”), an entity owned by Lee Roy Mitchell and Tandy Mitchell. FE Concepts will develop and operate a family entertainment center that offers bowling, gaming, movies and other amenities. The Company and AWSR each invested approximately $20.0 million and each have a 50% voting interest in FE Concepts.

Family Relationships

Tandy Mitchell, wife of Mr. Mitchell, is an employee of the Company. Ms. Mitchell received total compensation of $193,972 for 2018. Such amount included base salary of $132,000, cash bonus of $38,379 and all other compensation of $23,593.

Walter Hebert III,brother-in-law of Mr. Mitchell, is the Executive Vice President – Purchasing of the Company. Mr. Hebert received total compensation of $558,709 for 2018. Such amount included base salary of $275,000, cash bonus of $127,930, grant date fair market value of restricted stock of $100,000 and all other compensation of $55,779.

Century Theatres

Our subsidiary, Century Theatres, currently leases 14 theatres and one parking facility from Syufy Enterprises or affiliates of Syufy Enterprises. Raymond Syufy, one of our directors, is an officer of the general partner of Syufy Enterprises. All of the leases except one have fixed minimum annual rent. The remaining lease has rent based upon a specified percentage of gross sales as defined in the lease with no minimum annual rent. For 2018, we paid approximately $23.5 million in rent for these leases.

Director Nomination Agreement

Under the Director Nomination Agreement which we entered into on April 9, 2007 with certain of our then current stockholders, the Mitchell Investors (as defined in the Director Nomination Agreement) have a right to designate two nominees to the Board and Messrs. Mitchell (Class III) and Sepulveda (Class II) are its current nominees.

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

 

 

How do I attend the Company’s Annual Meeting?

To be admitted to the virtual-only Annual Meeting, stockholders as of the Record Date must use the following link: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CNK2021 and enter the 16-digit control number found on the proxy card or the voting instruction form. By logging into the website, stockholders as of the Record Date will be able to vote shares electronically on all items to be considered at the Annual Meeting. Those without a 16-digit control number will be admitted to the virtual-only Annual Meeting as guests, but guests will not have the ability to vote or otherwise participate.

What different methods can I use to vote?

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote:

via the Internet – Visit www.proxyvote.com. Follow the instructions shown on your proxy card. Votes submitted via the internet must be received by 10:59 p.m. CDT, on May 19, 2021;

by telephone — Follow the instructions shown on your proxy card. Votes submitted by telephone must be received by 10:59 p.m. CDT, on May 19, 2021;

by mail — Complete, sign, date and return the proxy card in the postage paid envelope provided so that it is received before the Annual Meeting; or

by attending the virtual Annual Meeting — Follow the instructions on the Annual Meeting Website. You will need the control number printed on your proxy card. Submitting your proxy, whether via the Internet, by telephone, or by mail will not affect your right to vote at the virtual Annual Meeting should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting.

If you are a beneficial holder, you may vote:

by instructing your bank or broker — You should receive a voting instruction form from your bank or broker which you must return with your voting instructions to have your shares voted. If you have not received a voting instruction form from your bank or broker, you may contact it directly to provide instructions on how you wish to vote. Voting instructions submitted by beneficial owners to brokers or banks via the Internet or by telephone must be received by 10:59 p.m. CDT, on May 19, 2021; or

by attending the virtual Annual Meeting — If you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you will need to obtain a voting instruction form from your broker or bank that holds your shares of record. You will need the control number printed on your voting instruction form in order to vote at the Annual Meeting.

How can I submit questions for the Annual Meeting?

If you have questions pertaining to the business of the Annual Meeting, you must submit it in advance of the Annual Meeting. Questions may be submitted by visiting www.proxyvote.com beginning approximately two (2) weeks prior to the Annual Meeting and until 10:59 p.m. CDT, on Tuesday, May 18, 2021. You should have a proxy card or voting instruction form in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions. In order to allow us to answer questions from as many stockholders as possible during the Annual Meeting, each stockholder will be limited to one (1) question. Questions pertinent to the business of the Annual Meeting will be read aloud and answered during the Annual Meeting, subject to time constraints. Appropriate questions received that are not addressed at the Annual Meeting due to time constraints will be posted, along with our responses, in the Investor Relations section of our website as soon as practical after the conclusion of the Annual Meeting.

If there are matters of individual concern to a stockholder and not of general concern to all stockholders, or questions that are not directly related to the business of the Annual Meeting, you can contact us separately after the Annual Meeting through our Investor Relations website at https://ir.cinemark.com.

LOGO70


What can I do if I need technical assistance during the Annual Meeting?

If you encounter any difficulties accessing or participating in the virtual Annual Meeting, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting website log-in page.

Will the list of stockholders as of the Record Date be available during the Annual Meeting?

During the Annual Meeting, the list of our stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for viewing at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CNK2021. Stockholders requesting access to the list will be asked to provide the 16-digit control number found on their proxy card or voting instruction form previously mailed or made available to stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

What is the purpose of holding the Annual Meeting?Meeting?

We are holding the Annual Meeting to elect three Class IIIII directors, to ratify the selection of Deloitte and Touche as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20192021 and to hold anon-binding, advisory vote on our 2018

2020 executive compensation. Our Governance Committee has recommended the nominees to our Board and our Board has nominated the nominees. Our Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte and Touche as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20192021 and our Board has ratified the appointment. Our Compensation Committee has approved our executive compensation program and the Board has recommended that the stockholders vote to approve our executive compensation program and the compensation paid to our NEOs for 2018.2020. If any other matters requiring a stockholder vote properly come before the Annual Meeting, those stockholders present at the Annual Meeting and the proxies who have been appointed by our stockholders will vote as they deem appropriate.

How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

A majority of our outstanding Common Stock as of the Record Date must be present at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a “quorum.” Unless a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, no action may be taken at the Annual Meeting except the adjournment thereof until a later time. Shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you are present and vote in person at the Annual Meeting, if you vote via the Internet, by telephone, by mail or if you are represented by proxy. Abstentions and “brokernon-votes” are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders as of the Record Date can vote at the Annual Meeting.

What is the Record Date and what does it mean?mean?

The Record Date for the Annual Meeting is March 28, 2019.25, 2021. The Record Date is established by the Board as required by Delaware law. Owners of record of Common Stock at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to:

 (a)

receive notice of the Annual Meeting, and

 (b)

vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a stockholder who holds stock in street name?

(a) Stockholder of record: If your shares are registered in your name with our transfer agent, EQ, you are a stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As a stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your proxy directly to us or to a third party, or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

(b)Stockholder who holds stock in street name: If your shares are held by a broker or by a bank, you are considered to be a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or bank on how to vote and you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Your broker or bank, as the record holder of your shares, may exercise discretionary authority to vote on “routine” items but may not vote on“non-routine” items without your instructions.

Your broker or bank has enclosed or provided voting instructions for you to use in directing the broker or bank on how to vote your shares. Since a beneficial owner in street name is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy”voting instruction form from the broker or bank that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting.

How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

A majority of our outstanding Common Stock as of the Record Date must be present at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a “quorum.” Unless a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, no action may be taken at the Annual Meeting except the adjournment thereof until a later time. Shares are

LOGO71


counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you are present and vote at the Annual Meeting, if you vote via the Internet, by telephone, by mail or if you are represented by proxy. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

What is a proxy and how does the proxy process operate?operate?

A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. The person(s) that you designate to vote your shares are called proxies. Sean Gamble and Michael Cavalier of the Company have been designated as proxies for the Annual Meeting. The term “proxy” also refers to the written document or “proxy card” that you sign to authorize those persons to vote your shares.

By executing the proxy card, you authorize the above-named individuals to act as your proxies to vote your shares in the manner that you specify. The proxy voting mechanism is vitally important to us. In order for us to obtain the necessary stockholder approval of items, a quorum of stockholders must be present or represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy. Since few stockholders can spend the time or money to attend stockholder meetings in person, voting by proxy is necessary to obtain a quorum and complete the stockholder vote.Meeting. It is important that you attend the Annual Meeting in person or grant a proxy to vote your shares to assure a quorum is obtained so corporate business can be transacted. If a quorum is not obtained, we must postpone the Annual Meeting and solicit additional proxies, which is an expensive and time-consuming process.

What different methods can I use to vote?

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote:

via the Internet or by telephone — Follow the instructions shown on your proxy card. Votes submitted via the Internet or by telephone must be received by 10:59 p.m. CST, on May 22, 2019;

by mail — Complete, sign, date and return the proxy card in the postage paid envelope provided so that it is received before the Annual Meeting; or

in person — We will pass out written ballots at the Annual Meeting and you may deliver your completed and signed proxy card in person. Submitting your proxy or voting instructions, whether via the Internet, by telephone, or by mail will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting.

If you are a beneficial holder, you may vote:

by instructing your bank or broker — You should receive a voting instruction form from your bank or broker which you must return with your voting instructions to have your shares voted. If you have not received a voting instruction form from your bank or broker, you may contact it directly to provide instructions on how you wish to vote. Voting instructions submitted by beneficial owners to brokers or banks via the Internet or by telephone must be received by 10:59 p.m. CST, on May 22, 2019; or

in person — If you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you will need to obtain a “legal proxy” form from your broker or bank that holds your shares of record and you must bring that document to the Annual Meeting.

What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?instructions?

Stockholder of Record.

If you are a stockholder of record and you do not:

indicate when voting on the Internet or by telephone that you wish to vote as recommended by the Board; or

sign and return a proxy card without specific voting instructions.instructions

then the proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by the Board on all matters presented in this proxy statement and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owner.

If you own shares through a broker or bank and do not provide voting instructions to the broker or bank holding your shares, your broker or bank may represent your shares at the Annual Meeting for purposes of obtaining a quorum. Your broker or bank may vote your shares in its discretion on some “routine matters”. However, with respect to“non-routine matters”, your broker or bank may not vote your shares for you. With respect to these“non-routine matters”, the aggregate number of unvoted shares is reported as “brokernon-votes”.

Which ballot measures are called “routine” or“non-routine”?

Under the broker voting rules of the NYSE, the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte and Touche as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 20192021 (Item 2) is considered a “routine” matter, and the election of directors (Item 1) and thenon-binding, annual advisory vote on executive compensation (Item 3) are considered“non-routine” matters.

What are brokernon-votes?non-votes?

If you are the beneficial owner of shares and hold stock in street name, then the broker or bank, as the stockholder of record of the shares, may exercise discretionary authority to vote your shares with respect to “routine” matters but will not be permitted to vote the shares with respect to“non-routine” matters. A brokernon-vote occurs when you do not provide the broker with voting instructions on“non-routine” matters for shares owned by you but held in the name of the broker. For such matters, the broker cannot vote and reports the number of such shares as “brokernon-votes.”

LOGO72


How are brokernon-votes and abstentions treated?

Brokernon-votes and abstentions are counted for purposes of determining a quorum. However, see below with regards to the effect of brokernon-votes and abstentions on approval of specific agenda items.

What is the voting requirement for each of the items?items?

Approval of Item 1: Directors are elected by a plurality voting standard. The nominees who receive the highest number of affirmative votes cast by the stockholders present in personat the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereon will be elected. However, pursuant to the Corporate Governance Guidelines, in an uncontested election, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation from the Board and all committees of the Board following certification of the results of the Annual Meeting by the Inspector of Elections. The Governance Committee (excluding the nominee in question if applicable) would then consider the resignation offer and make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the resignation. Within 90 days following certification of the results of the annual meeting of stockholders, the Board will make a final determination as to whether to accept the director’s resignation. The Board’s explanation of its decision would then be promptly disclosed in a Form8-K filed with the SEC. If a director’s resignation is rejected by the Board, the director will continue to serve for the remainder of the term for which he or she was elected and until his or her successor is duly elected, except in the event of his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. The Board believes that this voting policy promotes stability in governance by ensuring that a full slate of carefully chosen and nominated members is elected at each annual meeting of stockholders.

Under the plurality voting standard, votes marked “For” will be counted in favor of the director nominee and brokernon-votes and votes withheld shall have no effect on the election of a director. However, a withheld vote could affect whether such director would be required to submit a resignation as discussed above.

Approval of Item 2: The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte and Touche requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by stockholders present in personat the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Since this proposalitem is considered a “routine” matter, brokernon-votes do not arise as brokers and banks may exercise discretionary authority to vote your shares. Abstentions will have no effect on this item.

Approval of Item 3: The advisory vote on executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by stockholders present in personat the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.

How does the Board recommend I vote?

The Board recommends that you vote:

FOR each of the nominees for director;

FORthe ratification of the appointment of Deloitte and Touche as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;2021; and

FOR thenon-binding, advisory vote to approve our executive compensation.

Can I revoke or change my proxy? proxy? If so, how?how?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the proxy has been exercised at the Annual Meeting.

If you are a stockholder of record, your proxy can be revoked in several ways:

by timely delivery of a written revocation to the Company Secretary;

by submitting another valid proxy bearing a later date; or

by attending the Annual Meeting in person and giving the inspector of election notice that you intend to votevoting your shares in person.shares.

LOGO73


If your shares are held in street name, you must contact your broker or bank in order to revoke your proxy. Generally, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker or bank, or, by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person if you have obtained a “legal proxy”voting instruction form from your broker or bank giving you the right to vote your shares.

Who counts the votes?votes?

The Company has retained a representative of Broadridge Financial Solutions to serve as an independent tabulator to receive and tabulate the proxies and as an independent inspector of election to certify the results.

Who pays for this proxy solicitation?solicitation?

The Company pays for this proxy solicitation. We use Broadridge Financial Solutions, its agents, and brokers to distribute all proxy materials to our stockholders. We will pay them a fee and reimburse any expenses they incur in making the distribution. Proxies will be solicited on behalf of the Board by mail, telephone, other electronic means or in person. We have retained D.F. King & Co., Inc., 48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10005, to assist with the solicitation for a fee of $7,500 plus reasonableout-of-pocket expenses.

How can I obtain copies of the Company’s annual reports and other available information about the Company?Company?

Stockholders may receive a copy of the Company’s 20182020 Form10-K at no charge by sending a written request to Michael Cavalier, Company Secretary at Cinemark Holdings, Inc., 3900 Dallas Parkway, Suite 500, Plano, Texas 75093.

You can also visit our Website athttp:https://investors.cinemark.comir.cinemark.com/ for free access to our corporate governance documents and our filings with the SEC, including our annual reports on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form10-Q, current reports on Form8-K, and all amendments to these reports. The SEC also maintains a Website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants. The address of the Website iswww.sec.gov.

DEADLINE FOR STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20202022 ANNUAL MEETING

For inclusion in the proxy statement: Stockholder proposals requested to be included in our proxy statement and form of proxy for our 20202022 annual meeting must be in writing and received by the end of business on December 10, 20193, 2021 at our principal executive offices at 3900 Dallas Parkway, Suite 500, Plano, Texas 75093, Attention: Michael Cavalier, Company Secretary.

Director nomination or proposal for annual meeting: Stockholders who wish to nominate a director or introduce a proposal not included in the proxy statement at the 20202022 annual meeting may do so in accordance with ourby-laws. These procedures provide that stockholders who wish to bring a proper subject of business before the 20202022 annual meeting must do so by a written notice in proper written form to the Company Secretary received not less than 90 and not more than120than 120 days before the anniversary date of the Annual Meeting and must be accompanied by certainthe information about the stockholder making the proposal, in accordance with ourby-laws.listed below. As a result, any notice given by or on behalf of a stockholder pursuant to these provisions of ourby-laws (and not pursuant to the SEC’s Rule14a-8(e)) must be received no earlier than January 24, 2020,20, 2022, and no later than February 23, 202019, 2022 at our principal executive offices at 3900 Dallas Parkway, Suite 500, Plano, Texas 75093, Attention: Michael Cavalier, Company Secretary.

To recommend a candidate for election to the Board for the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, a stockholder must submit the following information to the Company Secretary:

the name and address of the stockholder of record and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made;

a representation that the stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the annual meeting;

the number of shares of capital stock of the Company that are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made;

LOGO74


a description of any arrangements or understandings between the stockholder, the beneficial owner and the nominee or any other person (including their names);

the name, age, business and residential addresses of the stockholder’s nominee for director;

the biographical and other information about the nominee (including the number of shares of capital stock of the Company owned beneficially or of record by the nominee) that would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission; and

the nominee’s consent to be named as a nominee and to serve on the Board.

A copy of ourby-laws is available from the Company Secretary upon written request.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Stockholders Sharing a Common AddressSTOCKHOLDERS SHARING A COMMON ADDRESS

If you and other residents at your mailing address own Common Stock in street name, your broker or bank may have sent you a notice that your household will receive only one proxy statement for each company in which you hold stock through that broker or bank. Nevertheless, each stockholder will receive a separate proxy card. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce the Company’s printing and postage costs. If you did not respond that you did not want to participate in householding, the broker or bank will assume that you have consented, and will send one copy of our proxy statement to your address. You may revoke your consent to householding by contacting your broker or bank, if you hold Common Stock in street name, or the Company’s Secretary, if you are the registered holder of the Common Stock. The revocation of your consent to householding will be effective 30 days following its receipt. Upon written or oral request to the Company’s Secretary at the address or telephone number provided above, the Company will deliver promptly a separate copy of this proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of this proxy statement was delivered. By written or oral request to the same address (i) a stockholder may direct a notification to the Company that the stockholder wishes to receive a separate annual report or proxy statement in the future or (ii) stockholders who are sharing an address and who are receiving delivery of multiple copies of the Company’s annual reports or proxy statements can request delivery of only a single copy of these documents to their shared address.

Incorporation by ReferenceINCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The material under the headings “Compensation Committee Report,” “Audit Committee Report” and the disclosure regarding independence of the members of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the SEC nor deemed incorporated into any future filing with the SEC, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into the filing.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board knows of no other business that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other business is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, proxies received will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with the recommendation of the Board. Discretionary authority with respect to such other matters is granted by the execution of the enclosed proxy.

AVAILABILITY OF REPORT ON FORM10-K

Upon your written request, we will provide to you a complimentary copy of our 20182020 Form10-K (without exhibits) as filed with the SEC. Your request should be mailed to the Company’s offices, addressed as follows: Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Attention: Company Secretary, 3900 Dallas Parkway, Suite 500, Plano, Texas 75093. A free copy of the 20182020 Form10-K may also be obtained at the website maintained by the SEC atwww.sec.govor by visiting our website at http:https://investors.cinemark.comir.cinemark.com/ and clicking on the “Financials” tab and then on “SEC Filings.”

QUESTIONS

If you have questions or need more information about the Annual Meeting, write to:

Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

3900 Dallas Parkway Suite 500

Plano, Texas 75093

Attention: Michael Cavalier, Secretary

 

LOGO75


By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Michael Cavalier

Executive Vice President – General Counsel and Secretary

April 2, 2021

 

LOGO

LOGO

Michael Cavalier

Executive Vice President – General Counsel and Secretary76

April 8, 2019


LOGOLOGO

 

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC.

3900 Dallas Parkway, Suite 500DALLAS PARKWAY

Plano, TexasPLANO, TEXAS 75093

  

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on 05/22/2019.19/2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALSDuring The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CNK2021

If you would like to reduceYou may attend the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronicallymeeting via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and when prompted, indicatevote during the meeting. Have the information that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronicallyis printed in future years.the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on 05/22/2019.19/2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

   TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

        

 

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

 

For

All

 

Withhold

All

 

 

  

Withhold

For All

  Except

 

For All

 

 

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.

      
   

1.   Election of Class II Directors:

LOGO   

  

 

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

AllAllExcept     

1.Election of Class III Directors:  
 

LOGO

  

     

Nominees

01)Benjamin Chereskin         02) Lee Roy Mitchell         03) Raymond Syufy
       

01)   Darcy Antonellis                        02)     Carlos Sepulveda                         03)     Mark Zoradi

 
       
 

The  Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.

 For Against Abstain  
 

2.

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2019.2021.

     
 

3.

Non-binding, annual advisory vote on executive compensation.

 

 

  
 

NOTE:Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

     

For address change/comments, mark here.

(see reverse for instructions)

 

 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appearsappear(s) on this Proxy. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrator, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing thethis Proxy.

      
             
            
  

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

             

Signature (Joint Owners)

 

 Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)Date

    


CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Thursday, May 23, 201920, 2021

9:00 a.m. CDT

3800 Dallas Parkwaywww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CNK2021

Plano, Texas 75093

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Form 10-K and Notice &and Proxy Statement is/are available atwww.proxyvote.com

— — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ——— — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

 

LOGO

LOGO

  

 

CINEMARK HOLDINGS, INC.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Thursday, May 23, 201920, 2021

9:00 a.m. CDT

 

Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

3800 Dallas Parkway,

Plano, Texas 75093www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CNK2021

 

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on May 23, 201920, 2021.

 

The shares of stock you holdheld in yourthe account as of the Record Date will be voted as you specify on the reverse side.

 

If no choice is specified, the proxy will be voted “FOR” all Items.

 

By signing the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint Sean Gamble and Michael Cavalier, and each of them with full power of substitution, to vote yourthe shares on the matters shown on the reverse side and any other matters which may come before the Annual Meeting and all adjournments.

 

Address change/comments:

(If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

See reverse for voting instructions.